Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The answer is E.
The statement I doesnt make sense with "Z" and non mention of T.
And for Statement II, there are both yes and no answers.

like 9 = 3^2 where 2 is not a factor of 9.
also 27 = 3^3 where 3 is a factor of 27.

On combining statements I and II,
n = 3^(n-z)
n=3^n/3^z
n= t/3^z (t= 3^n, from statement II)
For all postive integers of Z (including Zero), n is a factor of T
But for negative integers, we can only say that n is multiple of T, but not the factor.

Re: DS- Positive integers and factors - Sounds easy [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Jan 2011, 16:20

1

This post received KUDOS

Sorry for pulling up this old thread, but I googled it because it is a question in the OG12 and I would never come up with an approach like that in the OG12. The initial post states the question incorrectly. Instead of a z, that is subtracted in the exponent, it is actually a 2. You can find the question on p. 310 #66 in the OG12.

Well, it makes sense to me that the answer is C, but not by dividing statement (1) by (2)?! I see that each of the statements are not sufficient considered solely, but instead of that weird approach, I would find out that n in the first statement has to be 3, which goes along with statement (2), since 3 is a factor of 27.

Isn't it true that the questions in the OG are arranged from easy to tough in the particular sections? Sometimes I need five secs for one of the lower questions and then others like these take, if you can solve it at all, a decent amount of time.

Re: DS- Positive integers and factors - Sounds easy [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jan 2011, 09:13

I think the answer should be C. From (1) we can find it that n will always be multiple of 3, or n can be 1. if put this in (2), it clearly means that n will be a factor of t. n can be 1,3,9,27 etc... and 3(exp)1,3,9,27 will always be multiple of n and 3.

Sorry for pulling up this old thread, but I googled it because it is a question in the OG12 and I would never come up with an approach like that in the OG12. The initial post states the question incorrectly. Instead of a z, that is subtracted in the exponent, it is actually a 2. You can find the question on p. 310 #66 in the OG12.

Well, it makes sense to me that the answer is C, but not by dividing statement (1) by (2)?! I see that each of the statements are not sufficient considered solely, but instead of that weird approach, I would find out that n in the first statement has to be 3, which goes along with statement (2), since 3 is a factor of 27.

Isn't it true that the questions in the OG are arranged from easy to tough in the particular sections? Sometimes I need five secs for one of the lower questions and then others like these take, if you can solve it at all, a decent amount of time.

hello Bunuel, How'd you figure it out in statement 1 that n=3. i do comprehend that n must be 3 but i cant figure it out by doing algebra.

please help

You can find that by trial and error: n=1 and n=2 does not satisfy n = 3^(n-2), but n=3 does. Now, if n>3 (4, 5, 6, ...), then RHS is always greater than LHS, so n=3 is the only solution.

You can solve this problem without finding the value of n in (1):

Re: If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2014, 06:01

is n a factor of t? is t/n= integer ?

statement 1 : n= 3^(n-2) nothing is given about t... statement is insufficient

statement 2 : t=3^n let n=2, then t=9 n is not a factor of t .... false let n=3, then t=27 n is a factor of t .... true statement is insufficient

both statements combined n= 3^(n-2)... given n=3^n/3^2 n=t/3^2 ..... (replacing 3^n by t as given in statement 2) t/n= 3^2 t/n= integer Therefore n is a factor of t.

Re: If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jan 2015, 02:07

Bunuel wrote:

selines wrote:

Sorry for pulling up this old thread, but I googled it because it is a question in the OG12 and I would never come up with an approach like that in the OG12. The initial post states the question incorrectly. Instead of a z, that is subtracted in the exponent, it is actually a 2. You can find the question on p. 310 #66 in the OG12.

Well, it makes sense to me that the answer is C, but not by dividing statement (1) by (2)?! I see that each of the statements are not sufficient considered solely, but instead of that weird approach, I would find out that n in the first statement has to be 3, which goes along with statement (2), since 3 is a factor of 27.

Isn't it true that the questions in the OG are arranged from easy to tough in the particular sections? Sometimes I need five secs for one of the lower questions and then others like these take, if you can solve it at all, a decent amount of time.

If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ?

(1) n = 3^(n-2) --> n=3 (only integer solution for this equation), but we know nothing about t, so this statement is not sufficient.

(2) t = 3^n --> if n=1 then the answer will be YES but if n=2 then t=9 and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) As n=3 then t=3^n=27 and the answer to the question will be YES as 3 is a factor of 27. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

---- I think this question is mathematically a wrong question. The equation n=3^(n-2) does not qualified for any existing integer. Can you find any integer that can put this equation for n and get n=3^(n-2)????? This question does not make sense for me.

