Hi SwethaReddyL,You landed on the right count (
2), but the route you took isn't valid, and it's worth seeing why so it doesn't backfire on a similar question.
Let me start where your setup goes off track. Look at the clean version gmatophobia and chetan2u posted. Taking
x(x+1)(x+2) as the common denominator:
- Left numerator: (x+
2) + (x+
1) =
2x+3- Right side, 1/(x+
1), written over the same denominator, has numerator
x(x+2)So the whole thing collapses to:
2x + 3 = x(x+2) -
2x+
3 = x2+
2x -
x2 = 3 - x = ±√
3.
In your work you wrote
2x+
3(x+
1) = x(x+
1)(x+
2) and kept the equation as a
cubic (a product of three consecutive terms). That happened because the common
(x+1) factor was never cancelled - it got dragged into both sides. Once you cancel it correctly, you're left with a simple quadratic, not a cubic.
The bigger issue is the divisibility step.This equation never says x is an integer. There's no rule forcing x(x+
1)(x+
2) to be "
3 consecutive numbers divisible by
6" - that's a number-property fact about
integers, and it simply doesn't apply to an equation you're solving for
any real x. The true solutions here,
±√3, aren't integers at all. Your x =
5 and x =
9 don't actually satisfy the original equation - check x=
5: the left side is tiny fractions that can't equal
1/6. Getting "
two" was a coincidence.
The takeaway: solve these by simplifying and taking roots, never by hunting for integers that make a product divisible by something. Equations give you roots through algebra - and those roots are allowed to be irrational.
Answer: CSwethaReddyL
Bunuel /
KarishmaB can you please tell me if the below approach is right?
I solved it this way,
i took the lcm after that,
x+2+x+1 (x+1) = x(x+1)(x+2)
2x+3(x+1) = x(x+1)(x+2)
5x+3 = 3 consecutive numbers
if i substitute values for x, the 3 consecutive numbers should be divisible by 3!, which is 6
by doing so, i get 2 values x = 5, 9
so i picked 2
but thinking of post 10, there are values divisible by 6 if substitute for x
help please