Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 07:17 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 07:17

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 2804 [162]
Given Kudos: 20
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 336
Own Kudos [?]: 1821 [24]
Given Kudos: 11
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2015
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [6]
Given Kudos: 54
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
1
Kudos
12. C
It introduces the event Lone Wolf and then goes on illustrating the far more impact of that event.

13. D
line 20 to 35 state that Federal govt was involved in Treaties with Indians.

14. E
Passage presents a view that the event was propely emphasized by Clark 'but he fails to note
the decision’s more far-reaching'

15. C
Line 15-20
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
1
Kudos
According to the passage, the congressional action of 1871 had which of the following effects?

(A) Native American tribal agreements were treated as legislation that had to be passed by both houses of Congress.
(B) The number of formal agreements negotiated between the federal government and Native American tribes decreased.
(C) The procedures for congressional approval and implementation of federal Indian policy were made more precise.
(D) It became more difficult for Congress to exercise unilateral authority over Native American affairs.
(E) The role of Congress in the ratification of treaties with sovereign nations was eventually undermined.

OA : A .

thx guys. but i really dnt understand this one. I chose a B. got it all wrong!
:-(

P
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Q12: C
(front)…In his study of the Lone Wolf case…he fails to note the decision’s more far-reaching impact ….(end) The Lone Wolf decision ended this era of formal negotiation

Q13: D
(mid)…1871 when— following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs—Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes.

Q14: B (looks like I got this wrong according to others. I was between B or D - appreciate if you can explain! My thinking was that the weight of the Blue Clark example was on its failure to recognize the more far-reaching impact. Commentators believed otherwise, but in fact LW ended the era. It doesn't seem as it is brought up strictly to refute the commentators, rather the author is drawing an example to support his/her view.)

…he fails to note the decision’s more far-reaching impact… Many commentators believe… But in reality the federal government continued to negotiate… (“In fact”) The Lone Wolf decision ended this era of formal negotiation and finally did away

Q15: C
(mid)…the federal government totally abandoned negotiation and execution of formal written agreements with Indian tribes as a prerequisite for the implementation of federal Indian policy.….(end)The Lone Wolf decision ended this era of formal negotiation
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2011
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.61
WE:Consulting (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
2
Kudos
rohitgoel15 wrote:
In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United States Supreme Court rejected the
Line efforts of three Native American tribes
(5) to prevent the opening of tribal lands
to non-Indian settlement without tribal
consent. In his study of the Lone
Wolf case, Blue Clark properly
emphasizes the Court’s assertion
(10) of a virtually unlimited unilateral power
of Congress (the House of Represen-
tatives and the Senate) over Native
American affairs. But he fails to note
the decision’s more far-reaching
(15) impact: shortly after Lone Wolf, the
federal government totally abandoned
negotiation and execution of formal
written agreements with Indian tribes
as a prerequisite for the implemen-
(20) tation of federal Indian policy. Many
commentators believe that this change
had already occurred in 1871 when—
following a dispute between the
House and the Senate over which
(25) chamber should enjoy primacy in
Indian affairs—Congress abolished
the making of treaties with Native
American tribes. But in reality the
federal government continued to nego-
(30) tiate formal tribal agreements past
the turn of the century, treating these
documents not as treaties with sover-
eign nations requiring ratification by the
Senate but simply as legislation to be
(35) passed by both houses of Congress.
The Lone Wolf decision ended this
era of formal negotiation and finally
did away with what had increasingly
become the empty formality of obtain-
ing tribal consent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q12:
The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

A. identifying similarities in two different theories
B. evaluating a work of scholarship
C. analyzing the significance of a historical event
D. debunking a revisionist interpretation
E. exploring the relationship between law and social reality

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q13:
According to the passage, which of the following was true of relations between the federal government and Native American tribes?

A. Some Native American tribes approved of the congressional action of 1871 because it simplified their dealings with the federal government.
B. Some Native American tribes were more eager to negotiate treaties with the United States after the Lone Wolf decision.
C. Prior to the Lone Wolf decision, the Supreme Court was reluctant to hear cases involving agreements negotiated between Congress and Native American tribes.
D. Prior to 1871, the federal government sometimes negotiated treaties with Native American tribes.
E. Following 1871, the House exercised more power than did the Senate in the government’s dealings with Native American tribes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q14:
As an element in the argument presented by the author of the passage, the reference to Blue Clark’s study of the Lone Wolf case serves primarily to

A. point out that this episode in Native American history has received inadequate attention from scholars
B. support the contention of the author of the passage that the Lone Wolf decision had a greater long-term impact than did the congressional action of 1871
C. challenge the validity of the Supreme Court’s decision confirming the unlimited unilateral power of Congress in Native American affairs
D. refute the argument of commentators who regard the congressional action of 1871 as the end of the era of formal negotiation between the federal government and Native American tribes
E. introduce a view about the Lone Wolf decision that the author will expand upon

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q15:
According to the passage, which of the following resulted from the Lone Wolf decision?

A. The Supreme Court took on a greater role in Native American affairs.
B. Native American tribes lost their legal standing as sovereign nations in their dealings with the federal government, but their ownership of tribal lands was confirmed.
C. The federal government no longer needed to conclude a formal agreement with a Native American tribe in order to carry out policy decisions that affected the tribe.
D. The federal government began to appropriate tribal lands for distribution to non-Indian settlers.
E. Native American tribes were no longer able to challenge congressional actions by appealing to the Supreme Court.



C
D
E
C

Hi BB,

Can someone explain about the relationships between Supreme court/Federal government/Congress etc...
I have seen so many passages related to them. I think understanding of this structure by, say US citizens or those who are aware of it, makes it a lot easier for them to understand the passage from the go.

Can you direct me to some link where I ca get more information about this.

KR,
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Hi - Try wikipedia :-)

In all seriousness though, you do not need to know anything about the US system for this to make sense.

You can of course learn about it, it will not hurt, but if I had limited time to revise - I'd concentrate on the core GMAT skills...

James
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 219
Own Kudos [?]: 1215 [0]
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
Can somebody explain me the details of this passage in simple language?

I struggled to understand the sentence below.

"In his study of the Lone
Wolf case, Blue Clark properly
emphasizes the Court’s assertion
(10) of a virtually unlimited unilateral power
of Congress (the House of Represen-
tatives and the Senate) over Native
American affairs. "

Does this mean that Clark is pointing that the Congress (Senate and HOR) has used its law-making power unjustly against the tribes??
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 343
Own Kudos [?]: 4586 [1]
Given Kudos: 606
Concentration: Technology, Other
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Time Taken 8 mins. All Correct.

Q2:

According to the passage, which of the following was true of relations between the federal government and Native American tribes?
D. Prior to 1871, the federal government sometimes negotiated treaties with Native American tribes.
E. Following 1871, the House exercised more power than did the Senate in the government’s dealings with Native American tribes.

>>Though arg support both , I selected D over E because E is more strong. any thoughts?

Many commentators believe that this change had already occurred in 1871 when following a dispute between the House and the Senate over which chamber should enjoy primacy in Indian affairs—Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes.
But in reality the federal government continued to negotiate formal tribal agreements past the turn of the century, treating these documents not as treaties with sovereign nations requiring ratification by the Senate but simply as legislation to be passed by both houses of Congress.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [2]
Given Kudos: 147
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
Hi experts, and mikemcgarry
would you please guide how should I distinguish B and C for main idea question. following is the detail of the main idea question
"The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

A. identifying similarities in two different theories
B. evaluating a work of scholarship
C. analyzing the significance of a historical event
D. debunking a revisionist interpretation
E. exploring the relationship between law and social reality"

I picked up B , but correct answer is C.

recently, I found I failed on most main idea questions,
in this case, I am surprised when read the OA, because I picked up wrong answer, B, while correct one is C
and then I spent much time to compare B and C, unfortunately, I have not got the idea,
regarding the future practices and tests, I have no idea how should I avoid the pick up wrong answers while I feel I would pick up the "right" but actual "wrong" answer.

Please ~~~~


have a nice day
>_~
ZOE
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 128
Own Kudos [?]: 713 [0]
Given Kudos: 138
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
zoezhuyan wrote:
Hi experts, and mikemcgarry
would you please guide how should I distinguish B and C for main idea question. following is the detail of the main idea question
"The author of the passage is primarily concerned with

B. evaluating a work of scholarship
C. analyzing the significance of a historical event"

ZOE


Hi Zoe,

I am neither Mike nor expert but I can say from Manhattan Reading Comprehension great explanation that the purpose of the passage comes from the point of the author, which is analogous to the "conclusion" in critical reasoning, but in a passage.

It worth reading the manhattan reading comprehension guide to understand how to locate the author's point that can be located anywhere in the text.

Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [0]
Given Kudos: 147
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
felippemed wrote:
Hi Zoe,

I am neither Mike nor expert but I can say from Manhattan Reading Comprehension great explanation that the purpose of the passage comes from the point of the author, which is analogous to the "conclusion" in critical reasoning, but in a passage.

It worth reading the manhattan reading comprehension guide to understand how to locate the author's point that can be located anywhere in the text.

Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device


thanks so much for your share.

my test is close, I am not sure whether I can add the whole guide on my list.
but I will follow your proposal after this time test. I believe I will do better next test.

have a nice day
>_~

Zoe
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 128
Own Kudos [?]: 713 [1]
Given Kudos: 138
Location: Brazil
GMAT 1: 470 Q30 V20
GMAT 2: 620 Q42 V33
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [0]
Given Kudos: 147
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
felippemed wrote:
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog/2011/07/22/how-to-find-the-point-in-an-rc-passage/

zoezhuyan

Hope it helps you b4 the test

thank you so much indeed, felippemed

I read it, very helpful...

lucky , I practiced OG12 RC many times, and the examples mention in the article are familiar with me. I can recall immediately,

I think I need more practice as the pointers in the articles.

thank you again.

happy new year.

>_~
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 823 [0]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
Nightmare007 wrote:
saintlychik wrote:
According to the passage, the congressional action of 1871 had which of the following effects?

(A) Native American tribal agreements were treated as legislation that had to be passed by both houses of Congress.
(B) The number of formal agreements negotiated between the federal government and Native American tribes decreased.
(C) The procedures for congressional approval and implementation of federal Indian policy were made more precise.
(D) It became more difficult for Congress to exercise unilateral authority over Native American affairs.
(E) The role of Congress in the ratification of treaties with sovereign nations was eventually undermined.

OA : A .

thx guys. but i really dnt understand this one. I chose a B. got it all wrong!
:-(

P

Hi in the last paragraph last 2-3 sentences you will see that just bill passing is done with both the houses . I hope you liked the answer . If so Hit kudos :)


Hi,
I am facing difficulty with this question. Isn't the question asking what happened after the dispute of 1871 and, thus after 'Congress abolished the making of treaties with Native American tribes' ?
"Native American tribal agreements were treated as legislation that had to be passed by both houses of Congress"- wasn't this prior to the congressional action of 1871 ?

Thank you.
MBA Section Director
Joined: 22 May 2017
Affiliations: GMATClub
Posts: 12745
Own Kudos [?]: 8831 [0]
Given Kudos: 3034
GRE 1: Q168 V154
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Education)
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Shahzad hassan wrote:

If this was an inference question than would the answer be option E ?


The author mentions treaties with sovereign nations to compare with the treaties with native tribes. The author doesn't really talk in depth about treaties with sovereign nations. Hence option E would not make an inference.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Feb 2019
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
egmat GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo,

Can you please help with the explanation of the passage and the Qs.

Thanks.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2019
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 23 [0]
Given Kudos: 112
Send PM
Re: In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
Dear Expert,

I have problems with Question 2 - why did they have to add the word "sometimes"?
So sometimes they negotiated, but other times they'd hostile take over??

How can I interpret it? Thanks!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2019
Posts: 150
Own Kudos [?]: 89 [0]
Given Kudos: 51
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.7
Send PM
In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
Can sb shed some light on Q3, firstly I pick (D) for answer, but later found it wrong. I have read the explanation and can understand why (D) is wrong(commentators “didn’t” regard the congressional action of 1871 as the end of the era of formal negotiation between the federal government and Native American tribes)
however, I just cannot understand why (E) be the correct answer…………
Is it because, “the far-reaching impact” can be a “reference”that we choose (E)??

Passage summary
P1:- About decision in the case of Lone Walk and Blue Clark' study.
P2 :- About decision's far reaching impact. (Note by reading 1st line of P2 we may think that author will explain about Blue Clark’s study in this paragraph, but in last line it is clear that author is still talking about decision.)
GMAT Club Bot
In its 1903 decision in the case of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13957 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne