Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 00:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1693
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 07:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes,
sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales
had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the
after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of following assumptions?

A. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes
did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.
B. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increase was due to a
smaller tax increase.
C. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year
before and the year after the tax increase.
D. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes
was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.
E. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Posts: 15
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 07:36
I think B is the answer. Because the author concludes that the volume of sales of cigarettes is related to the after tax price.For which he shows the evidence that the 10 % decrease in sales is due to 8 cent increase in tax and in previous year the sales had just decreased to 1 %. which means that he has assumed that the 1% decrease was due to the low increase in tax.
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 547
Location: Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 08:21
mh... I choose A

We must be sure that the pretax prices of the cigarettes remain the same, or are just slightly higher than those of the previous year, to have evidence that the reduced smoking is due to higher after-tax prices, and thus due to the tax increase.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2005
Posts: 328
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 10:43
I also pick A.
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 789
Location: BULGARIA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 11:13
Also think that it is B)
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 12:23
Its B.
_________________

...................................................................

Intern
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 21
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2006, 17:03
I picked B but I think it is A. Here is why -

B is not an anssumption, B solidifes the argument made above. Option A on the other end suggests that drop in sales is not due to increase in pre-tax price as it was last year.

No, I am confused. It is B
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2005
Posts: 90
Location: Minneapolis
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 18:57
1
KUDOS
I think it is D.
Lets create equations for before and after years
Before year >> x + y = z
After yesr >> a +b = c
x and a are pre tax figures, y and b are taxes and z and c are after tax figures.
We are interested in c-z = (a-x) + (b-y)
We know that b-y = 8 cents
So if c-z has to be positive, a-x > -8 or a > x-8
That means the a can not be 8 or more cents lower than x
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1693
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 19:43
The OA is "D".

Tougher CR again.
Good job Shailu, keep it up
(You quant looks good )
Intern
Joined: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 36
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2006, 13:51
Can anyone else provide an explanation for this? I'm not following shailu.
27 Feb 2006, 13:51
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Fact1: Over the past eight years , cuts in federal income 6 24 Aug 2010, 01:23
Following several years of declining advertising sales, the 0 18 Aug 2008, 18:24
In the two years following the unification of Germany in 9 15 May 2008, 18:35
Over the last 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase 17 27 Sep 2007, 09:38
A Book chain store s revenue increased by 10% in a year, one 6 11 Sep 2007, 08:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by