Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 12:17 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 12:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,337
 [13]
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,337
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,337
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,086
Own Kudos:
3,103
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 3,086
Kudos: 3,103
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rajatchopra1994
Joined: 16 Feb 2015
Last visit: 22 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,056
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Location: United States
Posts: 1,056
Kudos: 1,252
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation:

Statement 1:
Standard deviation depends on the number of terms.
Since we have no idea about the number of terms in both sets.
So Insufficient.

Statement 2:
No information about Set X & Set Y
Insufficient.

Together:
Let Set A = {5, 10, 15, 20, 25}
Set B = {3, 6, 9, 12, 15 }
S.D A > S.D B
IMO-C
User avatar
ArunSharma12
Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Jul 2022
Posts: 513
Own Kudos:
1,019
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 513
Kudos: 1,019
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
If set X and set Y consist of more than one element, what is the ratio of the standard deviation of set X to the standard deviation of set Y?

(1) Set X consists of consecutive multiples of 5 and set Y consists of consecutive multiples of 3

(2) The number of elements in sets X and Y are equal

statement 1: X = {5k, 5k+1, 5k+2, 5k+3...}, Y = {3p, 3p+1, 3p+2, 3p+3...}
we do not know the number of elements in each set, it is required to calculate the standard deviation.
not sufficient.

statement 2: number of elements in X = number of elements in Y.
we do not know the anything about the numbers.
not sufficient

combining both statements,
we know X and Y are evenly space sets with equal number of elements. so the ratio of standard deviation will remain same.
consider X = {5,10,15} Y = {3,6,9}
SD(X) = 5 + 0 + 5 / 3 = 10/3
SD(Y) = 3 + 0 + 3 / 3 = 6/3
ratio = 5/3

consider X = {5,10,15,20,25} Y = {3,6,9,12,15}
SD(X) = 10 + 5 + 0 + 5 + 10 / 5 = 30/5
SD(Y) = 6 + 3 + 0 + 3 + 6 / 5 = 18/5
ratio = 5/3

Ans: C
User avatar
MayankSingh
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 289
Own Kudos:
274
 [1]
Given Kudos: 249
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.9
WE:Project Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO C

(1) Set X consists of consecutive multiples of 5 and set Y consists of consecutive multiples of 3

Since Standard deviation depends on n number of element, and here no. of elements are unknown.
So, this statement is not sufficient.


(2) The number of elements in sets X and Y are equal

We only know about the no. of elements but no idea about the elements in the set.
So, this statement is not sufficient.


Together
Let Set X= { 5,10,15} & Y={ 3,6,9}
SD (X) = √(5^2+5^2)/3 & SD (Y) = √(3^2+3^2)/3
Req Ratio = √50/18 = √25/9

But , if Let Set X= { 5,10,15,20,25} & Y={ 3,6,9,12,15}
SD (X) = √(10^2+5^2+5^2+10^2)/5 & SD (Y) = √(6^2+3^2+3^2+6^2)/5
Req Ratio = √250/90 = √50/18 = √25/9


So ,irrespective of the number of terms, the ratio of SD will remain the same.

Sufficient.
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,684
Own Kudos:
1,447
 [1]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,684
Kudos: 1,447
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
If set X and set Y consist of more than one element, what is the ratio of the standard deviation of set X to the standard deviation of set Y?

(1) Set X consists of consecutive multiples of 5 and set Y consists of consecutive multiples of 3
(2) The number of elements in sets X and Y are equal

n of y and x > 1
sdx/y = ?

(1) insufic

x={ie.5,10,15} avg=5
sd=sqrt[[5^2+0^2+(-5)^2]/3]

y={ie.3,6,9} avg=3
sd=sqrt[[3^2+0^2+(-3)^2]/3]

sd of x and y depends on number of elemnts

(2) insufic

n of x and y are equal

(1/2) sufic

since we know the number elements is equal
then we can find their ratios:
sqrt[[5^2+0^2+(-5)^2]/3] divided by
sqrt[[3^2+0^2+(-3)^2]/3]

Ans (C)
User avatar
freedom128
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Last visit: 01 Oct 2020
Posts: 939
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 402
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
Posts: 939
Kudos: 1,356
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1) Number of elements for each set is unknown
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2)
Case 1: X={3,6}, Y={3,6}
Standard deviation of X = Standard deviation of Y
Case 2: X={3,6}, Y={5,10}
Standard deviation of X < Standard deviation of Y
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1)+(2)
Case 1: X={3,6,9}, Y={5,10,15}
Standard deviation of X < Standard deviation of Y
Case 2: X={3,6}, Y={5,10}
Standard deviation of X < Standard deviation of Y
SUFFICIENT

ANS. (C)
User avatar
minustark
Joined: 14 Jul 2019
Last visit: 01 Apr 2021
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
398
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Status:Student
Location: United States
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
GPA: 3.9
WE:Education (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
Posts: 469
Kudos: 398
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Competition Mode Question



If set X and set Y consist of more than one element, what is the ratio of the standard deviation of set X to the standard deviation of set Y?

(1) Set X consists of consecutive multiples of 5 and set Y consists of consecutive multiples of 3

(2) The number of elements in sets X and Y are equal

1) When set X = {5,10}, the SD is [(2.5)^2+(2.5)^2]/2 or, 12.5/2 = 6.25. When set Y = {0,3}, SD = [(1.5)^2+(1.5)^2]/2 = 2.25. When Set Y = {3,6,9}, SD is [3^2+0+3^2}/3 =6. So, for different number of elements the ratio will vary. not sufficient.

2) SD depends on the value of each element in the set. Not sufficient

Together, from the first example in statement 1, we can find the ratio when there are 2 elements in each set. The ratio is : 6.25 : 2.25 or, 1.25: .45. Now, lets examine when there are 3 elements. X= {0,5,10}, SD= (25+25)/3 = 50/3 and Y ={3,6,9}, SD= 6. Ratio is 50 : 18 or, 25 : 9. or, 1.25 : .45 (divided by 20). So, if know the nature of the set and the number of elements, we can find the ratio of the SDs. Sufficient.

C is the answer.
User avatar
Poojita
Joined: 30 Dec 2019
Last visit: 02 Oct 2022
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 654
Location: India
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Products:
Schools: LBS MFA "23
Posts: 70
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yashikaaggarwal
Standard Deviation = 1/4*(range)
Range = Highest value-Lowest Value

Statement 1: There can N no. Of integers in both set, making the standard deviation vary with the range. Hence Insufficient

Statement 2: Even if No. Of elements are same in sets. The range can differ so is the SD. Insufficient

Statement 1&2 together since the elements in set is same and the set consists of 3&5 consecutive multiple.
The consecutive set range of multiple of 5 is always greater than consecutive set range of 3 multiples.
Hence the ratio of the standard deviation of set X to the standard deviation of set Y. Will always be in the range of 5:3 (Sufficient)

IMO C

Posted from my mobile device

[quote="yashikaaggarwal"]Standard Deviation = 1/4*(range)
Range = Highest value-Lowest Value
I was not aware of this . Is it a rule or something?
and can you explain the logic behind this please?
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,086
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Poojita
yashikaaggarwal
Standard Deviation = 1/4*(range)
Range = Highest value-Lowest Value

Statement 1: There can N no. Of integers in both set, making the standard deviation vary with the range. Hence Insufficient

Statement 2: Even if No. Of elements are same in sets. The range can differ so is the SD. Insufficient

Statement 1&2 together since the elements in set is same and the set consists of 3&5 consecutive multiple.
The consecutive set range of multiple of 5 is always greater than consecutive set range of 3 multiples.
Hence the ratio of the standard deviation of set X to the standard deviation of set Y. Will always be in the range of 5:3 (Sufficient)

IMO C

Posted from my mobile device

yashikaaggarwal
Standard Deviation = 1/4*(range)
Range = Highest value-Lowest Value
I was not aware of this . Is it a rule or something?
and can you explain the logic behind this please?
It's a formula for getting SD using range.
I don't know the logic behind it, too lazy to draw all logic given this simple formula is easily memorable, but you can Google "SD formula using Range".
There is a whole definition and logic behind it.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

Competition Mode Question



If set X and set Y consist of more than one element, what is the ratio of the standard deviation of set X to the standard deviation of set Y?

(1) Set X consists of consecutive multiples of 5 and set Y consists of consecutive multiples of 3

(2) The number of elements in sets X and Y are equal


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions

I think this question did not get precise solution, so bumping up for more discussion.

IanStewart do you think this one is out of scope for the GMAT? Thank you!
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,989
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,989
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
First, because some of the discussion in this thread might be misleading: it is certainly not true that "standard deviation = (1/4)*range". That's almost never going to be true, in fact. It might produce a decent approximation of standard deviation for certain types of sets, but that's all it might do.

Bunuel

IanStewart do you think this one is out of scope for the GMAT? Thank you!

I've seen all of the relevant concepts tested in one official question or another, so I wouldn't say it's out of scope, but I'd be surprised to see an official question precisely like this one, just because official standard deviation questions are usually pretty straightforward.

In this question, knowing only that a set consists, say, of consecutive multiples of 5 doesn't tell us much about its standard deviation. The standard deviation of {5, 10}, for example, is just 2.5 (because every element is 2.5 away from the mean) but the standard deviation of {5, 10, 15, ..., 990, 995, 1000} for example is much bigger than 2.5, because most values in the set are very far from the mean. So we have no hope of answering this question without using Statement 2, but Statement 2 alone is clearly insufficient (we know nothing about what is in the sets), so the answer is C or E.

Using both Statements, if each set contains n elements, then we can first imagine we have a set of the first n consecutive positive integers. Say that set has a standard deviation of s. If we multiply every value in that set by 3, to get a set of n consecutive multiples of 3, we'll be 'stretching out' the distances in the set by a factor of 3, which will multiply the standard deviation by 3. So that set of n consecutive multiples of 3 will have a standard deviation of 3s. Similarly, if we multiply all of our n consecutive integers by 5 to get a set of n consecutive multiples of 5, our standard deviation will become 5s. The ratio of these standard deviations is 5s/3s = 5/3. So the number of values in the sets doesn't matter, and the two statements are sufficient together, and the answer is C.

Note that it doesn't matter how big our multiples are; the set {5, 10, 15, 20} has the same standard deviation as {90, 95, 100, 105}, because they're spaced the same way, so we can answer the question just by imagining our two sets consist of the first n positive multiples of 3 and of 5 respectively.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,337
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
First, because some of the discussion in this thread might be misleading: it is certainly not true that "standard deviation = (1/4)*range". That's almost never going to be true, in fact. It might produce a decent approximation of standard deviation for certain types of sets, but that's all it might do.

Bunuel

IanStewart do you think this one is out of scope for the GMAT? Thank you!

I've seen all of the relevant concepts tested in one official question or another, so I wouldn't say it's out of scope, but I'd be surprised to see an official question precisely like this one, just because official standard deviation questions are usually pretty straightforward.

In this question, knowing only that a set consists, say, of consecutive multiples of 5 doesn't tell us much about its standard deviation. The standard deviation of {5, 10}, for example, is just 2.5 (because every element is 2.5 away from the mean) but the standard deviation of {5, 10, 15, ..., 990, 995, 1000} for example is much bigger than 2.5, because most values in the set are very far from the mean. So we have no hope of answering this question without using Statement 2, but Statement 2 alone is clearly insufficient (we know nothing about what is in the sets), so the answer is C or E.

Using both Statements, if each set contains n elements, then we can first imagine we have a set of the first n consecutive positive integers. Say that set has a standard deviation of s. If we multiply every value in that set by 3, to get a set of n consecutive multiples of 3, we'll be 'stretching out' the distances in the set by a factor of 3, which will multiply the standard deviation by 3. So that set of n consecutive multiples of 3 will have a standard deviation of 3s. Similarly, if we multiply all of our n consecutive integers by 5 to get a set of n consecutive multiples of 5, our standard deviation will become 5s. The ratio of these standard deviations is 5s/3s = 5/3. So the number of values in the sets doesn't matter, and the two statements are sufficient together, and the answer is C.

Note that it doesn't matter how big our multiples are; the set {5, 10, 15, 20} has the same standard deviation as {90, 95, 100, 105}, because they're spaced the same way, so we can answer the question just by imagining our two sets consist of the first n positive multiples of 3 and of 5 respectively.

Thank you. This one is my question and I was worried it might be too hard for the GMAT.
User avatar
IN2MBB2PE
Joined: 20 Aug 2020
Last visit: 17 Feb 2024
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 130
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
First, because some of the discussion in this thread might be misleading: it is certainly not true that "standard deviation = (1/4)*range". That's almost never going to be true, in fact. It might produce a decent approximation of standard deviation for certain types of sets, but that's all it might do.

Bunuel

IanStewart do you think this one is out of scope for the GMAT? Thank you!

I've seen all of the relevant concepts tested in one official question or another, so I wouldn't say it's out of scope, but I'd be surprised to see an official question precisely like this one, just because official standard deviation questions are usually pretty straightforward.

In this question, knowing only that a set consists, say, of consecutive multiples of 5 doesn't tell us much about its standard deviation. The standard deviation of {5, 10}, for example, is just 2.5 (because every element is 2.5 away from the mean) but the standard deviation of {5, 10, 15, ..., 990, 995, 1000} for example is much bigger than 2.5, because most values in the set are very far from the mean. So we have no hope of answering this question without using Statement 2, but Statement 2 alone is clearly insufficient (we know nothing about what is in the sets), so the answer is C or E.

Using both Statements, if each set contains n elements, then we can first imagine we have a set of the first n consecutive positive integers. Say that set has a standard deviation of s. If we multiply every value in that set by 3, to get a set of n consecutive multiples of 3, we'll be 'stretching out' the distances in the set by a factor of 3, which will multiply the standard deviation by 3. So that set of n consecutive multiples of 3 will have a standard deviation of 3s. Similarly, if we multiply all of our n consecutive integers by 5 to get a set of n consecutive multiples of 5, our standard deviation will become 5s. The ratio of these standard deviations is 5s/3s = 5/3. So the number of values in the sets doesn't matter, and the two statements are sufficient together, and the answer is C.

Note that it doesn't matter how big our multiples are; the set {5, 10, 15, 20} has the same standard deviation as {90, 95, 100, 105}, because they're spaced the same way, so we can answer the question just by imagining our two sets consist of the first n positive multiples of 3 and of 5 respectively.


Hi IanStewart Bunuel - will that ratio always be 5:3 in that case? As per the last statement of Ian .... "Note that it doesn't matter how big our multiples are; the set {5, 10, 15, 20} has the same standard deviation as {90, 95, 100, 105}, because they're spaced the same way, so we can answer the question just by imagining our two sets consist of the first n positive multiples of 3 and of 5 respectively."
User avatar
IN2MBB2PE
Joined: 20 Aug 2020
Last visit: 17 Feb 2024
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 130
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Tagging GMATNinja as well, given you asked on the video to be tagged in this question :)
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts