Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Final Lap
Joined: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 227
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.54
WE: Project Management (Retail Banking)

If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2013, 02:20
Question Stats:
49% (01:45) correct 51% (01:30) wrong based on 627 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal? (1) 24x is an integer. (2) 28x is an integer.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
KUDOS is the good manner to help the entire community.
"If you don't change your life, your life will change you"




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59039

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jun 2013, 02:32
If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?(1) 24x is an integer > \(24x=m\), where m an integer > \(x=\frac{m}{24}=\frac{m}{2^3*3}\), If m is a multiple of 3, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (2) 28x is an integer > \(28x=n\), where n an integer > \(x=\frac{n}{28}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\), If n is a multiple of 7, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) \(x=\frac{m}{2^3*3}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\) > \(\frac{m}{n}=\frac{2*3}{7}\) > m IS a multiple of 3 (as well as n IS multiple of 7). Sufficient. Answer: C. Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced. Questions testing this concept: doesthedecimalequivalentofpqwherepandqare89566.htmlanydecimalthathasonlyafinitenumberofnonzerodigits101964.htmlifabcdandeareintegersandp2a3bandq2c3d5eispqaterminatingdecimal125789.html700question94641.htmlisrs2isaterminatingdecimal91360.htmlplexplain89566.htmlwhichofthefollowingfractions88937.htmlHope it helps.
_________________




Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 442
Schools: Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jun 2013, 22:37
If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal? (1) 24x is an integer. (2) 28x is an integer. Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers Statement 1 If 24x is an integer than x can take the following values 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/12, 1/24 Some values of x can be reduced to a terminating decimal (1/2, 1/4, 1/8), while few can not be (1/3,1/6,1/12, 1/24) Insufficient Statement 2 If 28x is an integer than x can take the following values 1/2, 1/4, 1/7, 1/14, 1/28 Some values of x can be reduced to a terminating decimal (1/2, 1/4), while few can not be (1/7, 1/14, 1/28) Insufficient Statement 1& 2 If both 24x & 28x are integers than x can take the following values 1/2, 1/4 Both of these values of x can be reduced to a terminating decimal Sufficient Ans C. Hope the explanation will help many.
_________________
If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS. Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth Game Theory
If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply




Senior Manager
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 447
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36 GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41 GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2013, 11:18
Can someone explain me what is the meaning of terminating decimal.
_________________
Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/howtoscore750and750imovedfrom710to189016.html



Director
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 688
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GPA: 3.6

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2013, 11:25
trafficspinners wrote: Can someone explain me what is the meaning of terminating decimal. A decimal number that has digits that do not go on forever. Examples: 0.25 (it has two decimal digits) 0.123456789 (it has nine decimal digits) In contrast a Recurring Decimal has digits that go on forever Example of a Recurring Decimal: 1/3 = 0.333... (the 3 repeats forever)
_________________
When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....
GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...
GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabularylistforgmatreadingcomprehension155228.html learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmatanalyticalwritingassessment : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss



Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 57

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2013, 04:16
Rock750 wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?
(1) 24x is an integer.
(2) 28x is an integer. I have a bit of difficulty in understanding the intended meaning of "is it possible" part of the question. The answer can be yes and ofcourse no, but just that there is a possibility that the answer could be yes confuses me a bit. Had the question been framed like this " is x a terminating decimal?", then it would have been clearer. The use of the term "possible" makes it just a bit ambiguous. Put up for guidance please.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59039

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2013, 05:57
agourav wrote: Rock750 wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?
(1) 24x is an integer.
(2) 28x is an integer. I have a bit of difficulty in understanding the intended meaning of "is it possible" part of the question. The answer can be yes and ofcourse no, but just that there is a possibility that the answer could be yes confuses me a bit. Had the question been framed like this " is x a terminating decimal?", then it would have been clearer. The use of the term "possible" makes it just a bit ambiguous. Put up for guidance please. The question basically asks: if x is written as a decimal will it be a terminating decimal? Hope it's clear.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2012
Posts: 11

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Sep 2013, 11:58
since the question asks "is it possible", wouldn't the answer be D since .5 is a terminating decimal and 24*.5=12, and 28*.5=24?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59039

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Sep 2013, 05:30
thebloke wrote: since the question asks "is it possible", wouldn't the answer be D since .5 is a terminating decimal and 24*.5=12, and 28*.5=24? You misinterpret the question. The question asks: if x is written as a decimal will it be a terminating decimal? Thus the correct answer is C, not D.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2013
Posts: 158
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GMAT 1: 590 Q40 V30 GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Project Management (Entertainment and Sports)

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jan 2014, 09:48
we know that x is a proper positive fraction. we need to check whether x has powers of 5 or 2 in the denominator or not. 1. 24(x)=INT > \(x=Int/24\) if our integer is 3 then x is can be written as a terminating decimal otherwise x will be a nonterminating decimal 2. 28(x)=INT > same story here if our int is 7 then x can be written as a terminating decimal, otherwise x will be a nonterminating decimal 1+2 \(Int/3(2^3)=Int/7(2^2)\) > 7(4)Int=8(3)Int the expression has to be equal on both sides thus on the right hand side we need a 7 and on the right hand side we need a 3 and a two. We now know that our integer a terminating decimal because we can get rid of both 7 and 3 in the denominator. C. Hope it helps.
_________________
learn the rules of the game, then play better than anyone else.



Director
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 500
Concentration: International Business, Technology

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Mar 2015, 03:34
fameatop wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal? (1) 24x is an integer. (2) 28x is an integer.
Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers
Statement 1 If 24x is an integer than x can take the following values 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/6, 1/8, 1/12, 1/24 Some values of x can be reduced to a terminating decimal (1/2, 1/4, 1/8), while few can not be (1/3,1/6,1/12, 1/24) Insufficient
Statement 2 If 28x is an integer than x can take the following values 1/2, 1/4, 1/7, 1/14, 1/28 Some values of x can be reduced to a terminating decimal (1/2, 1/4), while few can not be (1/7, 1/14, 1/28) Insufficient
Statement 1& 2 If both 24x & 28x are integers than x can take the following values 1/2, 1/4 Both of these values of x can be reduced to a terminating decimal Sufficient
Ans C.
Hope the explanation will help many. indeed i am benefited by this solution . Kudos to you !!



Intern
Joined: 06 Apr 2015
Posts: 7

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 May 2015, 15:46
thebloke wrote: since the question asks "is it possible", wouldn't the answer be D since .5 is a terminating decimal and 24*.5=12, and 28*.5=24? i agree with this. The way it is phrased, it should be D. I understand how the answer C is achieved, but I don't think this question is worded well.... The fact that a terminating decimal is possible should be enough. The only way, in my mind that C is correct is if the question asks "is X a terminating decimal?".



Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 797
Location: United States
GPA: 3.98

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 May 2016, 13:35
Rock750 wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?
(1) 24x is an integer.
(2) 28x is an integer. Given information : 0 < x < 1 (x is a fraction between 0 and 1)Question asked: x as a terminating decimal? x can only be written as terminating decimal when the denominator can be written in the form of 2^n or 5^n (1) 24x is an integer x can be any factor of 24 1, 2, 4, 3, 6, 8, 12, 24 So x may or may not be a terminating decimal. (2) 28x is an integer x can be any factor of 28 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28 So x may or may not be a terminating decimal Combining both statements, only 4 is common between these two. Hence, combining the statements we get one digit that could be the denominator 4. C is the answer
_________________
I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+



Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2014
Posts: 87

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2016, 03:48
Bunuel I am sorry I can not get the combining statements. We do not need to prove that n is a multiple of 7 ? another question regarding the denominator, is it enough to be 2s or 5s to terminate X as decimal or 2s * 5s is a must.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59039

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 May 2016, 03:59
hatemnag wrote: Bunuel I am sorry I can not get the combining statements. We do not need to prove that n is a multiple of 7 ? another question regarding the denominator, is it enough to be 2s or 5s to terminate X as decimal or 2s * 5s is a must. From (1) we have that \(x=\frac{m}{24}=\frac{m}{2^3*3}\). If m is a multiple of 3, then 3 in the denominator will be reduced and x will be a terminating decimal. Similarly, from (2) we have that \(x=\frac{n}{28}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\). If n is a multiple of 7, then 7 in the denominator will be reduced and x will be a terminating decimal. The answer to your other question is yes, if a fraction has only 2's or 5's in the denominator it'll terminate. Check Terminating and Recurring Decimals Problems in our Special Questions Directory. Hope it helps.
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 265

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2017, 23:37
Bunuel wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?(1) 24x is an integer > \(24x=m\), where m an integer > \(x=\frac{m}{24}=\frac{m}{2^3*3}\), If m is a multiple of 3, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (2) 28x is an integer > \(28x=n\), where n an integer > \(x=\frac{n}{28}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\), If n is a multiple of 7, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) \(x=\frac{m}{2^3*3}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\) > \(\frac{m}{n}=\frac{2*3}{7}\) > m IS a multiple of 3 (as well as n IS multiple of 7). Sufficient. Answer: C. Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced. Questions testing this concept: http://gmatclub.com/forum/doesthedeci ... 89566.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/anydecimalt ... 01964.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/ifabcdan ... 25789.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/700question94641.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/isrs2isa ... 91360.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/plexplain89566.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/whichofthe ... 88937.htmlHope it helps. hi man since 0<x<1, say x is a proper fraction .... taking 2 statements together, x cannot be 1/3, as 3 can divide 24, but cannot divide 28... in the same line of reasoning, x cannot be 1/7, as 7 can divide 28, but cannot divide 24... So, for both of the two statements to hold true, x cannot be 3 and/or 7, thus we are left with only 2s in the denominator. Sufficient .... please say to me whether the reasoning is okay.... thanks in advance, man ...



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59039

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2017, 23:49
gmatcracker2017 wrote: Bunuel wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?(1) 24x is an integer > \(24x=m\), where m an integer > \(x=\frac{m}{24}=\frac{m}{2^3*3}\), If m is a multiple of 3, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (2) 28x is an integer > \(28x=n\), where n an integer > \(x=\frac{n}{28}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\), If n is a multiple of 7, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) \(x=\frac{m}{2^3*3}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\) > \(\frac{m}{n}=\frac{2*3}{7}\) > m IS a multiple of 3 (as well as n IS multiple of 7). Sufficient. Answer: C. Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced. Questions testing this concept: http://gmatclub.com/forum/doesthedeci ... 89566.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/anydecimalt ... 01964.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/ifabcdan ... 25789.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/700question94641.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/isrs2isa ... 91360.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/plexplain89566.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/whichofthe ... 88937.htmlHope it helps. hi man since 0<x<1, say x is a proper fraction .... taking 2 statements together, x cannot be 1/3, as 3 can divide 24, but cannot divide 28... in the same line of reasoning, x cannot be 1/7, as 7 can divide 28, but cannot divide 24... So, for both of the two statements to hold true, x cannot be 3 and/or 7, thus we are left with only 2s in the denominator. Sufficient .... please say to me whether the reasoning is okay.... thanks in advance, man ... Yes, x, when reduced to its simplest form must have 2 or 2^2 in the denominator.
_________________



Senior Manager
Status: love the club...
Joined: 24 Mar 2015
Posts: 265

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Sep 2017, 02:42
Bunuel wrote: gmatcracker2017 wrote: Bunuel wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?(1) 24x is an integer > \(24x=m\), where m an integer > \(x=\frac{m}{24}=\frac{m}{2^3*3}\), If m is a multiple of 3, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (2) 28x is an integer > \(28x=n\), where n an integer > \(x=\frac{n}{28}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\), If n is a multiple of 7, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) \(x=\frac{m}{2^3*3}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\) > \(\frac{m}{n}=\frac{2*3}{7}\) > m IS a multiple of 3 (as well as n IS multiple of 7). Sufficient. Answer: C. Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced. Questions testing this concept: http://gmatclub.com/forum/doesthedeci ... 89566.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/anydecimalt ... 01964.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/ifabcdan ... 25789.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/700question94641.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/isrs2isa ... 91360.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/plexplain89566.htmlhttp://gmatclub.com/forum/whichofthe ... 88937.htmlHope it helps. hi man since 0<x<1, say x is a proper fraction .... taking 2 statements together, x cannot be 1/3, as 3 can divide 24, but cannot divide 28... in the same line of reasoning, x cannot be 1/7, as 7 can divide 28, but cannot divide 24... So, for both of the two statements to hold true, x cannot be 3 and/or 7, thus we are left with only 2s in the denominator. Sufficient .... please say to me whether the reasoning is okay.... thanks in advance, man ... Yes, x, when reduced to its simplest form must have 2 or 2^2 in the denominator. thanks man .. you are great ..



Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 7

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jun 2019, 09:22
Bunuel wrote: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating decimal?
(1) 24x is an integer > \(24x=m\), where m an integer > \(x=\frac{m}{24}=\frac{m}{2^3*3}\), If m is a multiple of 3, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient.
(2) 28x is an integer > \(28x=n\), where n an integer > \(x=\frac{n}{28}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\), If n is a multiple of 7, then the answer is YES, else the answer is NO. Not sufficient.
(1)+(2) \(x=\frac{m}{2^3*3}=\frac{n}{2^2*7}\) > \(\frac{m}{n}=\frac{2*3}{7}\) > m IS a multiple of 3 (as well as n IS multiple of 7). Sufficient.
Answer: C.
Theory: Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^2\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).
Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.
For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal.
We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.
Hope it helps. Hello Bunuel For the above question, could you see if below method works : Since both 28x and 24 x are integers ; their difference should be an integer as well; which means 4x is an integer Hence: x = integer /2square (always terminating )



Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2016
Posts: 232

Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jun 2019, 23:21
Sneakysam wrote: thebloke wrote: since the question asks "is it possible", wouldn't the answer be D since .5 is a terminating decimal and 24*.5=12, and 28*.5=24? i agree with this. The way it is phrased, it should be D. I understand how the answer C is achieved, but I don't think this question is worded well.... The fact that a terminating decimal is possible should be enough. The only way, in my mind that C is correct is if the question asks "is X a terminating decimal?". even i agree with you possibility doesn't means that you need to be certain. This question need to be phrased properly.




Re: If 0 < x < 1, is it possible to write x as a terminating dec
[#permalink]
20 Jun 2019, 23:21



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 21 posts ]



