Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 17:17 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 17:17
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
shanks2020
User avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 14 Feb 2026
Posts: 236
Own Kudos:
40
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 236
Kudos: 40
Historical revisionism is different from history in that the former 03 May 2023, 21:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep
shanks2020
How would we know which noun phrase here "which" is modifying?
In case, which is modifying 2 or more than 2 entities joined by "OR", then which should be followed by a "plural" verb or "singular" verb?
For example below:
Tom or Peter, who are/is tall, will play basketball.
Mercedez Benz or Audi, which is/are luxury cars, is/are costly.
If we think about this type of construction logically, we can see that two singular nouns joined by "or" would not be plural because the construction names one OR the other.

So, the correct version is.

Tom or Peter, who IS tall, will play basketball.

Additionally, a relative clause placed after an "a or b" construction will always modify the noun or noun phrase that comes after "or."
Show more

MartyTargetTestPrep

Sorry to confirm it once again?
So in the above example, who will modify only Peter(tall) and not Tom ?
I was of the opinion that the modifier would modify both individually. Kindly correct if I am wrong.
User avatar
UkrHurricane
User avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Feb 2026
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
61
Given Kudos: 429
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: Simon '27
GMAT 1: 580 Q38 V32
GMAT 2: 590 Q49 V23
GMAT 3: 580 Q43 V27
GMAT 4: 630 Q45 V31 (Online)
GMAT 5: 670 Q47 V35 (Online)
GPA: 3.4
Schools: Simon '27
GMAT 5: 670 Q47 V35 (Online)
Posts: 54
Kudos: 61
Historical revisionism is different from history in that the former 09 Jul 2023, 08:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it is a low-quality question as it requires knowledge of specific terminology (historical negationism). Without that knowledge, one is torn between A and C.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
495 posts
bhanu29
358 posts