Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:01 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
8,661
 [41]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 360
Kudos: 8,661
 [41]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [7]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Taresh23
Joined: 24 Dec 2023
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
63
 [5]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Posts: 58
Kudos: 63
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Elite097
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q1

Let's evaluate each aspect based on the information provided in the passage:

The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffing:

Yes. The researchers mention that the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the likelihood of detecting potential channel stuffing. This indicates that they considered the factors related to the detection of channel stuffing.
The effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it:

Yes. The researchers' analysis shows that companies engaging in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods. This suggests that they considered the effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it.
The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing:

No. The passage discusses what channel stuffing is and how it is typically carried out (e.g., accelerating sales to distributors, offering incentives), but it does not specifically state that the researchers analyzed or considered the methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing.
User avatar
harshchougule
Joined: 26 Sep 2023
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
11
 [4]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 26
Kudos: 11
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Elite097
Q1

Let's evaluate each aspect based on the information provided in the passage:

The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffing:

Yes. The researchers mention that the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the likelihood of detecting potential channel stuffing. This indicates that they considered the factors related to the detection of channel stuffing.
The effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it:

Yes. The researchers' analysis shows that companies engaging in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods. This suggests that they considered the effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it.
The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing:

No. The passage discusses what channel stuffing is and how it is typically carried out (e.g., accelerating sales to distributors, offering incentives), but it does not specifically state that the researchers analyzed or considered the methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing.
­But then how will you differentiate between method and how it is carried out?
method is telling us how it is ussually carried out and that is the one of the methods?

Am i really confused..
User avatar
nust2017
Joined: 04 Sep 2018
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
GPA: 3.33
Posts: 129
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone validate and fix the difficulty level of these questions on GMAT club? All of these questions for this set are shown as "Easy" questions on the OG guide, while they are showing as Hard questions here.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,362
Own Kudos:
778,118
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,966
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,362
Kudos: 778,118
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nust2017
Can someone validate and fix the difficulty level of these questions on GMAT club? All of these questions for this set are shown as "Easy" questions on the OG guide, while they are showing as Hard questions here.

­GMAT and GMAT Club base their difficulty levels on different pools of statistics, so there may be some discrepancies between the two.

The difficulty level of a question on the site, after sufficient attempts, is determined automatically based on various parameters collected from users' attempts via timer, such as the percentage of correct answers and the time taken to answer the question. So, this is a 555-605 Level (medium) question based on our statistics.­
User avatar
rish_dutton
Joined: 13 Feb 2024
Last visit: 17 Sep 2025
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
45
 [2]
Given Kudos: 18
Location: United States
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q90 V82 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V85 DI77
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q85 V83 DI79
GMAT Focus 4: 665 Q86 V85 DI78
GMAT Focus 4: 665 Q86 V85 DI78
Posts: 34
Kudos: 45
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q3 OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:

Apply
The first sentence in the Researchers tab states that companies are more likely to engage in channel stuffing if they have higher growth opportunities (among the 5 companies discussed in the Companies tab, Company E has the highest), higher profit margins (E has the second highest), and less competent management (E has the least). Furthermore, we can infer from the second sentence in that tab that the smaller a company is (E is the smallest) and the lower the company’s auditor’s reputation (E’s has the second lowest) the more likely the company is to engage in channel stuffing. We are told to assume that each of the 5 categories had an equal influence on whether a company engaged in channel stuffing. In 3 of the categories, Company E was the most influenced of the 5 companies to engage in channel stuffing, and in the other 2 categories, it was the second most influenced. Therefore, of the 5 companies discussed, channel stuffing is most likely to be occurring at Company E.
The correct answer is E.
User avatar
Vatsal7794
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 249
Own Kudos:
127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
Posts: 249
Kudos: 127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi KarishmaB

For question 3 the answer is E

Also can you please explain below line
"At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring"

what I inferred is - If Size of company is Large & reputation is high then there is high probability that Channel stuffing would be detected as they are positively related but at the end of the sentence it says "reduces the probability". Why there is contradiction?
Gmatguy007
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Last visit: -
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My approach is the following: based on the second tab, we are looking for a company with high opportunities and profit but low competence. We are informed that as the size and reputation increase, so does the probability of stuffing being detected. This, in turn, has a negative correlation with the occurrence of stuffing. Therefore, we need to find a company with high opportunities and profit but low competence, size, and reputation. The last tab mentions that on a scale of 1-5, the smaller the number, the higher the factor. This means we want the lowest possible numbers for growth and profit but the highest for the other three factors. The only company that meets these criteria is E. Am I correct bb chetan2u Bunuel KarishmaB ?
19071995julia
Q3?
please ;(
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vatsal7794
Hi KarishmaB

For question 3 the answer is E

Also can you please explain below line
"At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring"

what I inferred is - If Size of company is Large & reputation is high then there is high probability that Channel stuffing would be detected as they are positively related but at the end of the sentence it says "reduces the probability". Why there is contradiction?

Thanks for pointing it. Missed some data of tab 2! Edited.


Quote:
"At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring"


What you inferred is correct: If Size of company is Large & reputation is high then there is high probability that Channel stuffing would be detected, IF IT OCCURS.

This is like saying that big companies are under the scanner all the time. So if they do anything illegal, they will get caught. Hence they refrain from doing illegal business.

Since the probability of detection is high (in case the company does engage in channel stuffing), the company refrains from doing it. Makes sense?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, absolutely.

Gmatguy007
My approach is the following: based on the second tab, we are looking for a company with high opportunities and profit but low competence. We are informed that as the size and reputation increase, so does the probability of stuffing being detected. This, in turn, has a negative correlation with the occurrence of stuffing. Therefore, we need to find a company with high opportunities and profit but low competence, size, and reputation. The last tab mentions that on a scale of 1-5, the smaller the number, the higher the factor. This means we want the lowest possible numbers for growth and profit but the highest for the other three factors. The only company that meets these criteria is E. Am I correct bb chetan2u Bunuel KarishmaB ?
19071995julia
Q3?
please ;(
User avatar
Natansha
Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 150
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi KarishmaB

In the 3rd part of 2nd ques, only D & E are a bit off and if we connect the dots for A, B & C, leaving D & E , we get positive correlation, as I have seen in various other questions, we usually go by the majority, leaving one or two points which are off. Do let me know why this isn't the case here.

[color=#005dc2]The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.[/color]

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1
KarishmaB

Question 1.


For each of the following aspects related to channel stuffing, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the aspect was considered by the researchers. Otherwise, select No.


The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffing


Given in tab 2: At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected...
Select Yes

The effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it

Given in tab 2: Further analysis shows that companies that engage in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods,
Select Yes

The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing

This is given in tab 1. This is the Economist's communication. It is not given as a factor considered by the researchers. The factors considered by the researchers are given in tab 2 under Researchers heading.
Select No


Question 2.

For each of the following statements about the 5 companies that were examined by the researchers, select Yes if that statement describes an inference that could reasonably be made from the information provided. Otherwise, select No.


Company size is positively correlated with the reputation of a company's auditors.

Look at the given table and compare Company size with the reputation of a company's auditors.
A 4 5
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 1
E 5 4

There is a strong correlation between them. The company with larger size has more highly reputed auditors. Both 1s, 2s, 3s appear together. A and E companies have 4 and 5 for the two parameters which means they are small and have poor auditor reputation. When one parameter rises, the other also rises similarly. A slight deviation is allowed with positive correlation varies from 0 to 1.
Select Yes

Company management competence is positively correlated with a company's profit margins

A 3 4
B 4 3
C 1 1
D 2 5
E 5 2

Only C is matched - great competence and profit. D and E are opposite high competence low profit and low competence great profit.
A and B are also a little off. Overall, we cannot say that there exists a positive correlation.
Select No

The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1

B and C are matched but D and E are opposite. Think of what the graph will look like.
This is not positive correlated. When one rises, the other should rise too for the most part. This is all over the place.

Attachment:
Screenshot 2024-11-01 at 1.15.57 PM.png

Select No


Question 3.

Assume that the 5 categories examined by the researchers each had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing. Given this assumption and the information provided, of the 5 companies discussed in the Companies tab, channel stuffing is most likely to be occurring at:

Given that all 5 categories had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing.

Given:
Companies with higher growth opportunities, higher profit margins, or less competent management are more likely to engage in channel stuffing. At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring.

Highest probability of channel stuffing occurs when - company size is small and reputation of auditors is low (Numbers 4 and 5 for these two). Competence of management is low (Number 4 or 5 for this). Also, higher growth opportunities and higher profit margins (Numbers 1 and 2 for these two) gives us higher chances of channel stuffing.

For company E, growth opportunities and higher profit margins are low numbers and company size, reputation of auditors and competence of management are high numbers. Everything about E suggests that channel stuffing takes place.

*Select E

Edited*
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Natansha
Hi KarishmaB

In the 3rd part of 2nd ques, only D & E are a bit off and if we connect the dots for A, B & C, leaving D & E , we get positive correlation, as I have seen in various other questions, we usually go by the majority, leaving one or two points which are off. Do let me know why this isn't the case here.

[color=#005dc2]The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.[/color]

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1
KarishmaB

Question 1.


For each of the following aspects related to channel stuffing, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the aspect was considered by the researchers. Otherwise, select No.


The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffing


Given in tab 2: At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected...
Select Yes

The effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it

Given in tab 2: Further analysis shows that companies that engage in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods,
Select Yes

The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing

This is given in tab 1. This is the Economist's communication. It is not given as a factor considered by the researchers. The factors considered by the researchers are given in tab 2 under Researchers heading.
Select No


Question 2.

For each of the following statements about the 5 companies that were examined by the researchers, select Yes if that statement describes an inference that could reasonably be made from the information provided. Otherwise, select No.


Company size is positively correlated with the reputation of a company's auditors.

Look at the given table and compare Company size with the reputation of a company's auditors.
A 4 5
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 1
E 5 4

There is a strong correlation between them. The company with larger size has more highly reputed auditors. Both 1s, 2s, 3s appear together. A and E companies have 4 and 5 for the two parameters which means they are small and have poor auditor reputation. When one parameter rises, the other also rises similarly. A slight deviation is allowed with positive correlation varies from 0 to 1.
Select Yes

Company management competence is positively correlated with a company's profit margins

A 3 4
B 4 3
C 1 1
D 2 5
E 5 2

Only C is matched - great competence and profit. D and E are opposite high competence low profit and low competence great profit.
A and B are also a little off. Overall, we cannot say that there exists a positive correlation.
Select No

The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1

B and C are matched but D and E are opposite. Think of what the graph will look like.
This is not positive correlated. When one rises, the other should rise too for the most part. This is all over the place.

Attachment:
The attachment Screenshot 2024-11-01 at 1.15.57 PM.png is no longer available

Select No


Question 3.

Assume that the 5 categories examined by the researchers each had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing. Given this assumption and the information provided, of the 5 companies discussed in the Companies tab, channel stuffing is most likely to be occurring at:

Given that all 5 categories had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing.

Given:
Companies with higher growth opportunities, higher profit margins, or less competent management are more likely to engage in channel stuffing. At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring.

Highest probability of channel stuffing occurs when - company size is small and reputation of auditors is low (Numbers 4 and 5 for these two). Competence of management is low (Number 4 or 5 for this). Also, higher growth opportunities and higher profit margins (Numbers 1 and 2 for these two) gives us higher chances of channel stuffing.

For company E, growth opportunities and higher profit margins are low numbers and company size, reputation of auditors and competence of management are high numbers. Everything about E suggests that channel stuffing takes place.

*Select E

Edited*
Not sure how you are graphing them but they are not moving in a similar way.

Arrange Growth opportunities in ascending order and plot. The graph of Auditor reputation is all over the place.
Attachments

IMG_3141.JPG
IMG_3141.JPG [ 1.13 MiB | Viewed 2070 times ]

User avatar
Natansha
Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 150
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
That's how i am plotting the graph as well, I have just connected the dots A, B, C which gives an upward sloping graph, if we leave the dots D & E.

KarishmaB
Natansha
Hi KarishmaB

In the 3rd part of 2nd ques, only D & E are a bit off and if we connect the dots for A, B & C, leaving D & E , we get positive correlation, as I have seen in various other questions, we usually go by the majority, leaving one or two points which are off. Do let me know why this isn't the case here.

[color=#005dc2]The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.[/color]

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1
KarishmaB

Question 1.


For each of the following aspects related to channel stuffing, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the aspect was considered by the researchers. Otherwise, select No.


The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffing


Given in tab 2: At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected...
Select Yes

The effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it

Given in tab 2: Further analysis shows that companies that engage in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods,
Select Yes

The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing

This is given in tab 1. This is the Economist's communication. It is not given as a factor considered by the researchers. The factors considered by the researchers are given in tab 2 under Researchers heading.
Select No


Question 2.

For each of the following statements about the 5 companies that were examined by the researchers, select Yes if that statement describes an inference that could reasonably be made from the information provided. Otherwise, select No.


Company size is positively correlated with the reputation of a company's auditors.

Look at the given table and compare Company size with the reputation of a company's auditors.
A 4 5
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 1
E 5 4

There is a strong correlation between them. The company with larger size has more highly reputed auditors. Both 1s, 2s, 3s appear together. A and E companies have 4 and 5 for the two parameters which means they are small and have poor auditor reputation. When one parameter rises, the other also rises similarly. A slight deviation is allowed with positive correlation varies from 0 to 1.
Select Yes

Company management competence is positively correlated with a company's profit margins

A 3 4
B 4 3
C 1 1
D 2 5
E 5 2

Only C is matched - great competence and profit. D and E are opposite high competence low profit and low competence great profit.
A and B are also a little off. Overall, we cannot say that there exists a positive correlation.
Select No

The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1

B and C are matched but D and E are opposite. Think of what the graph will look like.
This is not positive correlated. When one rises, the other should rise too for the most part. This is all over the place.

Attachment:
Screenshot 2024-11-01 at 1.15.57 PM.png

Select No


Question 3.

Assume that the 5 categories examined by the researchers each had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing. Given this assumption and the information provided, of the 5 companies discussed in the Companies tab, channel stuffing is most likely to be occurring at:

Given that all 5 categories had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing.

Given:
Companies with higher growth opportunities, higher profit margins, or less competent management are more likely to engage in channel stuffing. At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring.

Highest probability of channel stuffing occurs when - company size is small and reputation of auditors is low (Numbers 4 and 5 for these two). Competence of management is low (Number 4 or 5 for this). Also, higher growth opportunities and higher profit margins (Numbers 1 and 2 for these two) gives us higher chances of channel stuffing.

For company E, growth opportunities and higher profit margins are low numbers and company size, reputation of auditors and competence of management are high numbers. Everything about E suggests that channel stuffing takes place.

*Select E

Edited*
Not sure how you are graphing them but they are not moving in a similar way.

Arrange Growth opportunities in ascending order and plot. The graph of Auditor reputation is all over the place.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Comsidering we have 5 data points, we cannot ignore 2. If we had 20 data points, then may be.

Natansha
That's how i am plotting the graph as well, I have just connected the dots A, B, C which gives an upward sloping graph, if we leave the dots D & E.

User avatar
MegB07
Joined: 15 Sep 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 54
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
In Question 1,

The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing

This is given in tab 1. This is the Economist's communication. It is not given as a factor considered by the researchers. The factors considered by the researchers are given in tab 2 under Researchers heading.
Select No

The first tab last 2 lines do suggest methods that a company uses to engage in channel stuffing. Line starting from 'This....'. Please tell how am i analysing it wrong here
KarishmaB



Question 1.


For each of the following aspects related to channel stuffing, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the aspect was considered by the researchers. Otherwise, select No.


The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffing


Given in tab 2: At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected...
Select Yes

The effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in it

Given in tab 2: Further analysis shows that companies that engage in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods,
Select Yes

The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffing

This is given in tab 1. This is the Economist's communication. It is not given as a factor considered by the researchers. The factors considered by the researchers are given in tab 2 under Researchers heading.
Select No


Question 2.

For each of the following statements about the 5 companies that were examined by the researchers, select Yes if that statement describes an inference that could reasonably be made from the information provided. Otherwise, select No.


Company size is positively correlated with the reputation of a company's auditors.

Look at the given table and compare Company size with the reputation of a company's auditors.
A 4 5
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 1
E 5 4

There is a strong correlation between them. The company with larger size has more highly reputed auditors. Both 1s, 2s, 3s appear together. A and E companies have 4 and 5 for the two parameters which means they are small and have poor auditor reputation. When one parameter rises, the other also rises similarly. A slight deviation is allowed with positive correlation varies from 0 to 1.
Select Yes

Company management competence is positively correlated with a company's profit margins

A 3 4
B 4 3
C 1 1
D 2 5
E 5 2

Only C is matched - great competence and profit. D and E are opposite high competence low profit and low competence great profit.
A and B are also a little off. Overall, we cannot say that there exists a positive correlation.
Select No

The reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.

A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1

B and C are matched but D and E are opposite. Think of what the graph will look like.
This is not positive correlated. When one rises, the other should rise too for the most part. This is all over the place.

Attachment:
Screenshot 2024-11-01 at 1.15.57 PM.png

Select No


Question 3.

Assume that the 5 categories examined by the researchers each had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing. Given this assumption and the information provided, of the 5 companies discussed in the Companies tab, channel stuffing is most likely to be occurring at:

Given that all 5 categories had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing.

Given:
Companies with higher growth opportunities, higher profit margins, or less competent management are more likely to engage in channel stuffing. At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring.

Highest probability of channel stuffing occurs when - company size is small and reputation of auditors is low (Numbers 4 and 5 for these two). Competence of management is low (Number 4 or 5 for this). Also, higher growth opportunities and higher profit margins (Numbers 1 and 2 for these two) gives us higher chances of channel stuffing.

For company E, growth opportunities and higher profit margins are low numbers and company size, reputation of auditors and competence of management are high numbers. Everything about E suggests that channel stuffing takes place.

*Select E

Edited*
Moderators:
Math Expert
105362 posts
496 posts