NandishSS
In an area devoid of volcanic activity, a
discovery has been made by a team of scientists from the University of California that a fragment of the Swiss Alps seems like it came from a depth as far down as 415 miles.
(A) discovery has been made by a team of scientists from the University of California that a fragment of the Swiss Alps seems like it came from a depth as far down
(B) discovery was made by a team of scientists from the University of California who found a fragment of the Swiss Alps that seems like it had come from a depth of as much
(C) team of scientists from the University of California have discovered a fragment of the Swiss Alps that has seemingly come from a depth of as great
(D) team of scientists from the University of California has discovered a fragment of the Swiss Alps that seems to have come from a depth as great
(E) team of scientists from the University of California has made the discovery of a fragment of the Swiss Alps that had seemingly come from a depth as far
the following is correct.
the discover has been made that the fragments of Alperl seemingly came from a long depth
if the main clause is short and that-clause, "that the fragment of..." is close to the noun modified, "discovery", the sentence if fine.
but in choice A, between "discovery" and that- clause , a long phrase is inserted, and so, the sentence is wrong. in gmatprep, there is an official answer which prove my point.
so, there is no absolute rule of grammar here. if the clause modifying the noun is close to the noun, the sentence is correct. if the noun and the the modifying clause are far, the sentence is incorrect.