|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
12 Nov 2024, 02:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
Support Miranda: Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation.
Support Akeem: People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge.
Miranda: In the modern information age, centuries of accumulated knowledge are becoming accessible to more people than ever before. Yet, many countries are observing a troubling decline in the ability of individuals to distinguish between objective truths and deliberate falsehoods.
Akeem: Ancient libraries in Alexandria and Athens also housed vast collections of knowledge, yet those societies eventually entered what is now known as the Dark Ages. This demonstrates that simply increasing the availability of knowledge does not automatically improve people’s ability to critically evaluate misinformation.
Miranda: That may be true, but in those times, people had to physically visit a library to access its knowledge. Today, thanks to the Internet, verifiable information is far more accessible to a much larger population, regardless of where they are located.
Select for Support Miranda a statement that would support Miranda’s implied paradox, and select for Support Akeem a statement that would support Akeem’s rebuttal to Miranda. Make only two selections, one in each column.
Akeem: Ancient libraries in Alexandria and Athens also housed vast collections of knowledge, yet those societies eventually entered what is now known as the Dark Ages. This demonstrates that simply increasing the availability of knowledge does not automatically improve people’s ability to critically evaluate misinformation.
Miranda: That may be true, but in those times, people had to physically visit a library to access its knowledge. Today, thanks to the Internet, verifiable information is far more accessible to a much larger population, regardless of where they are located.
Select for Support Miranda a statement that would support Miranda’s implied paradox, and select for Support Akeem a statement that would support Akeem’s rebuttal to Miranda. Make only two selections, one in each column.
| Support Miranda | Support Akeem | |
| Many of the ancient libraries cited by Akeem as evidence were destroyed during the very Dark Ages he referenced. | ||
| Research conducted locally using physical texts can often provide a more rewarding and immersive experience for a scholar. | ||
| Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation. | ||
| People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge. | ||
| The format and medium of information often affect how it is presented and perceived. | ||
| In certain parts of modern Athens and Alexandria, accessing a physical library is still more reliable than accessing the Internet. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Support Miranda: Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation.
Support Akeem: People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge.
12 Nov 2024, 02:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Solution:
Miranda’s Paradox: Miranda argues that despite unprecedented access to information, people struggle to distinguish truth from falsehood. She implies that greater access to information, like through the Internet, should improve this ability.
Statement that supports Miranda's paradox: Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation.
• The study shows that more access to information should improve people’s ability to identify misinformation. However, as Miranda points out, this is not happening in practice. Thus, this statement contributes to the paradox, highlighting the gap between what should happen and what is actually observed in the modern information age.
Akeem’s Rebuttal: Akeem counters that simply having more knowledge available doesn’t ensure better critical thinking, as seen historically, where societies still believed in falsehoods despite access to vast knowledge.
Statement that supports Akeem's rebuttal: People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge." • This reinforces Akeem’s point that simply increasing the amount of knowledge does not address human tendencies, like emotional bias, which can override critical thinking and perpetuate belief in misinformation.
Analysis of Other Statements:
Many of the ancient libraries cited by Akeem as evidence were destroyed during the very Dark Ages he referenced.
• Not good because: It critiques the historical longevity of libraries but does not address the core debate about the impact of knowledge availability on misinformation. Research conducted locally using physical texts can often provide a more rewarding and immersive experience for a scholar.
• Not good because: This focuses on research satisfaction rather than the ability to identify misinformation, making it irrelevant to the discussion.
The format and medium of information often affect how it is presented and perceived.
• Not good because: While true, it does not directly support or challenge either argument about the impact of accessible knowledge on distinguishing truth from falsehood.
In certain parts of modern Athens and Alexandria, accessing a physical library is still more reliable than accessing the Internet.
• Not good because: It highlights infrastructure issues unrelated to whether access to information improves critical thinking or addresses misinformation.
Correct answer:
Support Miranda "Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation. "
Support Akeem "People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge."
Bunuel
Miranda’s Paradox: Miranda argues that despite unprecedented access to information, people struggle to distinguish truth from falsehood. She implies that greater access to information, like through the Internet, should improve this ability.
Statement that supports Miranda's paradox: Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation.
• The study shows that more access to information should improve people’s ability to identify misinformation. However, as Miranda points out, this is not happening in practice. Thus, this statement contributes to the paradox, highlighting the gap between what should happen and what is actually observed in the modern information age.
Akeem’s Rebuttal: Akeem counters that simply having more knowledge available doesn’t ensure better critical thinking, as seen historically, where societies still believed in falsehoods despite access to vast knowledge.
Statement that supports Akeem's rebuttal: People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge." • This reinforces Akeem’s point that simply increasing the amount of knowledge does not address human tendencies, like emotional bias, which can override critical thinking and perpetuate belief in misinformation.
Analysis of Other Statements:
Many of the ancient libraries cited by Akeem as evidence were destroyed during the very Dark Ages he referenced.
• Not good because: It critiques the historical longevity of libraries but does not address the core debate about the impact of knowledge availability on misinformation. Research conducted locally using physical texts can often provide a more rewarding and immersive experience for a scholar.
• Not good because: This focuses on research satisfaction rather than the ability to identify misinformation, making it irrelevant to the discussion.
The format and medium of information often affect how it is presented and perceived.
• Not good because: While true, it does not directly support or challenge either argument about the impact of accessible knowledge on distinguishing truth from falsehood.
In certain parts of modern Athens and Alexandria, accessing a physical library is still more reliable than accessing the Internet.
• Not good because: It highlights infrastructure issues unrelated to whether access to information improves critical thinking or addresses misinformation.
Correct answer:
Support Miranda "Independent studies involving thousands of individuals have demonstrated a clear link between greater access to information and an enhanced ability to recognize and reject misinformation. "
Support Akeem "People are often influenced more by emotional appeals or biases than by the sheer availability of factual knowledge."
28 Nov 2024, 13:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
I have revised the question, solution, and formatting by adding more details to enhance clarity.