Sorry for pulling up this old thread, but I googled it because it is a question in the OG12 and I would never come up with an approach like that in the OG12. The initial post states the question incorrectly. Instead of a z, that is subtracted in the exponent, it is actually a 2. You can find the question on p. 310 #66 in the OG12.

Well, it makes sense to me that the answer is C, but not by dividing statement (1) by (2)?! I see that each of the statements are not sufficient considered solely, but instead of that weird approach, I would find out that n in the first statement has to be 3, which goes along with statement (2), since 3 is a factor of 27.

Isn't it true that the questions in the OG are arranged from easy to tough in the particular sections? Sometimes I need five secs for one of the lower questions and then others like these take, if you can solve it at all, a decent amount of time.

If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ?

(1) n = 3^(n-2) --> n=3 (only integer solution for this equation), but we know nothing about t, so this statement is not sufficient.

(2) t = 3^n --> if n=1 then the answer will be YES but if n=2 then t=9 and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) As n=3 then t=3^n=27 and the answer to the question will be YES as 3 is a factor of 27. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

---- I think this question is mathematically a wrong question. The equation n=3^(n-2) does not qualified for any existing integer. Can you find any integer that can put this equation for n and get n=3^(n-2)????? This question does not make sense for me.

Have you read the very post you are quoting??? Please re-read!
_________________

Quick Algebra question for Statement 1&2 combined:

If I plug in n = 3^(n-2) into t = 3^n I get: n = 3^(3^(n-2))

when I rewrite it I eventually come to 3^3n * 1/3^6 = t

However this does not help me in any way... Where am i going wrong?

The highlighted steps are out of Sink

\(a^{(b^c)}\) is NOT equal to \(a^b*a^c\)

Whereas, \((a^b)^c\) = \(a^b*a^c\)

i.e. \(3^{(3^{(n-2)})}\) is NOT same as \(3^{3n} * 1/3^6\)
_________________

Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

Quick Algebra question for Statement 1&2 combined:

If I plug in n = 3^(n-2) into t = 3^n I get: n = 3^(3^(n-2))

when I rewrite it I eventually come to 3^3n * 1/3^6 = t

However this does not help me in any way... Where am i going wrong?

The highlighted steps are out of Sink

\(a^{(b^c)}\) is NOT equal to \(a^b*a^c\)

Whereas, \((a^b)^c\) = \(a^b*a^c\)

i.e. \(3^{(3^{(n-2)})}\) is NOT same as \(3^{3n} * 1/3^6\)

Thank you, so the only way would be to plug in values for n for \(3^{(3^{(n-2)})}\) ?

Or is there any way to rewrite this?

There are three ways

1) Plug-in the Values from Options 2) Take Logarithm on both sides and then solve further 3) Change the method and follow the methods given in other explanations

Third seems the Best to me

I hope it Helps!
_________________

Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

Re: If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Jul 2015, 00:01

GMATinsight wrote:

There are three ways

1) Plug-in the Values from Options 2) Take Logarithm on both sides and then solve further 3) Change the method and follow the methods given in other explanations

Third seems the Best to me

I hope it Helps!

It does Option 3) should indeed be the way to go, however when I first solved the problem I just did not see it happens...

Re: If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ? [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Sep 2016, 22:59

Statement 1: n=3^(n-2). No correlation with 't' is mentioned. Hence, insufficient.

Statement 2: t=3^n. Take n=1, then n is a factor of t. However, n=2 is not a factor of t. Hence, insufficient.

Combined: St:1 can be re-written as, n=3^n.3^-2, with information from statement 2, n=t.3^-2, n=t/9. Given that n&t are positive integers, the information is sufficient.

If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t ?

(1) n = 3^(n-2) (2) t = 3^n

We need to determine whether t/n = integer

Statement One Alone:

n = 3^(n - 2)

Since we do not have any information regarding t, statement one alone is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choices A and D.

Statement Two Alone:

t = 3^n

We can substitute some numbers for n. For example, if n = 1, then t = 3^1 = 3 and 1 is a factor of 3. However, if n = 2, then t = 3^2 = 9 but 2 is not a factor of 9. Statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choice B.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using the information from statements one and two, we can substitute 3^(n - 2) for n and 3^n for t in our question: t/n = integer ?

(3^n)/3^(n - 2) = integer ?

Since we are dividing similar bases, we can subtract the exponents and keep the base. Then we have:

3^(n - n + 2) = integer ?

3^2 = integer ?

9 = integer ?

Since 9 IS an integer. We have answered “yes” to the question.

Answer: C
_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart Founder and CEO

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course 500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions