In the 3rd part of 2nd ques, only D & E are a bit off and if we connect the dots for A, B & C, leaving D & E , we get positive correlation, as I have seen in various other questions, we usually go by the majority, leaving one or two points which are off. Do let me know why this isn't the case here.
Question 1. For each of the following aspects related to channel stuffing, select Yes if the information provided indicates that the aspect was considered by the researchers. Otherwise, select No.The factors that are correlated with the detection of channel stuffingGiven in tab 2: At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected...Select YesThe effects of channel stuffing on companies that engage in itGiven in tab 2:
Further analysis shows that companies that engage in channel stuffing experience declines in sales and profitability in future periods,Select Yes
The methods a company can use to engage in channel stuffingThis is given in tab 1. This is the Economist's communication. It is not given as a factor considered by the researchers. The factors considered by the researchers are given in tab 2 under Researchers heading.
Select NoQuestion 2.For each of the following statements about the 5 companies that were examined by the researchers, select Yes if that statement describes an inference that could reasonably be made from the information provided. Otherwise, select No.Company size is positively correlated with the reputation of a company's auditors.Look at the given table and compare
Company size with the reputation of a company's auditors.
A 4 5
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 1
E 5 4
There is a strong correlation between them. The company with larger size has more highly reputed auditors. Both 1s, 2s, 3s appear together. A and E companies have 4 and 5 for the two parameters which means they are small and have poor auditor reputation. When one parameter rises, the other also rises similarly. A slight deviation is allowed with positive correlation varies from 0 to 1.
Select YesCompany management competence is positively correlated with a company's profit marginsA 3 4
B 4 3
C 1 1
D 2 5
E 5 2
Only C is matched - great competence and profit. D and E are opposite high competence low profit and low competence great profit.
A and B are also a little off. Overall, we cannot say that there exists a positive correlation.
Select NoThe reputation of a company's auditors is positively correlated with company growth opportunities.A 5 4
B 2 2
C 3 3
D 1 5
E 4 1
B and C are matched but D and E are opposite. Think of what the graph will look like.
This is not positive correlated. When one rises, the other should rise too for the most part. This is all over the place.
Attachment:
The attachment Screenshot 2024-11-01 at 1.15.57 PM.png is no longer available
Select NoQuestion 3. Assume that the 5 categories examined by the researchers each had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing. Given this assumption and the information provided, of the 5 companies discussed in the Companies tab, channel stuffing is most likely to be occurring at:Given that all
5 categories had an equal influence on the probability that a particular company is engaging in channel stuffing. Given:Companies with higher growth opportunities, higher profit margins, or less competent management are more likely to engage in channel stuffing. At the same time, our research shows that both the size of the company and the reputation of the company's auditors are positively correlated with the probability that any potential channel stuffing would be detected, and this, in turn, reduces the probability of channel stuffing occurring.Highest probability of channel stuffing occurs when - company size is small and reputation of auditors is low (Numbers 4 and 5 for these two). Competence of management is low (Number 4 or 5 for this). Also, higher growth opportunities and higher profit margins (Numbers 1 and 2 for these two) gives us higher chances of channel stuffing. For company E, growth opportunities and higher profit margins are low numbers and company size, reputation of auditors and competence of management are high numbers. Everything about E suggests that channel stuffing takes place. *Select EEdited*