GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 06:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, th

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE: General Management (Other)
In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, th  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 18 Oct 2019, 08:42
1
Question 1
00:00

based on 21 sessions

38% (03:29) correct 62% (03:03) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 33 sessions

42% (01:32) correct 58% (02:01) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 34 sessions

18% (01:52) correct 82% (01:34) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Passage # 398, Date: 18-Oct-2019
This post is a part of New Project RC Butler 2019. Click here for Details

In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, the shopworn verse of an outdated love song. The stars shine no brighter at midnight in midtown than the ones depicted on the time-dimmed ceiling of the waiting room at Grand Central Terminal. The eternal orange glow of the city lights leaves only the faintest hints of the blackness beyond. And when the sky is truly clear and the clouds do not reflect this amber aura, the brightness of the city environs constrict the pupils so much that only the moon can be seen on most evenings. But over the last few weeks it has been possible, even in Manhattan, to watch the evening star—Venus—descending in the west, presenting her orbit, edgewise, to viewers on Earth.

Venus is the luminous body hanging over New Jersey to the west in the early evening. In spite of the fact that it emanates no light of its own—only reflecting light from its neighbour and provider, the sun—it is brighter than any heavenly object visible from Earth except the sun and the moon. For the moment, Venus becomes apparent at twilight, about a third of the way up the western sky, and it sets around 11. Every night people go to bed wondering what strangely bright star that is. To those who live in New York City, it may be the only star they see when trapped on this tiny little island. Whatever the case, in the morning no one remembers that luminous body any longer.

To say, as one must, that Venus is not a star but a planet seems ungrateful, almost pedantic. Astronomers might have us know that this distinction is not a mere splitting of hairs, but the most basic of divisions, not unlike that of plants and animals. Be that as it may, it is the kind of technicality the English essayist Charles Lamb had in mind when defending the generosity of his personal ignorance almost 200 years ago. ―I guess at Venus,‖ he wrote, ―only by her brightness.‖ Lamb was no Copernican, and neither are most of us. We are little Ptolemies every one. The sun rises and sets upon us. When one lies upon a meadow late at night, etherized by the fullness of the sky, it is all one can do to imagine the simplest of celestial motions—the pivoting of constellations around the North Star. To impart to each point of light the motions that are proper to it—to do the unimaginable calculus of all those interfering rotations, those intersecting gravities—is simply impossible. It is easier to imagine that one is staring at the ceiling of a celestial waiting room, forever spinning around and around above our heads.

But at the moment, one can almost picture the motion of Venus in its orbit, as if one were looking at a diagram of the solar system. Imagine a line between the sun, at sunset, and Venus, glittering high above the horizon. That, roughly speaking, is the path of the Venusian orbit. When Venus moves toward Earth, as it is doing now, it is the evening star, and when it moves away from Earth, it is the morning star. Even this, to some, might seem like a stretch of the abilities of conceptualization, but it is worth the challenge. For if one can muddle through this mental errand for a moment, it will become clear that a change is about to take place. The moment of transition will occur on June 10, when Venus passes between the sun and Earth. As May wears on, Venus will appearnearer and nearer the sun, until the planet is engulfed by twilight. Venus will come back into view, at dawn, sometime in late July.

For now, the evening star—Hesperus, as it was anciently known—is a steadily waning crescent, no matter how star-like or globular its light appears. It will not return to its present position until sometime in December 1997. And who knows where we will be by then? Surely someone, but not me, not one of the little Ptolemies, that stares up into the night sky and sees a most beautiful display, arranged every night for his personal enjoyment.

1. Which of the following would support the author‘s phrase, ―We are little Ptolemies (Highlighted)?

A. Most people visualize the night sky from a geocentric point of view and in this way are unable to understand the complex paths of the numerous celestial motions in space.
B. Most people are not as knowledgeable about space as Copernicus or Ptolemy and for them, it is impossible to understand the complexities of numerous celestial motions in space.
C. Those who have studied astronomy are the ones most likely to understand the complexities of numerous celestial motions in space.
D. Those who are aware that Venus is a planet and not a star are still likely to refer to Venus as a star because of its beauty and resemblance to a star in the night sky.
E. Those who are confused as to whether Venus is a planet or a star would do well to read the works of Ptolemy

2. Taking into account all the points made within the context of the passage, the author would most likely support which of the following statements?

A. Venus can be observed in the sky only once every several years and only between May and late July.
B. Venus may be observed first in the western sky and then in the eastern sky between May and late July.
C. Without the astronomical skills of Copernicus, those on Earth are unable to comprehend Venus‘ orbit even though they may identify it by its brightness.
D. Environmental and clean-up efforts should be made in Manhattan so that Venus and the other wonders of the night sky are again visible to those that reside there.
E. Those who think Venus is a star should be educated as to why it is not so.

3. According to information given within the context of the passage, Hesperus is known as the evening star for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:

A. as Hesperus passes between the sun and Earth, it is globular in form and appears star-like.
B. until June 10, Hesperus can only be seen at twilight until about eleven o‘clock at night.
C. Hesperus‘ path toward Earth can be observed only in the evening as it descends in the western sky.
D. except for the sun and the moon, Hesperus is sometimes the brightest object visible from Earth during the early evening.
E. Hesperus is the brightest of all the nine planets and almost as bright as a star.

_________________

Originally posted by GmatWizard on 22 Oct 2018, 08:33.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 18 Oct 2019, 08:42, edited 2 times in total.
Updated - Complete topic (1039).
Director
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE: General Management (Other)
Re: In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, th  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2018, 08:38

Topic and Scope

- The author discusses the orbit of Venus and its appearance from
earth.

Mapping the Passage

¶1 states that at the time of the passage‘s writing, Venus was visible as the ―evening
star.‖
¶2 describes the appearance of Venus and the times at which the planet is visible.
¶3 describes the difficulties in understanding the motion of the stars simply by
looking.
¶4 argues that it‘s possible to nearly imagine the motion of Venus in orbit and
describes this motion.
¶5 discusses Venus‘s orbit and when it will return to its current position.
_________________
Director
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Posts: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GPA: 2.77
WE: General Management (Other)
Re: In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, th  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2018, 08:39

1)

Go back to review the author‘s point in context. The author follows the ―little
Ptolemies‖ statement with the elaboration that ―the sun rises and sets upon us.‖
Looking for an answer choice that fits this earth-cantered point of view immediately
turns up (A).
(B): Distortion. While the author discusses the astronomers, he‘s not using them to
compare their knowledge to regular people, but to contrast their different
astronomical views.
(C): Out of Scope. The author is arguing that ―most of us‖ have little knowledge of
astronomy and so don‘t understand the complexities of space. The case of
those who do have this knowledge is outside the scope of the comment.
(D): Out of Scope. While this might be true, it doesn‘t tie into the author‘s point
about Ptolemies: most don‘t understand the complexities of the universe.
(E): Out of scope.

2)

Go back to ¶3 to review what the author says about Copernicus. The author
mentions Lamb who says that he sees Venus by its brightness. The author follows
this with the statement, ―Lamb was no Copernican, and neither are most of us.‖
Paraphrase this: Copernicus had a good enough grasp of astronomy to understand
what Venus was doing, but we can‘t. (C) captures all of this.
(A): Opposite. While the author implies that the appearance of Venus changes over
a long period of time, this doesn‘t mean that Venus is only visible during a
certain range of years. The author also argues in ¶4 that Venus isn’t visible
between May and July.(B): Opposite. The author argues in ¶4 that between May and July, Venus isn‘t
visible.
(D): Out of Scope. While the author mentions in ¶1 that it‘s difficult to see much in
the Manhattan sky, there‘s no indication from the author that environmental
(E): Out of scope.

3)

Review the location of the author‘s main points about the evening star, primarily in
¶s 1 and 4. As usual with this question type, keep an eye out for something that
contradicts the author‘s argument. (A) not only does this, but also makes no sense.
The author argues in ¶4 that Venus is invisible when passing between the earth
and the sun, which makes sense if one has to look in the direction of the sun to see
Venus.
(B): Opposite. This is a combination of the author‘s points in ¶s 2 and 4 about
Venus‘ visibility during time of day and month.
(C): Opposite. The author makes this point in ¶1.
(D): Opposite. The author states this explicitly in ¶2
(E): Opposite. This can be inferred from the information in the passage.

_________________
Senior RC Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 4136
GPA: 3.39
Re: In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, th  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2019, 08:43
+1 Kudos to posts containing answer explanation of all questions
_________________
Re: In Manhattan, the beauty of the night sky is only a faded metaphor, th   [#permalink] 18 Oct 2019, 08:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by