Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 06:25 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 06:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,416
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,416
Kudos: 778,504
 [19]
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KrishnakumarKA1
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 403
Own Kudos:
310
 [11]
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 403
Kudos: 310
 [11]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,709
 [5]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,709
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
NidSha
Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Last visit: 08 Dec 2018
Posts: 16
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 16
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u

I had a doubt in the part where you mention -
(2) x^2 is an integer.
if x is an integer, ans is YES
but if x is not an integer, or example x2=3......x=3√x2=3......x=3... ans is NO
insuff

if i assume = x = 16 i.e. integer and because 16 is a perfect sq. we can conclude = odd no. of integers
However if i assume = x = 2 i.e. integer but because 2 is not a perfect sq. we can conclude = no odd no. of integers,

hence unless we know what the exact value of x is (irrespective of integer or not) = would it not be impossible to state whether or not x having odd # of factors?

if i am missing out on a concept, please guide .
TIA
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,709
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NidSha
chetan2u

I had a doubt in the part where you mention -
(2) x^2 is an integer.
if x is an integer, ans is YES
but if x is not an integer, or example x2=3......x=3√x2=3......x=3... ans is NO
insuff

if i assume = x = 16 i.e. integer and because 16 is a perfect sq. we can conclude = odd no. of integers
However if i assume = x = 2 i.e. integer but because 2 is not a perfect sq. we can conclude = no odd no. of integers,

hence unless we know what the exact value of x is (irrespective of integer or not) = would it not be impossible to state whether or not x having odd # of factors?

if i am missing out on a concept, please guide .
TIA


I think you mean x^2 =16 then x=4... X is an integer so x^2 has odd factors
And x^2 =2 then x=√2, here we do not take X as an integer, that is why it is not perfect square.

If you meant X is integer..
X=16, so x^2 =16^2, thus 16^2 is square
X=2 so x^2=2^2=4, again a perfect square
avatar
NidSha
Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Last visit: 08 Dec 2018
Posts: 16
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 16
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u

sorry, i couldn't express concrete,

Ask = does x have odd no. of factors?

i am assuming that i the concept here is right => perfect squares have odd no. of factors | non perfect squares we cant say unless we know the exact number

Hence,
1. if x^sq = 256 ; hence x = 16 and integer; and yes, going by the conceptual assumption because x = perfect square (as 4*4 = 16) => x has odd no. of factors
2. However, if x^sq = 4 ; hence x = 2 and integer; and again, going by the conceptual assumption because x = not a perfect square => x having odd no. of factors is not clear

by the above two example, shouldn't Statement (2) of the question be insufficient irrespective of x being an integer or not?

Thanks for your prompt responses chetan2u
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,709
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NidSha
chetan2u

sorry, i couldn't express concrete,

Ask = does x have odd no. of factors?

i am assuming that i the concept here is right => perfect squares have odd no. of factors | non perfect squares we cant say unless we know the exact number

Hence,
1. if x^sq = 256 ; hence x = 16 and integer; and yes, going by the conceptual assumption because x = perfect square (as 4*4 = 16) => x has odd no. of factors
2. However, if x^sq = 4 ; hence x = 2 and integer; and again, going by the conceptual assumption because x = not a perfect square => x having odd no. of factors is not clear

by the above two example, shouldn't Statement (2) of the question be insufficient irrespective of x being an integer or not?

Thanks for your prompt responses chetan2u


Yes you are absolutely correct in your observation..
If x^2 is an integer, X may be a square or may not be .
However if it is not an integer, it is always NO.
avatar
NidSha
Joined: 30 Apr 2018
Last visit: 08 Dec 2018
Posts: 16
Given Kudos: 85
Posts: 16
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u

Thanks a lot for your help :)
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 885
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 885
Kudos: 1,801
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
If x ≠ 0, does x have an odd number of factors?

(1) √x is an integer.

(2) x^2 is an integer.
Beautiful problem!

\(?\,\,\,\,:\,\,\,\,\,\# \,\,\left( {{\text{positive}}} \right)\,\,{\text{factors}}\,\,{\text{odd}}\,\,{\text{?}}\)

Important: it is not known (pre-statements) whether x is an integer (this is part of the problem)!
If x is not an integer, the answer (=focus) is <NO>, because non-integers don´t have factors (by definition, factors are related to integers only)!

Statement (2) will explore that. Let´s start with it!

\(\left( 2 \right)\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}\\
\,Take\,\,x = \sqrt 2 \,\,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{NO}}} \right\rangle \,\,\,\,\,\, \hfill \\\\
\,Take\,\,x = 1\,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \hfill \\ \\
\end{gathered} \right.\)

\(\left( 1 \right)\,\,\sqrt x \,\,\,\operatorname{int} \,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}\\
x \geqslant 0\,\,\,\,{\text{implicitly}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{x\,\, \ne \,\,0} \,\,\,\,\,x > 0 \hfill \\\\
x\,\, = {\left( {\sqrt x } \right)^2}\,\, = \,\,{\operatorname{int} ^{\,2}} = {\text{perfect}}\,\,{\text{square}} \hfill \\ \\
\end{gathered} \right.\,\)

\(x\,\,{\text{perfect}}\,\,{\text{square}}\,\,\, \geqslant \,\,\,{\text{1}}\,\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\{ \begin{gathered}\\
\,\,x = 1\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\, \hfill \\\\
\,\,x \geqslant 4\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\,{\text{x}}\,{\text{ = }}\,{\text{prime}}{{\text{s}}^{\,{\text{even}}\,{\text{powers}}}}\,\,\, \hfill \\ \\
\end{gathered} \right.\)

\({\text{x}}\,{\text{ = }}\,{\text{prime}}{{\text{s}}^{\,\boxed{{\text{even}}\,\,{\text{powers}}}}}\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,? = \left( {\boxed{{\text{even}}}\, + 1} \right)\,\, \cdot \left( {\boxed{{\text{even}}}\, + 1} \right) \cdot \ldots \cdot \left( {\boxed{{\text{even}}}\, + 1} \right) = {\text{odd}}\,\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,\left\langle {{\text{YES}}} \right\rangle \,\,\)

Important: the explanation above shows the reason why every nonzero perfect square has an odd number of positive factors.

The above follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method.
avatar
Deepshikha007
Joined: 15 May 2018
Last visit: 11 Mar 2020
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 130
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi

I want to know for statement 1, should we not use x=1 as square root of 1 is also 1, an integer. But 1 would have even no of factors. So the statement would not be sufficient.
If the team could please help.
Thank you .

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
KanishkM
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
Posts: 759
Kudos: 503
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deepshikha007
Hi

I want to know for statement 1, should we not use x=1 as square root of 1 is also 1, an integer. But 1 would have even no of factors. So the statement would not be sufficient.
If the team could please help.
Thank you .

I am no expert here,

But isn't factor of 1 is just one i.e. = 1

Even if we take the inline logic for calculating factors
1^(1+1) = 1^(2) = 1

It will still be 1, which is still an odd factor.

Let me know if your query got addressed or not.
avatar
Deepshikha007
Joined: 15 May 2018
Last visit: 11 Mar 2020
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 130
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KanishkM
Deepshikha007
Hi

I want to know for statement 1, should we not use x=1 as square root of 1 is also 1, an integer. But 1 would have even no of factors. So the statement would not be sufficient.
If the team could please help.
Thank you .

I am no expert here,

But isn't factor of 1 is just one i.e. = 1

Even if we take the inline logic for calculating factors
1^(1+1) = 1^(2) = 1

It will still be 1, which is still an odd factor.

Let me know if your query got addressed or not.

I do understand the part that 1 would have just 1 factor hence odd no. of factors.
But if we look at it technically then 1^1+1= 1+1 = 2 , an even number.

So technically its even but logically odd.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,598
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,598
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105416 posts
496 posts