In the country of Marut, the Foreign Trade agency's records were reviewed in 1994 in light of information then newly available about neighboring Goro. The review revealed that in every year since 1963, the agency's projection of what Goro's gross national product (GNP) would be five years later was a serious underestimate. The review also revealed that in every year since 1963, the agency estimated Goro's GNP for the previous year—a Goro state secret—very accurately.Of the following claims, which is most strongly supported by the statements given ?(A) Goro's GNP fluctuated greatly between 1963 and 1994.
If GNP fluctuated greatly it would not be possible to guess the previous year's GNP
(B) Prior to 1995, Goro had not released data intended to mislead the agency in making its five-year projections.
It had actually released data in 1994, which is prior to 1995. Thank you GMAC easy elimination
(C) The amount by which the agency underestimated the GNP it projected for Goro tended to increase over time.
Harder to Eliminate, but, we can't really say from the passage that it actually increased over time, all we know from the passage is that the estimation was seriously lower than the actual but the trend is harder to capture
(D) Even before the new information came to light, the agency had reason to think that at least some of the five-year projections it had made were inaccurate.
Yes, this could be true, because they were able to guess the previous year's GNP accurately, they would be able to actually look at 5 year estimates and go - "Oh wait, the 5 year estimates in some of them could actually be wrong"
(E) The agency's five year projections of Goro's GNP had no impact on economic planning in Marut.
Thank you GMAC, No mention about economic planning in the passage.