Jun 22 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jun 23 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes. Jun 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Take 20% off the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Monday, 6/24
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55715

In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2018, 04:15
Question Stats:
77% (01:59) correct 23% (02:20) wrong based on 964 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Project CR Butler: Day 1:Critical Reasoning (CR2) For all CR butler Questions Click HereIn Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house? (A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. (B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. (C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. (D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. (E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 31 Aug 2016
Posts: 288

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2018, 07:17
Bunuel wrote: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing.
Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house?
Our goal: Make change so that the new calculations make it possible for people with below median family income to afford M's median prices house. Prethinking Options: Increase median income or reduce price of median priced house or reduce interest rate or increase the percent of pay that a family could afford to pay for housing (A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. We don't what is value of new median(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. Opposite(C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. Opposite(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. Correct. Lowers the interest rate(E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. Opposite
_________________



Manager
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Posts: 173
Concentration: Technology, Nonprofit
WE: Analyst (NonProfit and Government)

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Aug 2018, 10:41
I got to D by POE.
(A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. irrelevant
(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. does not help to know how the people below can buy houses? opposite if anything
(C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. house more expensive! opposite
(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. rate is lower; less money would have to be paid. HOLD
(E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. if they can only pay 22% instead of 25%, fewer families will be able to buy houses. opposite.



Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4504
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Nov 2018, 07:45
Bunuel wrote: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing.
Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house?
(A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people.
(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000.
(C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000.
(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent.
(E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. Median = Middle Value of a set.... Income : ...............................$ 28,000...............................Price of House : ...............................$ 77,000...............................Interest Rate : 11.2 %The highlighted part of the question stem requires us to find the possibility for the residents to purchase House.... (A) Irrelevant. (B) If annual Income decreases then the citizens may not be able to afford to purchase the house unless The price of the HOuse or the Interest rates decreases. (C) If the price of the house increases then the citizens may not be able to afford to purchase the house unless the income Increases or the Interest rates decreases. (E) Out of scope... Hence correct Answer must be (D)
_________________



Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 11

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Nov 2018, 08:44
The question asks to weaken the argument. The argument is based on:  11.2 percent mortgage interest rate  family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. So any answers that talk about either lower actual mortgage interest rate or higher percent of income for housing will weaken the argument. Only D



Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2300
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2018, 04:58
In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house? To buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house 1. Median family income of 28k $ 2. 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate 3. A family could only afford to pay up to 25% of its income for housing (A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people.  Incorrect  we don't know how the decrease in population has affected the median values (B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. Opposite; Fewer people will able to afford since the initial calculation is based on rule 1 (C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000.  Opposite; Fewer people will be able to afford since median house price was taken as 77K $ in the calculations (D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent.  Correct (E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing.  Opposite; fewer people will be able to afford because the initial calculation is based on Rule 3 Answer D
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it.  Henry Ford The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long +1 Kudos if you find this post helpful



IIMA, IIMC School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1359
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2018, 08:30
DavidTutorexamPAL aragonn VeritasKarishma GMATNinja nightblade354 gmat1393Can you help me in the understanding of argument? Quote: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. Median family income: $28 k Available to buy house: $7 K Additional loan interest: 11.2% I could not comprehend the numbers above. Quote: Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house? So, are we trying to say that above premises are incorrect? We never challenge facts in CR premises, do we?
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination. Feeling stressed, you are not alone!!



SC Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1746

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2018, 09:33
adkikani  No for sure. Given information is absolutely correct as always. For solving this question I would ask you to put urself in this situation and think if you need to purchase a house in given condition what you would do ? Think of it Assuming a situation of when your income is $28k, you can give the above given share, 1/4 of the amount easily. Now Let say your salary decreased to $20k. You need to purchase same house. Which means you need to make same payments. I hope you can see that now you need to pay same amount and that amount will be more than 1/4rth of the amount you have as of now. Premise has clearly stated that  a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. So now with $20k in hand how a family can buy same house.My prethoughts are as following. 1. Suddenly cost of house decreased and its relative to new salary. now you need to pay less amount and may be it come to your 1/4 rth limit. 2. Cause of given interest rate, One has to pay greater amount. If interest rate is somewhat less than this then this one is also possible. I see option D is on those lines. Rest choices are not even close.
_________________
Thanks! Do give some kudos. Simple strategy:“Once you’ve eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”Want to improve your Score:GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 1 GMAT Ninja YouTube! Series 2  How to Improve GMAT Quant from Q49 to a Perfect Q51  Time management My Notes:Reading comprehension  Critical Reasoning  Absolute Phrases  Subjunctive Mood



VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1275

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2018, 14:20
Bunuel wrote: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing.
Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house?
(A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people.
(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000.
(C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000.
(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent.
(E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. Hey adkikani, when you have a doubt which answer choice to choose, use POE i.e. PREDICT, OBSERVE, ELIMINATE  law of GMAT samurai (A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. ( it is out of scope (talks about population)(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. ( it is correction but for the worse )(C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. ( we are not concerned about cost of house)(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. (E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing ( this option wont work because we need to make such corrections so that family with below median salary could afford a house )
So you are left with D



Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2018
Posts: 7
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Nov 2018, 09:33
(A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. > Unrelated to affordability. Incorrect.
(B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. > Same as stated. Incorrect.
(C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. > Inverse of what is asked since Median is increased. Incorrect.
(D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. > Correct. Interest rate decreases.
(E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. > Inverse of what is asked since affordability is decreased. Incorrect.



GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2569
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Nov 2018, 17:46
adkikani wrote: DavidTutorexamPAL aragonn VeritasKarishma GMATNinja nightblade354gmat1393Can you help me in the understanding of argument? Quote: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. Median family income: $28 k Available to buy house: $7 K Additional loan interest: 11.2% I could not comprehend the numbers above. Quote: Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house? So, are we trying to say that above premises are incorrect? We never challenge facts in CR premises, do we? The question itself explicitly gives us permission to change a single fact in the passage. It's very similar to "if true, which of the following..." except that we're given one changed fact, as opposed to one additional fact. As covered by PeepalTree, sandman13, cngthanh190, aragonn, and others (thanks for your explanations!), we can step back from the specific figures and ask ourselves: What kind of change would make the medianpriced house affordable on a belowmedian income? Quote: (A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. Quote: (B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. Huh? (A) and (B) don't fit into this question all. Total population has nothing to do with whether a family can afford to buy a home. And changing to the median income won't help or hurt, because we're specifically concerned with what's affordable on a belowmedian income. That's why we eliminate (A) and (B) immediately. Quote: (C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. If we change the cost of a medianpriced house, then we could definitely make it affordable to more families. But this change goes in the opposite direction of what we want! $80,000 would be less affordable than $77,000, so we'll eliminate (C). Quote: (D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. (D) is basically a better version of (C). This choice identifies a factor that could make houses more affordable: The amount of interest paid on the house's mortgage. And it tells us that the amount of interest is going down. Since nothing else in the passage changes, this would result in more families being able to afford the median priced house  even if they make less than the median income of $28,000 per year. Quote: (E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. Like (C), this choice identifies a variable that determines what families can afford to pay, but it goes in the wrong direction. Since 22% is a lower ceiling than 25%, making this one change would mean poorer families have a harder time buying medianpriced house. I hope this shows how to tackle the question and eliminate answer choices without doing any arithmetic.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 16 May 2016
Posts: 202
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
GPA: 3.5
WE: Analyst (Consulting)

Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Feb 2019, 23:15
Bunuel wrote: Project CR Butler: Day 1:Critical Reasoning (CR2) For all CR butler Questions Click HereIn Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor, calculated that a family with Millington’s median family income, $28,000 a year, could afford to buy Millington’s medianpriced $77,000 house. This calculation was based on an 11.2 percent mortgage interest rate and on the realtor’s assumption that a family could only afford to pay up to 25 percent of its income for housing. Which of the following corrections of a figure appearing in the passage above, if it were the only correction that needed to be made, would yield a new calculation showing that even incomes below the median family income would enable families in Millington to afford Millington’s medianpriced house? (A) Millington’s total population was 45,000 people. (B) Millington’s median annual family income was $27,000. (C) Millington’s medianpriced house cost $80,000. (D) The rate at which people in Millington had to pay mortgage interest was only 10 percent. (E) Families in Millington could only afford to pay up to 22 percent of their annual income for housing. Easy Question. Here is my analysis: If we want to prove that families can afford a house of $77000 even if the median income is $28000, we need to adjust the rate of interest placed on the mortgage. And for lower income rate should be lower. In that sense, D is the only answer.
_________________
Not Giving UP! Kudos if you like the question




Re: In Millington, a city of 50,000 people, Mercedes Pedrosa, a realtor
[#permalink]
05 Feb 2019, 23:15






