Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 03:39 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 03:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
enigma123
Joined: 25 Jun 2011
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 392
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Status:Finally Done. Admitted in Kellogg for 2015 intake
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: International Business, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V45
Posts: 392
Kudos: 19,303
 [180]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
165
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,466
 [31]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
A4G
Joined: 11 Nov 2013
Last visit: 18 Dec 2013
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
90
 [9]
Given Kudos: 9
GMAT Date: 12-26-2013
GPA: 3.6
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Posts: 13
Kudos: 90
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,466
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,466
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Samirc2
Bunuel
Samirc2


Hi,

Quick question: I do not understand why, when considering the product (x-1)x(x+1), you conclude that one of the factor is divisible by 4.

Let me explain my line of reasoning here: we know x is odd, so both (x-1) and (x+1) are even, hence my conclusion is that (x-1) and (x+1) are each divisible by 2, not by 4. So the only thing I can conclude is that (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 4 and not by 8. Could you please clarify this point?

Thanks

By the way awesome book, thanks for sharing

Sam

Please check here: if-x-3-x-n-and-x-is-a-positive-integer-greater-than-1-is-n-126854.html#p1037233

As you could see from my post, I did check the previous posts and quoted them but I cannot figure out what is wrong with my reasoning.

(x-1) and (x+1) are consecutive even integers, thus one of them will also be divisible by 4, which will make (x-1)(x+1) divisible by 2*4=8
User avatar
nt2010
Joined: 15 Jan 2013
Last visit: 11 Aug 2013
Posts: 110
Own Kudos:
185
 [7]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Looking to improve
GMAT 1: 530 Q43 V20
GMAT 2: 560 Q42 V25
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
Posts: 110
Kudos: 185
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just list out all the even numbers - 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and for this problem x > 0

so consecutive even numbers are 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, ... = 2 x ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,..).. every even number has 2 as a factor and every even number in the listed ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,..) series gives another 2 as a factor. Hence, in a sequence of even numbers one of the numbers always has 4 as a factor.

Hope this helps..
User avatar
audiogal101
Joined: 23 Oct 2012
Last visit: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
37
 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 19
Kudos: 37
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nt2010
Just list out all the even numbers - 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and for this problem x > 0

so consecutive even numbers are 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, ... = 2 x ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,..).. every even number has 2 as a factor and every even number in the listed ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,..) series gives another 2 as a factor. Hence, in a sequence of even numbers one of the numbers always has 4 as a factor.

Hope this helps..

I believe the last statement would be correct only if the sequence starts with even integer 2. For instance, if there are two consecutive even numbers, 0 and 2, then 4 is not a factor. However, if the two consecutive numbers are 2 and 4, then 4 is a factor of 2*4.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,466
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,466
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
audiogal101
nt2010
Just list out all the even numbers - 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and for this problem x > 0

so consecutive even numbers are 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, ... = 2 x ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,..).. every even number has 2 as a factor and every even number in the listed ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,..) series gives another 2 as a factor. Hence, in a sequence of even numbers one of the numbers always has 4 as a factor.

Hope this helps..

I believe the last statement would be correct only if the sequence starts with even integer 2. For instance, if there are two consecutive even numbers, 0 and 2, then 4 is not a factor. However, if the two consecutive numbers are 2 and 4, then 4 is a factor of 2*4.

That's not true.

Zero is divisible by EVERY integer except zero itself, since 0/integer=integer (or, which is the same, zero is a multiple of every integer).

Thus if (x-1)x(x+1)=0*1*2=0, then the product is still divisible by 8.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
sagnik242
Joined: 28 Dec 2013
Last visit: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 47
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(2) x = 4y + 1, where y is an integer --> x=even+odd=odd --> (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 8. Sufficient.

Question : x = even + odd + odd, where does this come from? I think it comes from (2) but I don't get how if that's so.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,466
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,466
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sagnik242
(2) x = 4y + 1, where y is an integer --> x=even+odd=odd --> (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 8. Sufficient.

Question : x = even + odd + odd, where does this come from? I think it comes from (2) but I don't get how if that's so.

\(x = 4y + 1\). Now, \(4y\) is even, because of 4, and 1 is odd, thus \(x=even+odd=odd\).

Does this make sense?
avatar
JsZJ
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Last visit: 03 Feb 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, I don't understand why if x is odd then (x-1)x(x+1) will be divisible by 8*3=24. Can someone pls help?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
778,466
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,466
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
JsZJ
Hi, I don't understand why if x is odd then (x-1)x(x+1) will be divisible by 8*3=24. Can someone pls help?

x^3-x=x(x^2-1)=(x-1)x(x+1), notice that we have the product of three consecutive integers, so one of (x-1), x or (x+1) is divisible by 3. Now, if x=odd, then (x-1) and (x+1) are consecutive even integers, thus one of them will also be divisible by 4, which will make (x-1)(x+1) divisible by 2*4=8 (basically if x=odd then (x-1)x(x+1) will be divisible by 8*3=24).
avatar
himanigahlot
Joined: 21 Mar 2020
Last visit: 10 Apr 2020
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
enigma123
If \(x^3\) – x = n and x is a positive integer greater than 1, is n divisible by 8?

(1) When 3x is divided by 2, there is a remainder.
(2) x = 4y + 1, where y is an integer.

I will really appreciate if you can tell me whether I am right or wrong. I have gone for D as an answer.

Let's simply the question stem a bit:

\(x^3\) - x = n which will give x (\(x^2\)-1) = n which will give (x-1), x and (x+1) = n. Therefore n is a product of 3 consecutive integers.

Now moving on to the statements

Statement 1 implies that x is ODD. Because ODD/EVEN will always end with some remainder.

X is ODD which means that the product will always be divisible by 2 three times and therefore will be divisible by 8.


Statement 2 implies that when x is divided by 4 it leaves a remainder 1 i.e. x is ODD. which is same as above and therefore sufficient.

Therefore for me both statements alone are sufficient to answer this question.

Yes, your reasoning is correct.

If x^3 - x = n and x is a positive integer greater than 1, is n divisible by 8?

x^3-x=x(x^2-1)=(x-1)x(x+1), notice that we have the product of three consecutive integers. Now, if x=odd, then (x-1) and (x+1) are consecutive even integers, thus one of them will also be divisible by 4, which will make (x-1)(x+1) divisible by 2*4=8 (basically if x=odd then (x-1)x(x+1) will be divisible by 8*3=24).

(1) When 3x is divided by 2, there is a remainder --> 3x=odd --> x=odd --> (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 8. Sufficient.

(2) x = 4y + 1, where y is an integer --> x=even+odd=odd --> (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 8. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope it helps.

-------------------------------------------

Here question states "x is a positive integer greater than 1" and in explanation we have focused only on "if x=odd" .I want to why we have not considered "x=even" case.
User avatar
nick1816
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Oct 2018
Last visit: 06 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,849
Own Kudos:
8,239
 [1]
Given Kudos: 707
Location: India
Posts: 1,849
Kudos: 8,239
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
x^3-x = n
x(x^2-1) = n

(x-1)(x)(x+1) =n

n is the product of 3 consecutive numbers.

There are 2 cases when product of 3 consecutive numbers is divisible by 8.

Case 1- when x is odd
Since x is odd, x-1 and x+1 must be even. Also, x-1 and x+1 are 2 consecutive even numbers, so one must be odd multiple of 2 and other is even multiple of 2. Hence, n is always divisible by 8, if x is odd.

Case 2- when x is a multiple of 8.
(As x-1 and x+1 both are odd when x is even, x must be multiple of 8.)

Both statements tells you that x is odd. Hence, Sufficient.




himanigahlot
Bunuel
enigma123
If \(x^3\) – x = n and x is a positive integer greater than 1, is n divisible by 8?

(1) When 3x is divided by 2, there is a remainder.
(2) x = 4y + 1, where y is an integer.

I will really appreciate if you can tell me whether I am right or wrong. I have gone for D as an answer.

Let's simply the question stem a bit:

\(x^3\) - x = n which will give x (\(x^2\)-1) = n which will give (x-1), x and (x+1) = n. Therefore n is a product of 3 consecutive integers.

Now moving on to the statements

Statement 1 implies that x is ODD. Because ODD/EVEN will always end with some remainder.

X is ODD which means that the product will always be divisible by 2 three times and therefore will be divisible by 8.


Statement 2 implies that when x is divided by 4 it leaves a remainder 1 i.e. x is ODD. which is same as above and therefore sufficient.

Therefore for me both statements alone are sufficient to answer this question.

Yes, your reasoning is correct.

If x^3 - x = n and x is a positive integer greater than 1, is n divisible by 8?

x^3-x=x(x^2-1)=(x-1)x(x+1), notice that we have the product of three consecutive integers. Now, if x=odd, then (x-1) and (x+1) are consecutive even integers, thus one of them will also be divisible by 4, which will make (x-1)(x+1) divisible by 2*4=8 (basically if x=odd then (x-1)x(x+1) will be divisible by 8*3=24).

(1) When 3x is divided by 2, there is a remainder --> 3x=odd --> x=odd --> (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 8. Sufficient.

(2) x = 4y + 1, where y is an integer --> x=even+odd=odd --> (x-1)x(x+1) is divisible by 8. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Hope it helps.

-------------------------------------------

Here question states "x is a positive integer greater than 1" and in explanation we have focused only on "if x=odd" .I want to why we have not considered "x=even" case.
User avatar
DanTe02
Joined: 06 Apr 2020
Last visit: 09 Dec 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: Wharton '23
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Schools: Wharton '23
Posts: 121
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
I tried to prove option A ;I understood the logical approach but the mathematical approach is showing a different result
as
x*(x+1)*(x+2)
1)--------------gives us x is odd therefore x is in form of 2k+1 where k->1,2,3,4.....
so substituting and solving
we get 8k^3+12k^2+4k now this term when divided by 8 will leave no remainder only when k is in (2,4,6,8... i.e even)
Hence mathematically its telling me its not necessarily divisble by 8 Can someone help?
User avatar
MBAB123
Joined: 05 Jul 2020
Last visit: 30 Jul 2023
Posts: 563
Own Kudos:
318
 [1]
Given Kudos: 151
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 563
Kudos: 318
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DanTe02
Bunuel
I tried to prove option A ;I understood the logical approach but the mathematical approach is showing a different result
as
x*(x+1)*(x+2)
1)--------------gives us x is odd therefore x is in form of 2k+1 where k->1,2,3,4.....
so substituting and solving
we get 8k^3+12k^2+4k now this term when divided by 8 will leave no remainder only when k is in (2,4,6,8... i.e even)
Hence mathematically its telling me its not necessarily divisble by 8 Can someone help?

Hey a couple of things here. The original expression is (x-1)(x)(x+1). Substituting, x=2k+1 in the original expression.
=> (2k)(2k+1)(2k+2).
=> 2(k)(2k+1)(2)(k+1)
=> 4(k^2+k) (2k+1).
Now, note that you already have 4 in the expression and k^2 + k will always be even, irrespective of whether k is odd or even. You can also try and put k=odd or even at any step and you will ge the same answer.

Hope this helps!
avatar
Saya12345
Joined: 11 Oct 2023
Last visit: 19 Jun 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Products:
Posts: 38
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
x-1 x x+1

statement one gives x is odd
implies x-1 x+1 are consecutive evens
hence, one of then divisible by 2, other divisible by 4
Thus, the entire number is div by 8
-> S1 is sufficient.

S2
x=4y+1
4y 4y+1 4y+1
div by 4 & 2
hence div by 8
S2 is sufficient.

Hence, Ans = D
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,597
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,597
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105408 posts
496 posts