Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:38 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
teaserbae
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2022
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 191
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sampriya
User avatar
ISB School Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2018
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 301
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 2.88
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sachin9
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?


yes, "was" as a verb refers to a singular noun.. however the noun is "supplies" which is plural therefore were is correct!
avatar
Krishchamp
Joined: 02 Mar 2020
Last visit: 20 Nov 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 39
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is wrong with option D? Can someone please explain?

In the 1820???s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation???s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krishchamp
What is wrong with option D? Can someone please explain?

In the 1820???s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation???s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were
Hello, Krishchamp. Beyond the fact that choice (E) uses more direct language, I would argue that the causality of the chain of events is missing in (D). We understand from choices (A), (B), and (E) that when/once/as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, the natural resources, namely coal, were exported in great quantities. However, choice (D) does not present the same sort of cause-and-effect relationship, telling us instead that the canals and railroads appeared, but then moving on to this not necessarily connected notion that because of these developments, substantial supplies of coal were exported. Clarity of meaning is the foremost consideration in determining an eventual correct answer, particularly on harder questions in which grammatical issues alone might not allow you to separate one choice from another. (In general, it is a good idea to be wary of being, although it can be used as a gerund in correct answers.)

If you are still confused, feel free to ask away. Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
avatar
Krishchamp
Joined: 02 Mar 2020
Last visit: 20 Nov 2023
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 39
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks so much Andrew?
We can also eliminate B and C because there is no parallelism between ‘opened’ and ‘reaching’ right? A is wrong because ‘was’ is faulty w.r.t ‘supplies’.
Can you please check if my reasoning is correct?

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krishchamp
Thanks so much Andrew?
We can also eliminate B and C because there is no parallelism between ‘opened’ and ‘reaching’ right? A is wrong because ‘was’ is faulty w.r.t ‘supplies’.
Can you please check if my reasoning is correct?

Posted from my mobile device
Hello again, Krishchamp. I agree with you on (A) and (B), but (C) is a little different. My red highlights below show errors.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being

In (C), it is not a problem to say, with canals... reaching on its own, but the past perfect had been indicates an action that occurred further in the past than another, and it would not make sense to suggest that coal had been shipped out in vast amounts prior to the construction of the canal and railroad lanes that opened up such transportation pathways.

I hope that helps. If not, you know how to grab my attention.

- Andrew
User avatar
svasan05
User avatar
CrackVerbal Representative
Joined: 02 Mar 2019
Last visit: 24 Feb 2023
Posts: 269
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 269
Kudos: 302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was Use of singular verb "was" to refer to plural "supplies" is incorrect. Also, "there were...that was" is too wordy. Eliminate.

B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been Present continuous tense "reaching" for an event in the past is incorrect. Use of present perfect continuous tense "having been" for an action restricted to the past is incorrect. Eliminate.

C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal Use of past perfect "has been" is incorrect as it is not referring to the earlier to two events occurring in the past. Eliminate.

D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being "with" implies that canals/rails reaching and coal exporting occurred simultaneously, which is incorrect. Eliminate.

E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were Correct answer.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Vatsal7794
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 249
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
Posts: 249
Kudos: 127
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja @VeritasKarishma EducationAisle ChrisLele mikemcgarry AjiteshArun egmat sayantanc2k RonPurewal DmitryFarber MagooshExpert avigutman EMPOWERgmatVerbal MartyTargetTestPrep ExpertsGlobal5 other experts


Can you please tell me how in option E subject and verb is making sense

"Supplies ... were exported...".


It's the coal that is exported right?
Meaning wise option E seems wrong

Supplies also mean stocks and that's why it makes sense (Is this correct reasoning)
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,931
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vatsal7794
Supplies also mean stocks and that's why it makes sense (Is this correct reasoning)
What was the first meaning you had in mind for "supplies", Vatsal7794?
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vatsal7794
Hi GMATNinja @VeritasKarishma EducationAisle ChrisLele mikemcgarry AjiteshArun egmat sayantanc2k RonPurewal DmitryFarber MagooshExpert avigutman EMPOWERgmatVerbal MartyTargetTestPrep ExpertsGlobal5 other experts


Can you please tell me how in option E subject and verb is making sense

"Supplies ... were exported...".


It's the coal that is exported right?
Meaning wise option E seems wrong

Supplies also mean stocks and that's why it makes sense (Is this correct reasoning)

Hello Vatsal7794,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, in Option E the subject is the noun phrase "supplies of coal"; in this phrase "supplies" functions as a unit of sorts for the coal.

For example, "That box of apples has gone bad." - "apples" is plural, but because the unit "box" is singular, the singular verb "has gone" is correct.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts