Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a romance published in 1499 that, though

Question

Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a romance published in 1499 that, though the author was originally anonymous, has been attributed to Francesco Colonna. Some academics, however, doubt that Colonna is the author because, as a Dominican monk, he would not have the skill or experience to produce such a work. One academic has recently made the assertion that the attribution is correct, citing as evidence Colonna’s proximity to the text’s publisher, Aldus Manutius, and the wealth of other complex Renaissance works of literature confirmed to be written and compiled by talented members of the clergy. In light of this argument, it is clear that it is indeed possible that a member of a monastic order may have produced such a text.

Which of the following, if true, would most support the academic’s recent hypothesis concerning the authorship of Hypnerotomachia Poliphili?

A The only indication that Colonna had anything to do with Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is his proximity to its publisher.

B Modern translators of the text have seen fit to attribute its composition to Colonna.

C Much of the writing in Renaissance Europe was published anonymously.

D An acrostic produced by reading the first letter of each chapter in Hypnerotomachia Poliphili forms Colonna’s name.

E Hypnerotomachia Poliphili contains few if any references to the monastic life that Colonna would have been familiar with.

ready4gmat

Pls help me with another question. I hardly believe D has any connections with the argument? More precisely, I barely understand the argument in this question.

arun6765 · Answer

Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a romance published in 1499 that, though the author was originally anonymous, has been attributed to Francesco Colonna. Some academics, however, doubt that Colonna is the author because, as a Dominican monk, he would not have the skill or experience to produce such a work. One academic has recently made the assertion that the attribution is correct, citing as evidence Colonna’s proximity to the text’s publisher, Aldus Manutius, and the wealth of other complex Renaissance works of literature confirmed to be written and compiled by talented members of the clergy. In light of this argument, it is clear that it is indeed possible that a member of a monastic order may have produced such a text.

Which of the following, if true, would most  support the academic’s recent hypothesis concerning the authorship of Hypnerotomachia Poliphili?  
 Academic hypothesis is that Colonna is the author of H.P.  . We need to strengthen the Academic's claim.

A The  only  indication that Colonna had anything to do with Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is his proximity to its publisher. 
No new information already stated and also that is not the only evidence.

B Modern translators of the text have seen fit to attribute its composition to Colonna. 
 We are not talking about modern translators in this argument .

C Much of the writing in Renaissance Europe was published anonymously. 
 Out of Scope.  
 
D An acrostic produced by reading the first letter of each chapter in Hypnerotomachia Poliphili forms Colonna’s name.  
Can be correctly used to strengthen the academic's claim.

E Hypnerotomachia Poliphili contains few if any references toagainstastic life that Colonna would have been familiar with. 
 Goes againtst the stated evidence in the argument.

ready4gmat

l01os · Answer

D is the correct answer. All other choices have nothing to do with the argument or weaken it.

kitkat4620 · Answer

D doesn’t establish Colonna as the author. It simply says the letters formed by reading the first letter form his name, does it mean Colonna wrote? Could be a fan of Colonna who wrote? 
B is a stronger answer imo

guddo · Answer

Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a romance published in 1499 that, though the author was originally anonymous, has been attributed to Francesco Colonna. Some academics, however, doubt that Colonna is the author because, as a Dominican monk, he would not have the skill or experience to produce such a work. One academic has recently made the assertion that the attribution is correct, citing as evidence Colonna’s proximity to the text’s publisher, Aldus Manutius, and the wealth of other complex Renaissance works of literature confirmed to be written and compiled by talented members of the clergy. In light of this argument, it is clear that it is indeed possible that a member of a monastic order may have produced such a text.
 
 Which of the following, if true, would most support the academic’s recent hypothesis concerning the authorship of Hypnerotomachia Poliphili?

The academic argues that Colonna could have written the text and that the attribution to him is correct.  The strongest support  would be evidence directly linking Colonna to the text itself, not merely evidence that monks were capable of writing complex works.

A. The only indication that Colonna had anything to do with Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is his proximity to its publisher.

This weakens the hypothesis. It says the evidence for Colonna is very limited.

B. Modern translators of the text have seen fit to attribute its composition to Colonna.

This helps somewhat, but it is weak. It shows that some modern scholars accept the attribution, but it does not give direct evidence that Colonna wrote the text.

C. Much of the writing in Renaissance Europe was published anonymously.

This explains why the text might have been anonymous, but it does not specifically connect Colonna to the work.

D. An acrostic produced by reading the first letter of each chapter in Hypnerotomachia Poliphili forms Colonna’s name.

This is correct. If the text itself contains a hidden pattern spelling Colonna’s name, that is  direct internal evidence  supporting the claim that Colonna was the author.

E. Hypnerotomachia Poliphili contains few if any references to the monastic life that Colonna would have been familiar with.

This weakens or at least does not help. If the text lacks material connected to Colonna’s life, it gives no support for his authorship.

Answer: (D)

Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a romance published in 1499 that, though

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Hypnerotomachia Poliphili is a romance published in 1499 that, though

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards