Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:33 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:33
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,287
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,287
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
4,981
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,981
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
nyashka
Joined: 06 Jan 2019
Last visit: 28 Jun 2019
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
arorni
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2020
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 58
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nyashka
Archit3110
Bunuel
If x is an integer greater than zero but less than integer n, is x is a factor of n?

(1) n is divisible by all integers less than 10.
(2) x is not a multiple of a prime number.


x>0 but n>x
is x factor of n?
#1
n is divisible by all integers less than 10.
value of n = 9! , but x is not sure what it may be
insufficient
#2
x can be 1 only
sufficient
IMO b


could you please explain the second?

Can you please explain? As, 1 can also be multiple of prime number.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
4,981
 [4]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,981
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arorni ; nyashka

given x is an integer >0 but <n so range of x lies 0<x<n also given x & n are integers .. need to determine whether x is a factor of n.
#1
n is divisible by all integers less than 10
possible when n=9! so we can have many values of x cannot be determined , insufficeint

#2
x is not a multiple of a prime number ; or we can say that x is not divisible by any prime no..

The only positive number that isn't divisible by any prime number is 1, any positive integer greater than 1 is either prime or can be broken down into prime numbers eg
x=6;2*3 ; 8; 2*4 so on...
A multiple of a number is integer is when a number is multiplied by another no. for eg ; 2 =2*1 ; 4=2*2 so here 2,4 are multiples of 2
we are given info that x is not a multiple of a prime number only possible integer in that case is 1

hope this helps... :)
avatar
arorni
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2020
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 58
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Archit3110
arorni ; nyashka

given x is an integer >0 but <n so range of x lies 0<x<n also given x & n are integers .. need to determine whether x is a factor of n.
#1
n is divisible by all integers less than 10
possible when n=9! so we can have many values of x cannot be determined , insufficeint

#2
x is not a multiple of a prime number ; or we can say that x is not divisible by any prime no..

The only positive number that isn't divisible by any prime number is 1, any positive integer greater than 1 is either prime or can be broken down into prime numbers eg
x=6;2*3 ; 8; 2*4 so on...
A multiple of a number is integer is when a number is multiplied by another no. for eg ; 2 =2*1 ; 4=2*2 so here 2,4 are multiples of 2
we are given info that x is not a multiple of a prime number only possible integer in that case is 1

hope this helps... :)

Thanks Archit3110..
User avatar
sahibr
Joined: 24 Jun 2018
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 29
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Archit3110

Statement 2 says x is not a multiple of a prime number

That can mean that x is a prime number.

That means x can be 2,3,5,7,11 etc.

X cannot be only 1.
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,981
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sahibr
Archit3110

Statement 2 says x is not a multiple of a prime number

That can mean that x is a prime number.

That means x can be 2,3,5,7,11 etc.

X cannot be only 1.

sahibr
can you tell a number apart from 1 which is not a mutiple of prime no...
User avatar
sahibr
Joined: 24 Jun 2018
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 29
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Archit3110

Any prime number in itself, standing alone is not a multiple of a prime number.

2,3,5,7 etc are not multiples of a prime number.

If the logic is that 2x1 becomes 2 again and hence is a multiple of a prime number then the same logic can be applied to 1 as well.

1 is a multiple of itself.
User avatar
firas92
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 16 Jan 2019
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 616
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
WE:Sales (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 616
Kudos: 1,725
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sahibr
Archit3110

Any prime number in itself, standing alone is not a multiple of a prime number.

2,3,5,7 etc are not multiples of a prime number.

If the logic is that 2x1 becomes 2 again and hence is a multiple of a prime number then the same logic can be applied to 1 as well.

1 is a multiple of itself.

You are right but 1 is neither prime nor composite so as per statement (2), x can be 1

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,586
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,586
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
496 posts