Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
17 Jan 2024, 23:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
X: Businesses from misleading consumers.
Y: Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
61% (02:03) correct
39%
(02:15)
wrong
based on 1052
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In sociology, there is a concept known as perverse incentives - these are said to occur when a deliberate action taken towards a particular goal, inadvertently incentivizes actions that complicate the said goal.
Imagine that a government reclassified events of false advertising from a misdemeanor to a felony, significantly increasing the penalty associated with the crime.
In different rows of the table, select situation X and situation Y such that, if the government’s action was to discourage X but inadvertently encouraged Y, the combined situation would best illustrate the concept of perverse incentives.
Imagine that a government reclassified events of false advertising from a misdemeanor to a felony, significantly increasing the penalty associated with the crime.
In different rows of the table, select situation X and situation Y such that, if the government’s action was to discourage X but inadvertently encouraged Y, the combined situation would best illustrate the concept of perverse incentives.
| X | Y | |
| Instances of false advertising sometimes being serious enough to warrant jailtime. | ||
| Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising. | ||
| The prosecution of false advertising taking longer to complete. | ||
| Businesses from misleading consumers. | ||
| Businesses complying with the law. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
X: Businesses from misleading consumers.
Y: Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising.
18 Jan 2024, 21:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
No the government action will discourage X but will lead to an unwarranted complicated situation Y.
Clearly, government action would lead to bring down businesses by misleading customers. On the other hand, it could also lead to the business houses finding ways to make it difficult for the government to catch these.
Answer
X= Businesses from misleading consumers.
Y= Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising.
Clearly, government action would lead to bring down businesses by misleading customers. On the other hand, it could also lead to the business houses finding ways to make it difficult for the government to catch these.
Answer
X= Businesses from misleading consumers.
Y= Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising.
20 Jan 2024, 14:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
Official Explanation
We need to consider a scenario where the government has reclassified events of false advertising from a misdemeanor to a felony, significantly increasing the penalty associated with the crime. For this scenario, we need to select situation X and situation Y such that, if the government’s action was to discourage X but inadvertently encouraged Y, the combined situation would best illustrate the concept of perverse incentives.
A. Since the government increased penalties associated with the crime of false advertising, we can logically conclude that it did not intend to discourage instances of false advertising serious enough to warrant jail time; thus, this is not the correct answer choice for the X column. There is also no information provided to conclude that increasing the penalty associated with the crime would encourage instances of false advertising serious enough to warrant jail time. Thus, this is also not the correct answer choice for the Y column.
B. Since the government's actions have increased the penalties associated with instances of false advertising, one can logically conclude that the government aimed to discourage businesses from engaging in false advertising. If businesses engage in record manipulation to conceal false advertising and avoid these penalties, then this would be an example of a situation that was inadvertently caused due to the increase in penalties for false advertising, making the process of discouraging businesses from engaging in false advertising more complicated.
Hence, “Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising” is the correct answer choice for the Y column.
C. There is no information provided to suggest the government intended to increase the time taken to prosecute false advertising; thus, this is not the correct answer choice for the X column. There is also no information provided to conclude that increasing the penalty associated with the crime would increase the time taken to prosecute false advertising. Thus, this is also not the correct answer choice for the Y column.
D. Since the government’s actions increased the penalty associated with events of false advertising, one can logically conclude that the government aimed to discourage businesses from misleading consumers.
Hence, “Businesses from misleading consumers” is the correct answer choice for the X column.
E. Since the government’s actions increased the penalty associated with events of false advertising, one can conclude that the government would prefer businesses comply with the law; thus, businesses complying with the law is not a situation that the government intended to discourage. Further, as the government would prefer that businesses follow the law, we can reasonably conclude that their doing so cannot be described as a situation that was inadvertently encouraged due to the government’s actions.
Hence, D is the correct answer choice for the X column, and B is the correct answer choice for the Y column.
We need to consider a scenario where the government has reclassified events of false advertising from a misdemeanor to a felony, significantly increasing the penalty associated with the crime. For this scenario, we need to select situation X and situation Y such that, if the government’s action was to discourage X but inadvertently encouraged Y, the combined situation would best illustrate the concept of perverse incentives.
A. Since the government increased penalties associated with the crime of false advertising, we can logically conclude that it did not intend to discourage instances of false advertising serious enough to warrant jail time; thus, this is not the correct answer choice for the X column. There is also no information provided to conclude that increasing the penalty associated with the crime would encourage instances of false advertising serious enough to warrant jail time. Thus, this is also not the correct answer choice for the Y column.
B. Since the government's actions have increased the penalties associated with instances of false advertising, one can logically conclude that the government aimed to discourage businesses from engaging in false advertising. If businesses engage in record manipulation to conceal false advertising and avoid these penalties, then this would be an example of a situation that was inadvertently caused due to the increase in penalties for false advertising, making the process of discouraging businesses from engaging in false advertising more complicated.
Hence, “Businesses indulging in record fudging to hide false advertising” is the correct answer choice for the Y column.
C. There is no information provided to suggest the government intended to increase the time taken to prosecute false advertising; thus, this is not the correct answer choice for the X column. There is also no information provided to conclude that increasing the penalty associated with the crime would increase the time taken to prosecute false advertising. Thus, this is also not the correct answer choice for the Y column.
D. Since the government’s actions increased the penalty associated with events of false advertising, one can logically conclude that the government aimed to discourage businesses from misleading consumers.
Hence, “Businesses from misleading consumers” is the correct answer choice for the X column.
E. Since the government’s actions increased the penalty associated with events of false advertising, one can conclude that the government would prefer businesses comply with the law; thus, businesses complying with the law is not a situation that the government intended to discourage. Further, as the government would prefer that businesses follow the law, we can reasonably conclude that their doing so cannot be described as a situation that was inadvertently encouraged due to the government’s actions.
Hence, D is the correct answer choice for the X column, and B is the correct answer choice for the Y column.
