In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical sociology—the examination of history using the methods of sociology—historical sociologist Philip Abrams argues that, while people are made by society as much as society is made by people, sociologists’ approach to the subject is usually to focus on only one of these forms of influence to the exclusion of the other. Abrams insists on the necessity for sociologists to move beyond these one-sided approaches to understand society as an entity constructed by individuals who are at the same time constructed by their society. Abrams refers to this continuous process as “structuring”. Abrams also sees history as the result of structuring. People, both individually and as members of collectives, make history. But our making of history is itself formed and informed not only by the historical conditions we inherit from the past but also by the prior formation of our own identities and capacities, which are shaped by what Abrams calls “contingencies”—social phenomena over which we have varying degrees of control. Contingencies include such things as the social conditions under which we come of age, the condition of our household’s economy, the ideologies available to help us make sense of our situation, and accidental circumstances. The ways in which contingencies affect our individual or group identities create a structure of forces within which we are able to act, and that partially determines the sorts of actions we are able to perform. In Abrams analysis, historical structuring, like social structuring, is manifold and unremitting. To understand it, historical sociologists must extract from it certain significant episodes, or events, that their methodology can then analyze and interpret. According to Abrams, these events are points at which action and contingency meet, points that represent a cross-section of the specific social and individual forces in play at a given time. At such moments, individuals stand forth as agents of history not simply because they possess a unique ability to act, but also because in them we see the force of the specific social conditions that allowed their actions to come forth. Individuals can “make their mark” on history, yet in individuals, one also finds the convergence of wider social forces. In order to capture the various facets of this mutual interaction, Abrams recommends a fourfold structure to which he believes the investigations of historical sociologists should conform: first, description of the event itself; second, discussion of the social context that helped bring the event about and gave it significance; third, summary of the life history of the individual agent in the event; and fourth, analysis of the consequences of the event both for history and for the individual 1 1. Which one of the following most accurately states the central idea of the passage? (A) Abrams argues that historical sociology rejects the claims of sociologists who assert that the sociological concept of structuring cannot be applied to the interactions between individuals and history. (B) Abrams argues that historical sociology assumes that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, history influences the social contingencies that affect individuals. (C) Abrams argues that historical sociology demonstrates that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, social structures both influence and are influenced by the events of history. (D) Abrams describes historical sociology as a discipline that unites two approaches taken by sociologists to studying the formation of societies and applies the resulting combined approach to the study of history. (E) Abrams describes historical sociology as an attempt to compensate for the shortcoming of traditional historical methods by applying the methods established in sociology. 2 2. Given the passage’s argument, which one of the following sentences most logically completes the last paragraph? (A) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, can historical sociologists conclude with any certainty that the events that constitute the historical record are influenced by the actions of individuals (B) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, will historical sociologists be able to counter the standard sociological assumption that there is very little connection between history and individual agency. (C) Unless they can agree to adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists risk having their discipline treated as little more than an interesting but ultimately indefensible adjunct to history and sociology. (D) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists can shed light on issues that traditional sociologists have chosen to ignore in their one-sided approaches to the formation of societies. (E) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists will be able to better portray the complex connections between human agency and history. 3 3. The passage states that a contingency could be each of the following EXCEPT: (A) a social phenomenon (B) a form of historical structuring (C) an accidental circumstance (D) a condition controllable to some extent by an individual (E) a partial determinant of an individual’s actions 4 4. Which one of the following is most analogous to the ideal work of a historical sociologist as outlined by Abrams? (A) In a report on the enactment of a bill into law, a journalist explains why the need for the bill arose, sketches the biography of the principal legislator who wrote the bill, and ponders the effect that the bill’s enactment will have both one society and on the legislator’s career. (B) In consultation with a patient, a doctor reviews the patient’s medical history, suggests possible reasons for the patient’s current condition, and recommends steps that the patient should take in the future to ensure that the condition improves or at least does not get any worse. (C) In an analysis of a historical novel, a critic provides information to support the claim that details of the work’s setting are accurate, explains why the subject of the novel was of particular interest to the author, and compares the novel with some of the author’s other books set in the same period. (D) In a presentation to stockholders, a corporation’s chief executive officer describes the corporations’ most profitable activities during the past year, introduces the vice president largely responsible for those activities, and discusses new projects the vice president will initiate in the coming year. (E) In developing a film based on a historical event, a filmmaker conducts interviews with participants in the event, bases part of the film’s screenplay on the interviews, and concludes the screenplay with a sequence of scenes speculating on the outcome of the event had certain details been different. 5 5. The primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to (A) outline the merits of Abram’s conception of historical sociology (B) convey the details of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology (C) anticipate challenges to Abrams’s conception of historical sociology (D) examine the roles of key terms used in Abrams’s conception of historical sociology (E) identify the basis of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology 6 6. Based on the passage, which one of the following is the LEAST illustrative example of the effect of a contingency upon an individual? (A) the effect of the fact that a person experienced political injustice on that person’s decision to work for political reform (B) the effect of the fact that a person was raised in an agricultural region on that person’s decision to pursue a career in agriculture (C) the effect of the fact that a person lives in a particular community on that person’s decision to visit friends in another community (D) the effect of the fact that a person’s parents practiced a particular religion on that person’s decision to practice that religion (E) the effect of the fact that a person grew up in financial hardship on that person’s decision to help others in financial hardship Source: LSAT Official PrepTest 38 ( October 2002 ) Difficulty Level: 650

Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 20:34

It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 20:34

Toolkit

Reading Comprehension (RC)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Nov 20
UCR MBA Impact - Live Q&A with UCR AdCom & Student
07:30 AM PST
-
08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 22
GMAT RC Masterclass
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Nov 23
Conquer Algebra on the GMAT Focus Edition
11:00 AM IST
-
01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease.
Nov 25
Try OnDemand GMAT Masterclass
10:00 AM EST
-
11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical

1 2

prragya

Joined: 14 Dec 2024

Last visit: 24 Sep 2025

Posts: 3

Given Kudos: 9

Products:

Posts: 3

Kudos: 0

18 Aug 2025, 16:39

Kudos

Bookmarks

GMATNinja can you please help me understand why D is incorrect for Q2

kitkat4620

Joined: 22 Jan 2024

Last visit: 18 Nov 2025

Posts: 4

Given Kudos: 50

Products:

Posts: 4

Kudos: 0

19 Aug 2025, 13:04

Kudos

Bookmarks

took my 12 mins and got all but one correct
did not quite understand the 2nd one but then read the complete sentence and understood.

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 19 Nov 2025

Posts: 7,443

Own Kudos:

69,787

[1]

Given Kudos: 2,060

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,443

Kudos: 69,787

[1]

02 Sep 2025, 14:19

Kudos

Bookmarks

prragya

can you please help me understand why D is incorrect for Q2

This passage is an excellent example of why everyone hates academic writing. 😬

If you strip away all the dense jargon and convoluted prose, the idea is a very simple one: this guy Abrams is called a "historical sociologist," which is just a fancy way of saying he studies the ways that humans make society, and the ways that society, in turn, shapes human behavior. Makes sense!

He then takes this idea and applies it to history: human behavior shapes history, which, in turn, shapes human behavior. Also makes sense!

So what comes next? Maybe some kind of some kind of wishy-washy conclusion about how Abrams's thinking will help us better understand history? That's more or less what (E) gives us.

I can see why you were tempted by (D). In the first paragraph, after all, we're told that other sociologists have a "one-sided" view of things.

But once we move from sociology (in paragraph one) to history (in the remainder of the passage), we're no longer focusing on anyone else's shortcomings. It's more about understanding why Abrams's line of thinking is useful. Put another way: by paragraph three, the passage's tone is way more "Abrams = good" then "Abrams's competitors = bad," and the next line should reflect that trajectory.

I hope that clears things up!

1 2

Moderators:

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

7443 posts

GMATNinjaTwo

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

231 posts

Sajjad1994

GRE Forum Moderator

17304 posts

miag