Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:42 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Strengthen|                        
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,073
 [25]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
audi006
Joined: 05 May 2017
Last visit: 08 Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
2,010
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 2,010
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 2,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer is E.
We can solve this question using the

LOGICAL

approach, since strengthening the conclusion is often a matter of identifying hidden assumptions.

The argument is that reducing the number of private planes without radars will decrease traffic accidents. The clear assumption here is that these types of planes are involved in a large part of accidents. This is exactly what E states.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,073
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DavidTutorexamPAL
Bunuel it should be "use", not "sue" - please correct
______________________
Thank you, David. Edited.
User avatar
gmatdordie
Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Last visit: 02 Jun 2020
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
117
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V32
Posts: 87
Kudos: 117
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If the airspace around centrally located airports were restricted to commercial airliners and only those private planes equipped with radar, most of the private-plane traffic would be forced to use outlying airfields. Such a reduction in the amount of private-plane traffic would reduce the risk of midair collision around the centrally located airports.

Conclusion: Reduction in private plane traffic will reduce risk of mid air collision
Pre thinking: 1. any assumption which says that why private plane traffic reduction will help in reducing collision will be strengthener

lets look at answer choices

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn in the second sentence?

A. Commercial airliners are already required by law to be equipped with extremely sophisticated radar systems.

- Are we concerned about if airliners are required to be equipped with extremely sophsticated radar system, really no
irrelevant
B. Centrally located airports are experiencing overcrowded airspace primarily because of sharp increases in commercial-airline traffic.

- restating premise, we already know
C. Many pilots of private planes would rather buy radar equipment than be excluded from centrally located airports.
okay, but it do not explain why reduction in private planes will help in reducing collison
D. The number of midair collisions that occur near centrally located airports has decreased in recent years.

- irrelevant
E. Private planes not equipped with radar systems cause a disproportionately large number of midair collisions around centrally located airports.- this fill the gap and matches our prethinking


hence correct answer :E
User avatar
sriharsha4444
Joined: 06 Jun 2018
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
17
 [2]
Given Kudos: 791
Posts: 39
Kudos: 17
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Firstly, note that Commercial Airlines != Private planes.

There are two entities here: Commercial airlines and private planes (furthermore, within private planes, there are two categories: ones with radar & ones without radar).

Quote:
A. Commercial airliners are already required by law to be equipped with extremely sophisticated radar systems.

- No Impact.
What "commercial airlines" are required by law has no impact on the conclusion that when we enforce the policy that "private planes" with radars are only allowed ->leading to decrease in "private plane" traffic -> leading to decrease in risk of mid-air collision near central airports.

Quote:
B. Centrally located airports are experiencing overcrowded airspace primarily because of sharp increases in commercial-airline traffic.

- more of a weakener.
If "commercial-airline" traffic is the main cause of the overcrowding (and therefore probably the risk of mid-air collision near central airports) then policy on "private planes" -> leading to reduction in "private plane" traffic has little impact on reducing risk of mid-air collision near central airports.

Quote:
C. Many pilots of private planes would rather buy radar equipment than be excluded from centrally located airports.

- weakener.
If private planes without radars are converted to with radars after the policy enforcement , then the traffic would continue at central airports and therefore risk of mid-collision near central airports won't reduce.

Quote:
D. The number of midair collisions that occur near centrally located airports has decreased in recent years.

- No impact.
Sure. It can decrease. But it doesn't strengthen / weaken our belief that reducing "private plane" traffic -> will reduce risk of mid-air collision near central airports

Quote:
E. Private planes not equipped with radar systems cause a disproportionately large number of midair collisions around centrally located airports.

- Strengthener.
If "Private planes" without radars are causing substantial mid-air collision, then reducing their traffic near central airports may reduce the risk of mid-air collision near central airports.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts