GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Feb 2019, 14:52

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.
• Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT

If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 53
Schools: Columbia(RD-ding w/o int),
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 28 Mar 2017, 08:46
2
16
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (01:14) correct 38% (01:19) wrong based on 560 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways.
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible.
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution.
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk.
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead.

Originally posted by smashzone on 27 Nov 2009, 22:04.
Last edited by HKD1710 on 28 Mar 2017, 08:46, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 87
Location: Mumbai
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Nov 2009, 00:31
It is C. Since here it is assumed as walking to be only soultion to driving to reduce pollution.
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 736
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Nov 2009, 01:37
yes..it makes sense as conclusion says

Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

if we negate C

Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 15
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2009, 03:18
2
IMo it is E .
The conclusion states that if people choose to walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so ..
It means that there exist people who drive when they could walk ..

We are not considering other possible alternatves , the scope of the argument is limited to choosing between walking and driving ..
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 323
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2009, 11:21
E is a classic shell game.

If people could walk whenever it is feasible, then pollution is greatly reduced.
walking alone reduces pollution? consider biking as well!!!!

So C is the answer, author is assuming that walking in the only way to reduce pollution. He is totally ill-concerned of other alternatives.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 77
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Nov 2009, 20:03
Agree with E.
Can't be C because even if walking is not the only feasible alternative, the fact that walking can reduce pollution may be still true.
_________________

http://www.online-stopwatch.com/
http://gmatsentencecorrection.blogspot.com/

Intern
Joined: 24 Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Nov 2009, 06:06
smashzone wrote:
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways.
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible.
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution.
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk.
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead.

E for sure.

A - Has nothing to do with driving.
B - This actually weakens the argument
C - "Only" is too strong a word and there is nothing stated in the premise or conclusion that assumes this
D - Weakens argument
E - Correct answer. Is closely related to the premise and the conclusion.
Manager
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 155
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Apr 2012, 02:43
2
2
Negation for sometimes is never
People never drive when it is feasible to walk instead. Thus they already try to walk when they can but the polution has not decrease-> against the conclusion. Thus it is E
Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2010
Posts: 37
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 May 2012, 22:51
3
smashzone wrote:
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways.
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible.
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution.
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk.
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead.

Ans Exp

Here the conclusion:- then pollution will be greatly reduced so in an assumption question we should always support the conclusion so we should prove that the pollution would be decreases if which of the following is done here i use Negation technique for each option

a. Cutting down on pollution can not be achieved in a variety of ways. so this statement is showing that pollution cannot be reduced which is quite opposite to the conclusion so eliminate it
b.Taking public transportation rather than driving is always feasible.i negated this choice by eliminating not so by negating this option states that taking public transportation system rather than driving is feasible so if people follow this then pollution get reduced but we don't know that people are following this so we cannot conclude that pollution reduces so eliminate this option.
c. Walking is the not only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution. so this statement after negation states that there are another methods to reduce pollution so by this we cannot definitely say that pollution can be reduced as we don't know that other ways are most effective ways to reduce pollution that walking so eliminate this.
d.There are people who never drive but who often don't walk so by negating this option says that some people will never drive and never walk so the pollution from such people will neither increase or decrease, so eliminate this option.
e.People sometimes don't drive when it is feasible to walk instead, so by negation this option states that when people have chance of walking they walk they use vehicle only when walking is not feasible so by such people the pollution can be reduced to some extent so which supports the conclusion so the Answer option is e.

Hope it's clear.
Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 119
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 590 Q28 V38
GPA: 2.54
WE: Accounting (Hospitality and Tourism)
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 May 2012, 14:08
Would not C be the classical shell game because it restates two parts of the premise and combines them in an answer.

IMO E
_________________

4/28 GMATPrep 42Q 36V 640

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 41
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 May 2012, 14:44
smashzone wrote:
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore walk wheneveif people would r it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways.
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible.
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution.
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk.
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead.

HELLO
my analysis
this is a conditional statement if p then q
the conclusion is if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.
evidences If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise

A so what
B outside the scope we are talking about walking instead of driving as a pollution reduction
D OPPOSITE
C AND E ARE possible
BUT E the sometimes limits the possibilty of switching to walking
hence c Seems better

HOPE IT HELPS

best regards
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 70
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 May 2012, 08:16
smashzone wrote:
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways.
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible.
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution.
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk.
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead.

According to me C is the correct answer.
Explanation--> If there could have been or if there is any other way that could result in a reduction in pollution, then pollution reduced due to walking alone is of no use. On the other hand if walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution, then pollution would greatly be reduced by only walking.
Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 6
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 May 2012, 23:17
if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so instead of driving, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

Possible Assumptions: (1)Like walking there is no other alternative that results greatly in a reduction in pollution (It means there are many alternatives but walking is the the best)
(2) It is feasible (at least for sometimes)for people to choose to walk instead of driving.

But, (C)Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution. CROSS OUT
Intern
Status: Trying to crack GMAT
Joined: 17 May 2012
Posts: 29
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT Date: 07-11-2012
GPA: 3.82
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 May 2012, 23:53
1
Wow..lot of mixed opinions on this one.

Everyone seems to agree that it cannot be A,B or D.

So, here are my 2 cents on C and E.

IMO it should be E since argument states:
1. Cars emit pollution
2. People drive cars.
2. People walk, pollution low.
3. If feasible for people to walk, pollution low.

So, the (1st) assumption that jumps out to me is: people don't always walk. So, E comes closest.

Now, why not C, the argument never ONCE stated that walking is the only solution, it just said pollution will be greatly reduced...NOT most reduced.

Always make a habit to avoid extreme cases such as this one in assumption choices.(Or atleast keep them in the back of your head).

Hope I helped.
_________________

“When I was young I observed that nine out of ten things I did were failures, so I did ten times more work.” ~ Bernard Shaw

Kudos me if I helped you in any way.

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 129
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 May 2012, 02:24
2
A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways. - Too generalised statement to be an assumption - Incorrect
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible. - No mention of public transportation in the premise - Incorrect
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution. - Usage of word "only" is too strong in the present context. Cannot qualify to be an assumption - Incorrect
D) There are people who never drive but who often walk. - Passage is talking about the people who drive but not who does not - Incorrect
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead. - Author concludes that if people walk when it is feasible for them to do so, the pollution will be reduced substancially. To state this, it can be assumed that though people can walk small distances, they still tend to drive which contributes to the pollution. - Correct

Hope the explanation helps.
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 108
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 May 2012, 10:31
in battle between C and E I chose the later.
_________________

FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!

SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1592
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2017, 09:45
A,C and D are out for sure.
B is right if this question has the causal relationship. Here, ones do not need to eliminate other possibilities.
E is left. E fills the gap and has direct link.
VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1284
If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Dec 2018, 02:29
TIME TAKEN 1 MIN. 2 SEC

If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one less vehicle emitting pollution into the air than there would be otherwise. Therefore if people would walk whenever it is feasible for them to do so, then pollution will be greatly reduced.

So the more number of people will walk, the less pollution will be.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A) Cutting down on pollution can be achieved in a variety of ways. ( out of scope is not mentioned)
B) Taking public transportation rather than driving is not always feasible. ( out of scope is not mentioned)
C) Walking is the only feasible alternative to driving that results in a reduction in pollution. ( You cant assume this. because riding a bike could also be a way to reduce pollution. Hence out of scope.

D) There are people who never drive but who often walk. ( it is not mentioned. out of scope.)
E) People sometimes drive when it is feasible to walk instead. ( correct. in the argument we know that some people walk. otherwise if there were not people who walk, then what is the point of discussing vehicles ?
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 41
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Feb 2019, 07:06
If i negate E, people never drive when it is feasible to walk. How will this destroy the argument?

Also confused between E and C.
Orion Representative
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 353
Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Feb 2019, 07:15
1
Top Contributor
mallya12 wrote:
If i negate E, people never drive when it is feasible to walk. How will this destroy the argument?

Also confused between E and C.

If you look at the conclusion, it's that "pollution will be greatly reduced." And the major premise to get there is essentially that "people can choose to walk instead of driving (which causes pollution)."

If you negate E and get "people never choose to drive when they could just walk instead" then there's no reduction in pollution - no one ever chooses to drive, so there is no driving-based pollution currently happening in those cases. People are already walking in every one of those situations, so the proposal in the argument won't lead to any reduction in pollution - all of that potential reduction is already factored in to the current level of pollution.
_________________

Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save \$100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Re: If a person chooses to walk rather than drive, there is one   [#permalink] 08 Feb 2019, 07:15

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by