If x and y are positive integers, is x/y

Question

If x and y are positive integers, is x/y < (x+2)/(y+3)?

(1) y > 20
(2) x < 5

viktorija · Answer

Given: x,y >0; x,y are integers.
Question: is x/y<(x+2)/(y+3)? or if we cross-multiply (we can do this because x and y are positive) and simplify we get is 3x<2y?

(1) Insufficient. If x is small then the answer to the question will be yes, but if x is very big and y=21, then answer will be no.
(2) Insufficient. No info about y, so y can be either very small or very big which will yield two different answers.

(1)+(2) Sufficient. If y=21 and x=4, then we get 12< 42, so the answer to the question is no.

Answer C

peachfuzz · Answer

If we simplify the original prompt the question reworded becomes 3x < 2y ?

Statement 1: nothing is given about x; insufficient

Statement 2: nothing is given about y; insufficient

Combined, we know that 3x is always smaller than 2y because y is 21 at its smallest value. x is only 4 at its greatest value.
Sufficient

Answer: C

aniteshgmat1101 · Answer

Answer should be C. As i thought, this problem cannot be dependent on value of any one of the variable. I mean even if y > 20, for x = y given equation does not hold true, and conclusion varies for condition x < y and x > y. So, option A, B and D are out. So, we need values or range for x and y both, and keep an eye on relation between x and y, since the validity of the equation varies depending on conditions: x = y, x > y and x < y. For the given ranges combined, we get only one relation between x and y, i.e. y > x.

Bunuel · Answer

MAGOOSH OFFICIAL SOLUTION: Statement #1: We are adding 2 to the numerator and 3 to the denominator, so we know the resultant fraction will move closer to 2/3. If all we know is that the denominator of the starting fraction is greater than 20, then we have no idea what the size of the starting fraction is: it could be much greater than 2/3, or much smaller than 2/3, depending on the numerator, of which we have no idea. We can draw no conclusion right now. This statement, alone, by itself, is insufficient. Statement #2: Now, all we know is that the numerator of the starting fraction is less than 5 — it could be 4, 3, 2, or 1. We have no idea of the denominator. If y = 50, then we get a very small fraction. But if x = 4 and y = 1, the fraction equals 4, much larger than 2/3. In this statement, we have no information about the denominator, and since we know nothing about the denominator, we know nothing about the size of the starting fraction: it could be either greater or less than 2/3. Therefore, we can draw no conclusion. This statement, alone, by itself, is also insufficient. Now, combine the statements. We know y > 20 and x < 5. Well no matter what values we choose, we are going to have a denominator much smaller than the numerator. The larger possible fraction we could have under these constraints would be 4/21 (largest possible numerator with smallest possible denominator). The fraction 4/21 is much smaller than 1/2, so it’s definitely smaller than 2/3. Any fraction with y > 20 and x < 5 will be less than 2/3. Therefore, adding 2 to the numerator and 3 to the denominator will move the resultant fraction closer to 2/3, which has the net effect of increasing its value. Therefore, the answer to the prompt question is “yes.” Because we can give a definite answer to the prompt, we have sufficient information. Neither statement is sufficient individually, but together, they are sufficient. Answer = C.

msk0657 · Answer

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY...STONY.. Given {x/y} <{{x+2}/{y+3}} cross multiply or mulitiply individual variables we get the same equation... x(y+3) < y(x+2) xy + 3x < yx + 2y 3x < 2y => x/y < 2/3 ? we need to find this. Stat 1: y > 20..no information about x...not sufficient... Stat 2: x < 5..no information about y...not sufficient.. Stat 1 + Stat 2: Now take least y value and greater number from x i.e y = 21 and x = 4 ...since the value is not divisible consider 4/24 = 1/6 < 2/3. Similarly consider some other value let x = 3 and y = 18..these values are exactly divisible, hence consider 1/6 < 2/3 or x = 4 and y = 21 we get result < 2/3....Sufficient.. Hence C is sufficient..

Teerex · Answer

Option C, since the fraction gets closer to 2/3, we need to know values of x and Y to know if 2/3 is greater than or less than x/y.

ryanpri · Answer

sorry can you explain why we need to simplify the x/y < (x+2)/(y+3) to become 3x < 2y, does if we just put the number directly we could get the answear.
Thanks

amanvermagmat · Answer

Hi

The word  simplification  in almost every task does what its supposed to do: - it 'simplifies' the question or makes our task 'simple'.

Eg, if here we look at statement 1, and try to plug in the values straightaway, we will have to put a value of y>20 in the question. So we will write: LHS = x/21. RHS = (x+2)/24
We can see that this on its own doesnt tell us anything unless we know something about x. Or we will have to cross multiply to get 24x on LHS and 21x+42 on RHS.

From statement 2, similarly we will take a value of x less than 5, say 4. So we will substitute x=4 and then again this statement will become insufficient unless we know something about y.

But as you can see, this method of substituting numbers is slightly complicated. Instead if we can just simplify the question stem (as explained by others), all we have to then find is whether x/y < 2/3. And for this we need to know something about both x as well as y. So individual statements are not sufficient on their own.

ryanpri · Answer

Hi

The word  simplification  in almost every task does what its supposed to do: - it 'simplifies' the question or makes our task 'simple'.

Eg, if here we look at statement 1, and try to plug in the values straightaway, we will have to put a value of y>20 in the question. So we will write: LHS = x/21. RHS = (x+2)/24
We can see that this on its own doesnt tell us anything unless we know something about x. Or we will have to cross multiply to get 24x on LHS and 21x+42 on RHS.

From statement 2, similarly we will take a value of x less than 5, say 4. So we will substitute x=4 and then again this statement will become insufficient unless we know something about y.

But as you can see, this method of substituting numbers is slightly complicated. Instead if we can just simplify the question stem (as explained by others), all we have to then find is whether x/y < 2/3. And for this we need to know something about both x as well as y. So individual statements are not sufficient on their own.

Thanks for the explanation,
btw if we crop multiply we can get 
Y=21
24x>21x+42

can i move the "21x" like this:
24x-21x>42
x=42/3

need your enlighment.thanks

amanvermagmat · Answer

Thanks for the explanation, btw if we crop multiply we can get Y=21 24x>21x+42 can i move the "21x" like this: 24x-21x>42 x=42/3 need your enlighment.thanks Hi Ryan In this particular question, you are being asked Whether x/y < (x+2)/(y+3) . We are not given this already. But suppose we are already given that x/y < (x+2)/(y+3) and then we decide to play around with this by substituting the value of y as 21. Then we will write: x/21 < (x+2)/24. Then cross multiplying 24x < 21x + 42. After that Yes we can do as you did. We will write: 24x-21x < 42 or 3x < 42 or x < 42/3 or x < 14 (you have written x=42/3, its not equal it will be x < 42/3) I suggest you first go through the basics of algebra and inequalities. You can go to the following thread by Bunuel and go through the topics of your choice. https://gmatclub.com/forum/ultimate-gma ... 44512.html In this particular case, I was talking about Topic no 7 (algebra) and Topic no 9 (Inequalities)

kakakakaak · Answer

can someone provide with the expalnation brunel talked abbout as I am not aware of the concept sed by brunel... can anyone please elobrate on that

mehtasahil56 · Answer

CAN SOMEONE HELP ME TO KNOW WHEN CAN WE CROSS FACTOR AND WHEN CAN WE NOT?

kakakakaak · Answer

when numbers involved are positive then we can do cross multipication..... here in this question we are specifically mentioned that x and y are positive so we can do cross multipication ........if satisfied with answer give kudos

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

If x and y are positive integers, is x/y < (x+2)/(y+3)?

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards