Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:57 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ykaiim
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 519
Own Kudos:
5,901
 [31]
Given Kudos: 40
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Posts: 519
Kudos: 5,901
 [31]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
27
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [8]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [8]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Sachin9
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Last visit: 25 Dec 2015
Posts: 351
Own Kudos:
174
 [1]
Given Kudos: 562
Status:Gonna rock this time!!!
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Posts: 351
Kudos: 174
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jumsumtak
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2023
Posts: 1,092
Own Kudos:
594
 [2]
Given Kudos: 479
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Posts: 1,092
Kudos: 594
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sachin9
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?

out of the 2 constructions:

A.) "there were substantial supplies of coal that was"
AND
E.) "substantial supplies of coal were"

the second construction is much better; says the same thing in fewer words.
User avatar
PrashantPonde
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
2,738
 [3]
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 321
Kudos: 2,738
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sachin9
whats wrong with A folks..

is the presence of 'was' instead of 'were' an issue?

Yes singular verb 'was' contradicts with plural noun "supplies of coal".

Also (A) uses wordier construction than (E)
(A) Wordier: there were substantial supplies of coal that was
(E) Concise: substantial supplies of coal were
User avatar
Practicegmat
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Last visit: 16 Dec 2014
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 166
Status:Time to apply!
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 94
Kudos: 539
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I believe (A) is the answer, even though (A) is wordier than (E)


"substantial supplies of coal were exported" or "the coal was exported" ? Obviously the coal was exported not the supplies ...

What is the OA?
User avatar
Marcab
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 850
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 221
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 850
Kudos: 4,853
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Practicegmat
I believe (A) is the answer, even though (A) is wordier than (E)


"substantial supplies of coal were exported" or "the coal was exported" ? Obviously the coal was exported not the supplies ...

What is the OA?
Just coal can mean anything i.e. in small quantity as well as in large quantity. The logic of the sentence asks for the coal in large quantity. Also, in A "that" modifies "substantial supplies of coal" and not "coal".
Regards.
User avatar
thangvietname
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 522
Own Kudos:
561
 [1]
Given Kudos: 916
Posts: 522
Kudos: 561
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were
substantial supplies of coal that was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were
substantial supplies of coal having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been
substantial supplies of coal
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies
of coal being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of
coal were

the focus of meaning in A is changed. A is considered the distorted meaning.

when the canale reached, there were something

is the focus of meaning in A.

in E,

comma+with phrase is absolute structure which provide the context for main clause, in this case, "coalfield open and canal reached" . E means
in the context that the export rises, coalfield opened. This is not logic.

E is typical wrong answer which is grammatical but contains meaning problem. absolute phrase modifying wrongly the main clause is the favorite of gmat. this situation happen often in og and gmatprep.

gmat distort the logic meaning relation into the distorted meaning relation to test out ability to convey the intended meaning or the right focus of meaning.
User avatar
pramendrapandeya
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Last visit: 14 Feb 2016
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
55
 [1]
Given Kudos: 66
Schools: IIMA
Schools: IIMA
Posts: 33
Kudos: 55
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E is answer, as in A (S-V error )

there were substantial supplies of coal that was -should be were
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,961
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,961
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was exported to the nation’s growing mills, forges, factories, and railways.

A. when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that was - subject verb agreement issue - supplies of coal needs was
B. once canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal having been - usage of having been
C. with canals and eventually railroads reaching into the region, there had been substantial supplies of coal - usage of past perfect
D. canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, with substantial supplies of coal being - usage of being
E. as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were - Correct

Answer E
1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

2. Also, if change A to "when canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, there were substantial supplies of coal that were", even then it will be inferior to option E?

3. Also, can you highlight the difference between when and as here?


AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , MagooshExpert , GMATGuruNY , VeritasKarishma , ChiranjeevSingh , VeritasPrepBrian , MartyMurray , daagh , ccooley , other experts - please enlighten
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,961
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray

1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

Since "that" is placed directly after "coal", it seems likely that "that" refers to "coal." Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies."

Hi MartyMurray,
Thank you for your prompt response. So can we generalize as "whenever the verb that follows modifier THAT(or which) makes sense with both the preceding noun(supplies here) and the object of the prepositional phrase(coal here), then it MUST refer to the noun in the prepositional phrase because of its proximity?

..... X of Y that Z or ..... X of Y, which Z (where Z is the verb) --> If Z makes sense with both X and Y, then it must refer to Y.

Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular noun "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies. --> If the verb (was in this case) was not a part of the underlined portion of the sentence, then I understand we can infer that subject must match with the verb, but here the verb too is in the underlined part.

So, can we use the subject-verb agreement to confirm our assumption that "coal" is the subject of THAT clause?


I understand that the structure in A "there were substantial supplies..." is awkward and indirect. So this was the ONLY reason you chose it over E?
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
MartyMurray

1. In case of option A, how do we determine whether THAT refers to coal or supplies of coal? Because both of them make sense to me.

Since "that" is placed directly after "coal", it seems likely that "that" refers to "coal." Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies."

Hi MartyMurray,
Thank you for your prompt response. So can we generalize as "whenever the verb that follows modifier THAT(or which) makes sense with both the preceding noun(supplies here) and the object of the prepositional phrase(coal here), then it MUST refer to the noun in the prepositional phrase because of its proximity?

..... X of Y that Z or ..... X of Y, which Z (where Z is the verb) --> If Z makes sense with both X and Y, then it must refer to Y.

You probably shouldn't make that generalization. Answering SC questions tends to be about making judgement calls. So, while, yes, it is likely that what you said would work most of the time, I would not codify it and consider it some kind of "rule." Why even bother?

Do what is logical, and make judgement calls AS APPROPRIATE FOR EACH SITUATION.


Then, the fact that the singular verb "was" agrees with the singular noun "coal" and not with the plural "supplies" serves to confirm that "that" refers to coal rather than to "supplies. --> If the verb (was in this case) was not a part of the underlined portion of the sentence, then I understand we can infer that subject must match with the verb, but here the verb too is in the underlined part.

So, can we use the subject-verb agreement to confirm our assumption that "coal" is the subject of THAT clause?


That method works for determining what the underlined portion indicates in this case. However, if the non-underlined portion is in disagreement with what the underlined portion indicates, as it is to a degree in this case,then the sentence is in disagreement with itself, and therefore flawed. Once again, you have to determine whether the whole sentence works, rather than look at a little piece of it and attempt to apply some rule that you have heard about or come up with.

Rocking Sentence Correction is not a robotic, rules based activity. The question writers constantly come up with new twists. You have to make judgement calls on a case by case basis. Yes, some rules matter, but attempting to codify every little thing is not your best move.

You seem to have a good sense of what makes sense. To learn to rock SC, you could develop your skill in applying your sense of logic to answering SC questions.


I understand that the structure in A "there were substantial supplies..." is awkward and indirect. So this was the ONLY reason you chose it over E?

(E) is better than (A) because of what you just said, because "as" is a little better than "when", and because "supplies ... were exported" makes much more sense than does "supplies of coal that was exported". What does that last phrase even mean? Think about it. "There were supplies of coal that was exported." What??? So, the supplies are of exported coal only? It's a nonsensical string of words.
Responses in green above.
User avatar
teaserbae
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2022
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 191
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun
Can you please brief about and in the question I cannot relate the parallelism here
User avatar
abhishek31
Joined: 17 Sep 2017
Last visit: 12 Sep 2020
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Posts: 76
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Can anyone explain the flaws in option C ?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhishek31
Hi Can anyone explain the flaws in option C ?
Hi Abhishek, option C uses past perfect tense (had been).

Past perfect tense is used when two events happen one after the other, in which case, the earlier of the two events is expressed as past perfect.

In this sentence however, past perfect construct is not justified.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [2]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
teaserbae
MartyTargetTestPrep AjiteshArun
Can you please brief about and in the question I cannot relate the parallelism here
Sure. Firstly, the intended meaning of the sentence: coalfields opened in X in the 1820s, and as "connectivity" (canals and railroads) was established, lots of coal was sent from X (exported) to different places.

Now let's take a look at what the correct option gives us:

In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were exported to the nation’s A, B, C, and D.

The as canals and eventually railroads... bit is positioned well, as it is meant to modify the second clause (substantial supplies...), but you could move it to the end of the sentence if you want:

In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and substantial supplies of coal were exported to the nation’s A, B, C, and D as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region.
User avatar
teaserbae
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2022
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 191
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
I thought that won't be parallel since the first part of and contain verbed modifier opened so how's that parallel ?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
teaserbae
AjiteshArun
I thought that won't be parallel since the first part of and contain verbed modifier opened so how's that parallel ?
Let's take a look at all the -eds in the sentence:

In the 1820’s, anthracite coalfields opened in eastern Pennsylvania, and as canals and eventually railroads reached into the region, substantial supplies of coal were exported to the nation’s A, B, C, and D.

1. coalfields opened...
Opened is the verb for coalfields.

2. canals and railroads reached...
Reached is the verb for canals and railroads.

3. supplies were exported...
Were exported is the verb for supplies.

So in a quick example like the restaurant opened last night and invitations were sent to X, Y, and Z, the and joins two clauses.
User avatar
teaserbae
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Last visit: 07 Mar 2022
Posts: 191
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
Posts: 191
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
How can we differentiate whether -eds in the sentence is verb or verbed ?
I just check whether coalfields is the doer of the action opened so I considered opened verbed modifier.
I thought was opened will be appropriate to consider it as verb.
Same in the restaurant e.g the restaurant is not doing the action of opening so I would have made the mistake of considering it verbed
Please tell me how should I check whether ed is verb or modifier .
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
teaserbae
AjiteshArun
How can we differentiate whether -eds in the sentence is verb or verbed ?
I just check whether coalfields is the doer of the action opened so I considered opened verbed modifier.
I thought was opened will be appropriate to consider it as verb.
Same in the restaurant e.g the restaurant is not doing the action of opening so I would have made the mistake of considering it verbed
Please tell me how should I check whether ed is verb or modifier .
You're on the right track. It's just that we need to account for this (other) meaning (#1 under intransitive verb) of the verb open in this case. When open is used with an object, it could mean that thing was opened, was you pointed out. However, it can also be used without an object, in which case it just means that something like a company or institution started.

He opened a restaurant.
Opened is the verb for he.

A restaurant opened in our neighborhood.
It's possible to use opened this way as well.
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts