Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 15 Jul 2019, 23:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 751
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2018, 03:27
1
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 63 sessions

47% (03:20) correct 53% (03:41) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 74 sessions

44% (01:48) correct 56% (01:38) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 74 sessions

63% (01:24) correct 37% (01:12) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 65 sessions

63% (02:05) correct 38% (01:55) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 64 sessions

71% (01:01) correct 29% (00:45) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 60 sessions

68% (01:38) correct 32% (01:42) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical sociology—the examination of history using the methods of sociology—historical sociologist Philip Abrams argues that, while people are made by society as much as society is made by people, sociologists’ approach to the subject is usually to focus on only one of these forms of influence to the exclusion of the other. Abrams insists on the necessity for sociologists to move beyond these one-sided approaches to understand society as an entity constructed by individuals who are at the same time constructed by their society. Abrams refers to this continuous process as “structuring”.

Abrams also sees history as the result of structuring. People, both individually and as members of collectives, make history. But our making of history is itself formed and informed not only by the historical conditions we inherit from the past but also by the prior formation of our own identities and capacities, which are shaped by what Abrams calls “contingencies”—social phenomena over which we have varying degrees of control. Contingencies include such things as the social conditions under which we come of age, the condition of our household’s economy, the ideologies available to help us make sense of our situation, and accidental circumstances. The ways in which contingencies affect our individual or group identities create a structure of forces within which we are able to act, and that partially determines the sorts of actions we are able to perform.

In Abrams analysis, historical structuring, like social structuring, is manifold and unremitting. To understand it, historical sociologists must extract from it certain significant episodes, or events, that their methodology can then analyze and interpret. According to Abrams, these events are points at which action and contingency meet, points that represent a cross-section of the specific social and individual forces in play at a given time. At such moments, individuals stand forth as agents of history not simply because they possess a unique ability to act, but also because in them we see the force of the specific social conditions that allowed their actions to come forth. Individuals can “make their mark” on history, yet in individuals, one also finds the convergence of wider social forces. In order to capture the various facets of this mutual interaction, Abrams recommends a fourfold structure to which he believes the investigations of historical sociologists should conform: first, description of the event itself; second, discussion of the social context that helped bring the event about and gave it significance; third, summary of the life history of the individual agent in the event; and fourth, analysis of the consequences of the event both for history and for the individual
1. Which one of the following most accurately states the central idea of the passage?

(A) Abrams argues that historical sociology rejects the claims of sociologists who assert that the sociological concept of structuring cannot be applied to the interactions between individuals and history.
(B) Abrams argues that historical sociology assumes that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, history influences the social contingencies that affect individuals.
(C) Abrams argues that historical sociology demonstrates that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, social structures both influence and are influenced by the events of history.
(D) Abrams describes historical sociology as a discipline that unites two approaches taken by sociologists to studying the formation of societies and applies the resulting combined approach to the study of history.
(E) Abrams describes historical society as an attempt to compensate for the shortcoming of traditional historical methods by applying the methods established in sociology.



2. Given the passage’s argument, which one of the following sentences most logically completes the last paragraph?

(A) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, can historical sociologists conclude with any certainty that the events that constitute the historical record are influenced by the actions of individuals
(B) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, will historical sociologists be able to counter the standard sociological assumption that there is very little connection between history and individual agency.
(C) Unless they can agree to adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists risk having their discipline treated as little more than an interesting but ultimately indefensible adjunct to history and sociology.
(D) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists can shed light on issues that traditional sociologists have chosen to ignore in their one-sided approaches to the formation of societies.
(E) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists will be able to better portray the complex connections between human agency and history.



3. The passage states that a contingency could be each of the following EXCEPT:

(A) a social phenomenon
(B) a form of historical structuring
(C) an accidental circumstance
(D) a condition controllable to some extent by an individual
(E) a partial determinant of an individual’s actions



4. Which one of the following is most analogous to the ideal work of a historical sociologist as outlined by Abrams?

(A) In a report on the enactment of a bill into law, a journalist explains why the need for the bill arose, sketches the biography of the principal legislator who wrote the bill, and ponders the effect that the bill’s enactment will have both one society and on the legislator’s career.
(B) In consultation with a patient, a doctor reviews the patient’s medical history, suggests possible reasons for the patient’s current condition, and recommends steps that the patient should take in the future to ensure that the condition improves or at least does not get any worse.
(C) In an analysis of a historical novel, a critic provides information to support the claim that details of the work’s setting are accurate, explains why the subject of the novel was of particular interest to the author, and compares the novel with some of the author’s other books set in the same period.
(D) In a presentation to stockholders, a corporation’s chief executive officer describes the corporations’ most profitable activities during the past year, introduces the vice president largely responsible for those activities, and discusses new projects the vice president will initiate in the coming year.
(E) In developing a film based on a historical event, a filmmaker conducts interviews with participants in the event, bases part of the film’s screenplay on the interviews, and concludes the screenplay with a sequence of scenes speculating on the outcome of the event had certain details been different.



5. The primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to

(A) outline the merits of Abram’s conception of historical sociology
(B) convey the details of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology
(C) anticipate challenges to Abrams’s conception of historical sociology
(D) examine the roles of key terms used in Abrams’s conception of historical sociology
(E) identify the basis of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology



6. Based on the passage, which one of the following is the LEAST illustrative example of the effect of a contingency upon an individual?

(A) the effect of the fact that a person experienced political injustice on that person’s decision to work for political reform
(B) the effect of the fact that a person was raised in an agricultural region on that person’s decision to pursue a career in agriculture
(C) the effect of the fact that a person lives in a particular community on that person’s decision to visit friends in another community
(D) the effect of the fact that a person’s parents practiced a particular religion on that person’s decision to practice that religion
(E) the effect of the fact that a person grew up in financial hardship on that person’s decision to help others in financial hardship



_________________
Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Affiliations: GMATClub
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 2554
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2018, 22:32

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions


_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Nov 2018
Posts: 110
CAT Tests
In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 09:39
2 wrong (Question 1 & Question 4)
Total time - 17.6mins
Reading-5:50

Can anyone explain question 4?
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 249
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 16:28
1
Gladiator59 wrote:
In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical sociology—the examination of history using the methods of sociology—historical sociologist Philip Abrams argues that, while people are made by society as much as society is made by people, sociologists’ approach to the subject is usually to focus on only one of these forms of influence to the exclusion of the other. Abrams insists on the necessity for sociologists to move beyond these one-sided approaches to understand society as an entity constructed by individuals who are at the same time constructed by their society. Abrams refers to this continuous process as “structuring”.

Abrams also sees history as the result of structuring. People, both individually and as members of collectives, make history. But our making of history is itself formed and informed not only by the historical conditions we inherit from the past but also by the prior formation of our own identities and capacities, which are shaped by what Abrams calls “contingencies”—social phenomena over which we have varying degrees of control. Contingencies include such things as the social conditions under which we come of age, the condition of our household’s economy, the ideologies available to help us make sense of our situation, and accidental circumstances. The ways in which contingencies affect our individual or group identities create a structure of forces within which we are able to act, and that partially determines the sorts of actions we are able to perform.

In Abrams analysis, historical structuring, like social structuring, is manifold and unremitting. To understand it, historical sociologists must extract from it certain significant episodes, or events, that their methodology can then analyze and interpret. According to Abrams, these events are points at which action and contingency meet, points that represent a cross-section of the specific social and individual forces in play at a given time. At such moments, individuals stand forth as agents of history not simply because they possess a unique ability to act, but also because in them we see the force of the specific social conditions that allowed their actions to come forth. Individuals can “make their mark” on history, yet in individuals, one also finds the convergence of wider social forces. In order to capture the various facets of this mutual interaction, Abrams recommends a fourfold structure to which he believes the investigations of historical sociologists should conform: first, description of the event itself; second, discussion of the social context that helped bring the event about and gave it significance; third, summary of the life history of the individual agent in the event; and fourth, analysis of the consequences of the event both for history and for the individual
1. Which one of the following most accurately states the central idea of the passage?

(A) Abrams argues that historical sociology rejects the claims of sociologists who assert that the sociological concept of structuring cannot be applied to the interactions between individuals and history.
(B) Abrams argues that historical sociology assumes that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, history influences the social contingencies that affect individuals.
(C) Abrams argues that historical sociology demonstrates that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, social structures both influence and are influenced by the events of history.
(D) Abrams describes historical sociology as a discipline that unites two approaches taken by sociologists to studying the formation of societies and applies the resulting combined approach to the study of history.
(E) Abrams describes historical society as an attempt to compensate for the shortcoming of traditional historical methods by applying the methods established in sociology.



2. Given the passage’s argument, which one of the following sentences most logically completes the last paragraph?

(A) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, can historical sociologists conclude with any certainty that the events that constitute the historical record are influenced by the actions of individuals
(B) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, will historical sociologists be able to counter the standard sociological assumption that there is very little connection between history and individual agency.
(C) Unless they can agree to adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists risk having their discipline treated as little more than an interesting but ultimately indefensible adjunct to history and sociology.
(D) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists can shed light on issues that traditional sociologists have chosen to ignore in their one-sided approaches to the formation of societies.
(E) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists will be able to better portray the complex connections between human agency and history.



3. The passage states that a contingency could be each of the following EXCEPT:

(A) a social phenomenon
(B) a form of historical structuring
(C) an accidental circumstance
(D) a condition controllable to some extent by an individual
(E) a partial determinant of an individual’s actions



4. Which one of the following is most analogous to the ideal work of a historical sociologist as outlined by Abrams?

(A) In a report on the enactment of a bill into law, a journalist explains why the need for the bill arose, sketches the biography of the principal legislator who wrote the bill, and ponders the effect that the bill’s enactment will have both one society and on the legislator’s career.
(B) In consultation with a patient, a doctor reviews the patient’s medical history, suggests possible reasons for the patient’s current condition, and recommends steps that the patient should take in the future to ensure that the condition improves or at least does not get any worse.
(C) In an analysis of a historical novel, a critic provides information to support the claim that details of the work’s setting are accurate, explains why the subject of the novel was of particular interest to the author, and compares the novel with some of the author’s other books set in the same period.
(D) In a presentation to stockholders, a corporation’s chief executive officer describes the corporations’ most profitable activities during the past year, introduces the vice president largely responsible for those activities, and discusses new projects the vice president will initiate in the coming year.
(E) In developing a film based on a historical event, a filmmaker conducts interviews with participants in the event, bases part of the film’s screenplay on the interviews, and concludes the screenplay with a sequence of scenes speculating on the outcome of the event had certain details been different.



5. The primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to

(A) outline the merits of Abram’s conception of historical sociology
(B) convey the details of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology
(C) anticipate challenges to Abrams’s conception of historical sociology
(D) examine the roles of key terms used in Abrams’s conception of historical sociology
(E) identify the basis of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology



6. Based on the passage, which one of the following is the LEAST illustrative example of the effect of a contingency upon an individual?

(A) the effect of the fact that a person experienced political injustice on that person’s decision to work for political reform
(B) the effect of the fact that a person was raised in an agricultural region on that person’s decision to pursue a career in agriculture
(C) the effect of the fact that a person lives in a particular community on that person’s decision to visit friends in another community
(D) the effect of the fact that a person’s parents practiced a particular religion on that person’s decision to practice that religion
(E) the effect of the fact that a person grew up in financial hardship on that person’s decision to help others in financial hardship



all correct, but took me 12:19 to read and answer 6 questions... Questions weren't difficult but that was one boring passage...

Anyways here's my thought process if it helps anyone:

1) Everything you need to answer this question is in paragraph 1. The first line "the foundations of discipline of historical sociology" tells us we're about to learn more about a discipline. Towards the middle of the paragraph, the author says that "sociologists’ approach to the subject is usually to focus on only one of these forms". Thus the answer is D. Abram's wants to combine the two approaches taken by sociologists in his discipline.

2) Towards the last sentence we have this line: "In order to capture the various facets of this mutual interaction, Abrams recommends a fourfold structure to which he believes the investigations of historical sociologists should conform". The only logical answer to follow this would be "because X (above), historical sociologists will be able to better portray the complex connections between human agency and history."

3) No where in the paragraph does the author say contingency is a form of historical structuring. contingency is a condition that influences an individuals life in some degree.

4) A historical sociologist MUST take into account the WHOLE picture. This includes not just the subject at hand, but also the entire landscape (whats happening surrounding the subject, and what the impacts are). Only A considers all of these factors.

5) I was in between B and E here and chose E because in the first paragraph we are explaining what led to Abram's form of historical sociology. Hence the author is giving us the BASIS for his theories.

6) C because to me that was the least extreme case out of all the others.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2018
Posts: 1
Location: United States
GPA: 3.3
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 16:36
1
2 wrong (3 and 5) 7.5 minutes including passage. prototypevenom - For Q4 - "A" is the answer as it explains how the journalist not just explains the bill details but also outlines the people and the conditions during the development of the bill.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 24 Nov 2018
Posts: 109
Location: India
GPA: 3.27
WE: General Management (Retail Banking)
Premium Member
In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 20:12
In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical sociology—the examination of history using the methods of sociology—historical sociologist Philip Abrams argues that, while people are made by society as much as society is made by people, sociologists’ approach to the subject is usually to focus on only one of these forms of influence to the exclusion of the other. Abrams insists on the necessity for sociologists to move beyond these one-sided approaches to understand society as an entity constructed by individuals who are at the same time constructed by their society. Abrams refers to this continuous process as “structuring”.

Abrams also sees history as the result of structuring. People, both individually and as members of collectives, make history. But our making of history is itself formed and informed not only by the historical conditions we inherit from the past but also by the prior formation of our own identities and capacities, which are shaped by what Abrams calls “contingencies”—social phenomena over which we have varying degrees of control. Contingencies include such things as the social conditions under which we come of age, the condition of our household’s economy, the ideologies available to help us make sense of our situation, and accidental circumstances. The ways in which contingencies affect our individual or group identities create a structure of forces within which we are able to act, and that partially determines the sorts of actions we are able to perform.

In Abrams analysis, historical structuring, like social structuring, is manifold and unremitting. To understand it, historical sociologists must extract from it certain significant episodes, or events, that their methodology can then analyze and interpret. According to Abrams, these events are points at which action and contingency meet, points that represent a cross-section of the specific social and individual forces in play at a given time. At such moments, individuals stand forth as agents of history not simply because they possess a unique ability to act, but also because in them we see the force of the specific social conditions that allowed their actions to come forth. Individuals can “make their mark” on history, yet in individuals, one also finds the convergence of wider social forces. In order to capture the various facets of this mutual interaction, Abrams recommends a fourfold structure to which he believes the investigations of historical sociologists should conform: first, description of the event itself; second, discussion of the social context that helped bring the event about and gave it significance; third, summary of the life history of the individual agent in the event; and fourth, analysis of the consequences of the event both for history and for the individual
1. Which one of the following most accurately states the central idea of the passage?

(A) Abrams argues that historical sociology rejects the claims of sociologists who assert that the sociological concept of structuring cannot be applied to the interactions between individuals and history.
(B) Abrams argues that historical sociology assumes that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, history influences the social contingencies that affect individuals.
(C) Abrams argues that historical sociology demonstrates that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, social structures both influence and are influenced by the events of history.--Correct. See the paragraph in red.
(D) Abrams describes historical sociology as a discipline that unites two approaches taken by sociologists to studying the formation of societies and applies the resulting combined approach to the study of history.
(E) Abrams describes historical society as an attempt to compensate for the shortcoming of traditional historical methods by applying the methods established in sociology.



2. Given the passage’s argument, which one of the following sentences most logically completes the last paragraph?

(A) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, can historical sociologists conclude with any certainty that the events that constitute the historical record are influenced by the actions of individuals
(B) Only if they adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, will historical sociologists be able to counter the standard sociological assumption that there is very little connection between history and individual agency.
(C) Unless they can agree to adhere to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists risk having their discipline treated as little more than an interesting but ultimately indefensible adjunct to history and sociology.
(D) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists can shed light on issues that traditional sociologists have chosen to ignore in their one-sided approaches to the formation of societies.
(E) By adhering to this structure, Abrams believes, historical sociologists will be able to better portray the complex connections between human agency and history.--Correct. See the part highlighted in green.



3. The passage states that a contingency could be each of the following EXCEPT:

(A) a social phenomenon
(B) a form of historical structuring--- Correct. It is identities and capacities which contingency impacts, not the social structuring. See blue highlighted part
(C) an accidental circumstance
(D) a condition controllable to some extent by an individual
(E) a partial determinant of an individual’s actions



4. Which one of the following is most analogous to the ideal work of a historical sociologist as outlined by Abrams?

(A) In a report on the enactment of a bill into law, a journalist explains why the need for the bill arose, sketches the biography of the principal legislator who wrote the bill, and ponders the effect that the bill’s enactment will have both one society and on the legislator’s career.--Correct. See Brown highlighted part.
(B) In consultation with a patient, a doctor reviews the patient’s medical history, suggests possible reasons for the patient’s current condition, and recommends steps that the patient should take in the future to ensure that the condition improves or at least does not get any worse.
(C) In an analysis of a historical novel, a critic provides information to support the claim that details of the work’s setting are accurate, explains why the subject of the novel was of particular interest to the author, and compares the novel with some of the author’s other books set in the same period.
(D) In a presentation to stockholders, a corporation’s chief executive officer describes the corporations’ most profitable activities during the past year, introduces the vice president largely responsible for those activities, and discusses new projects the vice president will initiate in the coming year.
(E) In developing a film based on a historical event, a filmmaker conducts interviews with participants in the event, bases part of the film’s screenplay on the interviews, and concludes the screenplay with a sequence of scenes speculating on the outcome of the event had certain details been different.



5. The primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to

(A) outline the merits of Abram’s conception of historical sociology--Not mentioned
(B) convey the details of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology-- Mentioned in second and third paragraphs.
(C) anticipate challenges to Abrams’s conception of historical sociology-- Not mentioned.
(D) examine the roles of key terms used in Abrams’s conception of historical sociology--- Mentioned in the second paragraph.
(E) identify the basis of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology--- Correct. Mentioned in the first paragraph.



6. Based on the passage, which one of the following is the LEAST illustrative example of the effect of a contingency upon an individual?

(A) the effect of the fact that a person experienced political injustice on that person’s decision to work for political reform.
(B) the effect of the fact that a person was raised in an agricultural region on that person’s decision to pursue a career in agriculture
(C) the effect of the fact that a person lives in a particular community on that person’s decision to visit friends in another community-- Correct. This is the only case where definition of contingency doesn't hold. The rest are contingencies on which the person had influence to varying degrees.
(D) the effect of the fact that a person’s parents practiced a particular religion on that person’s decision to practice that religion
(E) the effect of the fact that a person grew up in financial hardship on that person’s decision to help others in financial hardship



My explanation is inside both the boxes highlighted with different colors. Please refer to it. Thanks.
_________________
Kudos encourage discussions. Share it to amplify collective education!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 234
Concentration: Finance, Economics
WE: Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2018, 21:40
Gladiator59 5 correct in 14 minutes. How did you fare ? Could you please provide OE for the first one.


Regards
_________________
Even if it takes me 30 attempts, I am determined enough to score 740+ in my 31st attempt. This is it, this is what I have been waiting for, now is the time to get up and fight, for my life is 100% my responsibility.

Dil ye Ziddi hai !!!
Senior PS Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: It always seems impossible until it's done.
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Posts: 751
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Dec 2018, 01:20
I managed to get five out of six on this one. I do not have the OEs but will take an attempt to pen my thoughts on Q1 which I had correctly answered.

Summary/central idea is very important to answer such questions. You need to understand that Abrams suggests that history and individuals are writing each other. Actions of individuals depend on "contingencies" and that we need to study this with the correct perspectives. He also suggests a four-fold method (too detailed to list but need to know he does so) at the end of the passage

1. Which one of the following most accurately states the central idea of the passage?

(A) Abrams argues that historical sociology rejects the claims of sociologists who assert that the sociological concept of structuring cannot be applied to the interactions between individuals and history. Even though this is true, it is too detailed to be the central idea of the passage
(B) Abrams argues that historical sociology assumes that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, history influences the social contingencies that affect individuals. Argues is wrong usage ( which was also present in first option) as Abrams just presents the views but does not create an argument as such
(C) Abrams argues that historical sociology demonstrates that, despite the views of sociologists to the contrary, social structures both influence and are influenced by the events of history. Reject for same reason as above - Abrams is describing the views that are the basis of Historical sociology
(D) Abrams describes historical sociology as a discipline that unites two approaches taken by sociologists to studying the formation of societies and applies the resulting combined approach to the study of history. Bingo - the first para is a description of what HS is and the foru-fold method at the end is Abrams application of the definition to point a way forward
(E) Abrams describes historical society as an attempt to compensate for the shortcoming of traditional historical methods by applying the methods established in sociology. Historical society - BS Option.Discard


Best,
Gladi

ShankSouljaBoi wrote:
Gladiator59 5 correct in 14 minutes. How did you fare ? Could you please provide OE for the first one.


Regards

_________________
Regards,
Gladi



“Do. Or do not. There is no try.” - Yoda (The Empire Strikes Back)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
D
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 481
GMAT 1: 670 Q46 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2019, 11:32
Lengthy passage with details!

Passage map:


1) Structuring
2) History as the result of structuring. Contingencies.
3) Historical structuring needs to extract certain significant episodes, or events to learn from them.
_________________
Most Comprehensive Article on How to Score a 700+ on the GMAT (NEW)
Verb Tenses Simplified


If you found my post useful, KUDOS are much appreciated. Giving Kudos is a great way to thank and motivate contributors, without costing you anything.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Posts: 13
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2019, 13:22
14.5 min including reading.
4/6

How is B incorrect and E correct for Q5?

Thanks

Posted from my mobile device
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3421
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Feb 2019, 14:33
Top Contributor
Quote:
In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical sociology
.................................
Quote:
Abrams refers to this continuous process as “structuring”.



E is the best answer

(B) convey the details of Abrams’s conception of historical sociology

No details are mentioned but only a general concept to overcome an old dichotomy

Hope this helps.

Regards
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical   [#permalink] 09 Feb 2019, 14:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In explaining the foundations of the discipline known as historical

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne