GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Feb 2019, 09:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

February 24, 2019

February 24, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

# In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 733
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 17 Nov 2018, 05:06
1
5
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

87% (01:25) correct 13% (01:29) wrong based on 664 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were

_________________

Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Originally posted by ykaiim on 16 Jun 2010, 04:45.
Last edited by Skywalker18 on 17 Nov 2018, 05:06, edited 1 time in total.
formatted
Manager
Status: Prepping for the last time....
Joined: 28 May 2010
Posts: 118
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.2
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 06:52
Initially it was A/E for me. But A is too wordy with unnecessary that + verb form after there + verb form.

E is concise.
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 369
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2010, 00:22
yeah, i agree w/ everyone here. E is best: most direct (active voice) and concise way to say it
_________________

kudos if you like me (or my post)

Senior Manager
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 442
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 00:04
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?
_________________

hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.

Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/who-says-you-need-a-149706.html#p1201595

My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/end-of-my-gmat-journey-149328.html#p1197992

VP
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 1102
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Schools: Duke '16 (M)
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 09:45
1
Sachin9 wrote:
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?

out of the 2 constructions:

A.) "there were substantial supplies of coal that was"
AND
E.) "substantial supplies of coal were"

the second construction is much better; says the same thing in fewer words.
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Haas EWMBA '17
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 12:48
1
1
Sachin9 wrote:
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?

Yes singular verb 'was' contradicts with plural noun "supplies of coal".

Also (A) uses wordier construction than (E)
(A) Wordier: there were substantial supplies of coal that was
(E) Concise: substantial supplies of coal were
_________________

Thanks,
Prashant Ponde

Tough 700+ Level RCs: Passage1 | Passage2 | Passage3 | Passage4 | Passage5 | Passage6 | Passage7
VOTE GMAT Practice Tests: Vote Here
PowerScore CR Bible - Official Guide 13 Questions Set Mapped: Click here

Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 21:52
I believe (A) is the answer, even though (A) is wordier than (E)

"substantial supplies of coal were exported" or "the coal was exported" ? Obviously the coal was exported not the supplies ...

What is the OA?
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1101
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2013, 22:39
Practicegmat wrote:
I believe (A) is the answer, even though (A) is wordier than (E)

"substantial supplies of coal were exported" or "the coal was exported" ? Obviously the coal was exported not the supplies ...

What is the OA?

Just coal can mean anything i.e. in small quantity as well as in large quantity. The logic of the sentence asks for the coal in large quantity. Also, in A "that" modifies "substantial supplies of coal" and not "coal".
Regards.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Location: Zimbabwe
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2013, 21:03
Practicegmat wrote:
I believe (A) is the answer, even though (A) is wordier than (E)

"substantial supplies of coal were exported" or "the coal was exported" ? Obviously the coal was exported not the supplies ...

What is the OA?

The mistake you are making is just looking at a small portion of the sentence. "substantial supplies of coal were exported" and "substantial supplies of coal was exported". By comparing the two you can just use your ear and hear that the second one is wrong.
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 813
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2013, 08:52
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were
substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were
substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been
substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies
of coal being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of
coal were

the focus of meaning in A is changed. A is considered the distorted meaning.

when the canale reached, there were something

is the focus of meaning in A.

in E,

comma+with phrase is absolute structure which provide the context for main clause, in this case, "coalfield open and canal reached" . E means
in the context that the export rises, coalfield opened. This is not logic.

E is typical wrong answer which is grammatical but contains meaning problem. absolute phrase modifying wrongly the main clause is the favorite of gmat. this situation happen often in og and gmatprep.

gmat distort the logic meaning relation into the distorted meaning relation to test out ability to convey the intended meaning or the right focus of meaning.
Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 813
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2013, 08:53
sorry, my analysis of absolute phrase above in in choice D not E. sorry
Manager
Joined: 31 May 2012
Posts: 112
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Feb 2013, 20:33
I couldn't find any error in D also. the sentence after 'and' is an independent one. Please check options D & E below.

D) canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

E) as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways

Clause that starts with 'as' is a conditional clause. Is it correct to use second clause with 'as' ?
Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Posts: 17
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 4
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Apr 2015, 12:05
Hi,

D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being-" This somehow seems to imply that the canals and railroads reached into the region because of substantial supplies of coal were exported.Meaning issue"-INCORRECT.

E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were-" 'as canals...' presents a reason as of why the substantial supplies of coal were exported."-CORRECT.

Hope it helps.

Thanks.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2232
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2018, 05:18
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was - subject verb agreement issue - supplies of coal needs was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been - usage of having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal - usage of past perfect
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being - usage of being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were - Correct

1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

2. Also, if change A to "when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that were", even then it will be inferior to option E?

3. Also, can you highlight the difference between when and as here?

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , ChiranjeevSingh , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyMurray , daagh , ccooley , other experts - please enlighten
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 418
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2018, 06:12
1
1
Skywalker18 wrote:
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was - subject verb agreement issue - supplies of coal needs was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been - usage of having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal - usage of past perfect
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being - usage of being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were - Correct

1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

Since "that" is placed directly after "coal", it seems likely that "that" refers to "coal." Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies."

2. Also, if change A to "when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that were", even then it will be inferior to option E?

Even with that change, (A) would be awkward and would not express a logical meaning. It does not make sense to say that "there were" supplies of coal "when" canals and railroads reached into the region. Those supplies were there before the canals and railroads reached the region. So, the focus of (A) is off, as (A) is focused on the fact that the supplies were there, when what would make sense is to focus on the fact that, once canals and railroads reached the region, the supplies were exported.

3. Also, can you highlight the difference between when and as here?

While using "when" is not clearly incorrect, perhaps "as" is a better choice. "When" tends to refer to a specific point in time. So, "when the canals and railroads reached into the region, supplies were exported" seems to convey that, at the moment when canals and railroads reached into the region, the supplies were exported. In contrast, the expression "as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region" more accurately reflects what seems likely to have occurred, that during the period of time over which the canals and railroads reached into the region, supplies of coal were exported.

Responses in green above.
_________________

Marty Murray
Chief Curriculum and Content Architect

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2232
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2018, 08:23
MartyMurray wrote:
1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

Since "that" is placed directly after "coal", it seems likely that "that" refers to "coal." Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies."

Hi MartyMurray,
Thank you for your prompt response. So can we generalize as "whenever the verb that follows modifier THAT(or which) makes sense with both the preceding noun(supplies here) and the object of the prepositional phrase(coal here), then it MUST refer to the noun in the prepositional phrase because of its proximity?

..... X of Y that Z or ..... X of Y, which Z (where Z is the verb) --> If Z makes sense with both X and Y, then it must refer to Y.

Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular noun "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies. --> If the verb (was in this case) was not a part of the underlined portion of the sentence, then I understand we can infer that subject must match with the verb, but here the verb too is in the underlined part.

So, can we use the subject-verb agreement to confirm our assumption that "coal" is the subject of THAT clause?

I understand that the structure in A "there were substantial supplies..." is awkward and indirect. So this was the ONLY reason you chose it over E?
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Posts: 418
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Nov 2018, 11:32
1
Skywalker18 wrote:
MartyMurray wrote:
1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

Since "that" is placed directly after "coal", it seems likely that "that" refers to "coal." Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies."

Hi MartyMurray,
Thank you for your prompt response. So can we generalize as "whenever the verb that follows modifier THAT(or which) makes sense with both the preceding noun(supplies here) and the object of the prepositional phrase(coal here), then it MUST refer to the noun in the prepositional phrase because of its proximity?

..... X of Y that Z or ..... X of Y, which Z (where Z is the verb) --> If Z makes sense with both X and Y, then it must refer to Y.

You probably shouldn't make that generalization. Answering SC questions tends to be about making judgement calls. So, while, yes, it is likely that what you said would work most of the time, I would not codify it and consider it some kind of "rule." Why even bother?

Do what is logical, and make judgement calls AS APPROPRIATE FOR EACH SITUATION.

Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular noun "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies. --> If the verb (was in this case) was not a part of the underlined portion of the sentence, then I understand we can infer that subject must match with the verb, but here the verb too is in the underlined part.

So, can we use the subject-verb agreement to confirm our assumption that "coal" is the subject of THAT clause?

That method works for determining what the underlined portion indicates in this case. However, if the non-underlined portion is in disagreement with what the underlined portion indicates, as it is to a degree in this case,then the sentence is in disagreement with itself, and therefore flawed. Once again, you have to determine whether the whole sentence works, rather than look at a little piece of it and attempt to apply some rule that you have heard about or come up with.

Rocking Sentence Correction is not a robotic, rules based activity. The question writers constantly come up with new twists. You have to make judgement calls on a case by case basis. Yes, some rules matter, but attempting to codify every little thing is not your best move.

You seem to have a good sense of what makes sense. To learn to rock SC, you could develop your skill in applying your sense of logic to answering SC questions.

I understand that the structure in A "there were substantial supplies..." is awkward and indirect. So this was the ONLY reason you chose it over E?

(E) is better than (A) because of what you just said, because "as" is a little better than "when", and because "supplies ... were exported" makes much more sense than does "supplies of coal that was exported". What does that last phrase even mean? Think about it. "There were supplies of coal that was exported." What??? So, the supplies are of exported coal only? It's a nonsensical string of words.

Responses in green above.
_________________

Marty Murray
Chief Curriculum and Content Architect

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 524
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2019, 07:11
ykaiim wrote:
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were

look at choice D.
the absolute phrase "with substantial..." can not be interchangeble with "as canal...." because absolute phrase must have meaning relation with the main clause while "as" clause only shows the time relation with the main clause. the time relation here is that an action happen during another action.

absolute phrase can be interchangeble with dependent clause "because"
because he is sick, I visit him today
He sick, I visit him today.

whenever we see a split between a sentence with absolute phrase and a sentence with dependent clause, ask ourself are they interchangeble ?
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 524
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2019, 07:31
Sachin9 wrote:
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?

choice A distort the meaning
when canal reach the region, there are a supplies of coal.
this is main meaning of the choice A. it is not logic.
when canal reach the region, supplies of coal were exported. this meaning is correct
Re: In the 1820s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern   [#permalink] 25 Jan 2019, 07:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by