Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.
In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into eff
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 03 Oct 2018, 01:20
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35% (medium)
Question Stats:
65% (01:34) correct 35% (01:58) wrong based on 266 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday, believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was an economy made overproductive by advances in technology.
(A) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was
(B) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation instead of a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was
(C) believing that it was not a temporary expedient but a seeming permanent accommodation to what many observers thought of as a
(D) not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was
(E) not as a temporary expedient but believing it a seemingly permanent accommodation for what many observers thought
Re: In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into eff
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 10 Dec 2010, 03:25
2
1
ajit257 wrote:
. In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday, believing it aseeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was an economy made overpro- ductive by advances in technology.
(A) believing it a seeming permanent accommoda- tion rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was - Two Problems - Believe something to be or Believe that is the correct idiom. And Seeming verbal form isn't correct. Seemingly is the adverb to be used.Seemingly modifies Adjective Premanent which inturn modifies Noun accomodation . Adverb + Adjective + Noun is correct usage here as per author's sense.
(B) believing it a seeming permanent accommoda- tion instead of a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was - Same reason as above. Moreover, rather than is preferred in GMAT.
(C) believing that it was not a temporary expedient but a seeming permanent accommodation to what many observers thought of as a - Tense issue. Past tense not required.
(D) not as a temporary expedient but as a seem- ingly [/color]permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was - Hold. Correct use of Adverb.Hence D OA.
(E) not as a temporary expedient but believing it a seemingly permanent accommodation for what many observers thought - Parallelism problem. Not as .. But as. Eliminate.
I believe this will do justice.
Originally posted by amit2k9 on 08 Dec 2010, 23:23.
Last edited by amit2k9 on 10 Dec 2010, 03:25, edited 1 time in total.
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4685
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into eff
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Dec 2010, 05:35
2
Two things are tested here.
1. Seeming permanent accommodation – an adjective modifying another adjective is grammatically wrong. A, B and C are gone. D and E survive first round
2. In the use of correlative conjunctions such as not…. but, llism has to be maintained. D does it perfectly well by using not as … but as. E fails to maintain llism, by saying not as …. but believing. So E falls by the wayside
D is the one.
_________________
GMAT coaching under able guidance is only half expensive and time-consuming as a self-study in the final reckoning
Re: In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into eff
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2012, 18:23
1
1
Bumping an old thread , nice question
(A) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was Seeming( adjective) incorrectly modifies the noun accommodation, whereas it actually should modify the adjective permanent. To do so, seeming should be changed to adverb seemingly..
(B) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation instead of a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was Same as A,
(C) believing that it was not a temporary expedient but a seeming permanent accommodation to what many observers thought of as a same as A, moreover, thought of as a shows redundancy, thought was is concise.
(D) not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was CORRECT
(E) not as a temporary expedient but believing it a seemingly permanent accommodation for what many observers thought parallelism error, the highlighted parts are not parallel
_________________
Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html
Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367
Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html
Re: In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into eff
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Oct 2018, 01:17
nehanishika wrote:
352. In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought wasan economy made overproductive by advances in technology. (A) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was (B) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation instead of a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was (C) believing that it was not a temporary expedient but a seeming permanent accommodation to what many observers thought of as a (D) not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was (E) not as a temporary expedient but believing it a seemingly permanent accommodation for what many observers thought
Re: In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into eff
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Oct 2018, 01:20
gmat1393 wrote:
nehanishika wrote:
352. In 1933 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into effect a six-hour workday,believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought wasan economy made overproductive by advances in technology. (A) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation rather than a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was (B) believing it a seeming permanent accommodation instead of a temporary expedient for what many observers thought was (C) believing that it was not a temporary expedient but a seeming permanent accommodation to what many observers thought of as a (D) not as a temporary expedient but as a seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was (E) not as a temporary expedient but believing it a seemingly permanent accommodation for what many observers thought
close
65% (01:34) correct 
, nice question
