Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 18 Jul 2019, 23:05

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4273
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 06 Jan 2019, 10:16
4
22
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (02:15) correct 47% (02:25) wrong based on 521 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Which of the following best completes the passage below?

In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to raise water quality should be abolished. The law requires ranchers to install fences that prevent livestock from entering waterways. Although they acknowledge that, without fences in place, the waterways would become more polluted in the short term, the ranchers argue that in the long term the increased pollution would be accompanied by higher profit margins. Higher profit margins would lead to more ranching entrepreneurs entering the market, which would in turn mean more tax funding for a water treatment facility that purifies contaminated water. Therefore, eliminating the requirement that ranchers fence their land would ultimately lead to cleaner water supplies. This argument cannot be true unless .

(A) all ranchers are taxed at the same rate

(B) the fenced ranches are upstream from the proposed new water treatment facility

(C) pollution levels in the waterways under consideration are already high

(D) an increase in the number of ranches does not reduce the overall revenue from cattle ranching in Beefola County by creating a rise in the supply of beef that drives beef prices down

(E) Beefola County can guarantee that all tax revenue received from cattle ranchers will be used to pay for the water treatment facility

Day 10 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer
Please make sure to post a brief reply without revealing your solution to enter the contest!

_________________

Originally posted by souvik101990 on 20 Sep 2014, 11:21.
Last edited by Bunuel on 06 Jan 2019, 10:16, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4273
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Sep 2014, 11:11
Again,
Thanks for the overwhelming response. Apologize for the mix up. Here is the OE

Attachment:

CR.png [ 75.69 KiB | Viewed 1749 times ]

_________________
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1100
Location: India
Re: In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Nov 2015, 07:55
1
In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to raise water quality should be abolished.
But why.....here we go
The law requires ranchers to install fences that prevent livestock from entering waterways.
Although they acknowledge that, without fences in place, the waterways would become more polluted in the short term, the ranchers argue that in the long term the increased pollution would be accompanied by higher profit margins. Higher profit margins would lead to more ranching entrepreneurs entering the market, which would in turn mean more tax funding for a water treatment facility that purifies contaminated water. Therefore, eliminating the requirement that ranchers fence their land would ultimately lead to cleaner water supplies.

This argument cannot be true unless .

(A) all ranchers are taxed at the same rate..............whether or not the same rate does not affect the conclusion.
(B) the fenced ranches are upstream from the proposed new water treatment facility.........water is filtered by preventing livestock and upstream/downstream location need not be assumed.
(C) pollution levels in the waterways under consideration are already high............need not be assumed.
(D) an increase in the number of ranches does not reduce the overall revenue from cattle ranching in Beefola County by creating a rise in the supply of beef that drives beef prices down.........this is assumed since otherwise the conclusion of ranchers does not hold true.
(E) Beefola County can guarantee that all tax revenue received from cattle ranchers will be used to pay for the water treatment facility..........Beefola County stated the new law and seems to be in favor of it. ranchers are against the law as they believe that tax profit they get can get the water purifies. Whether or not county guarantees anything need not be assumed.

I got stuck between D and E. Eliminated D for the mentioned of beef supply and chose E.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4790
Re: In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jan 2019, 10:17
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra   [#permalink] 06 Jan 2019, 10:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In Beefola County, cattle ranchers argue that a new law designed to ra

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne