GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Nov 2018, 02:53

# GMAT Club Tests are Free and Open until midnight Nov 22, Pacific Time

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

November 24, 2018

November 24, 2018

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.
• ### GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz

November 24, 2018

November 24, 2018

09:00 AM PST

11:00 AM PST

We will start promptly at 09 AM Pacific Time. Quiz will last approximately 2 hours. Make sure you are on time or you will be at a disadvantage.

# Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1378
Location: Viet Nam
Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2017, 08:24
1
Question 1
00:00

based on 57 sessions

50% (03:19) correct 50% (03:00) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 58 sessions

93% (00:35) correct 7% (00:31) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 60 sessions

97% (00:39) correct 3% (00:53) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 56 sessions

39% (01:45) correct 61% (01:21) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

based on 55 sessions

58% (00:47) correct 42% (01:07) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

based on 56 sessions

81% (01:04) correct 19% (00:58) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

based on 50 sessions

68% (00:58) correct 32% (01:15) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 8
00:00

based on 50 sessions

58% (01:10) correct 42% (01:06) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the Old World for the staggering disparity between the indigenous population of America in 1492—new estimates of which soar as high as 100 million, or approximately one-sixth of the human race at that time—and the few million full-blooded Native Americans alive at the end of the nineteenth century. There is no doubt that chronic disease was an important factor in the precipitous decline, and it is highly probable that the greatest killer was epidemic disease, especially as manifested in virgin-soil epidemics.

Virgin-soil epidemics are those in which the populations at risk have had no previous contact with the diseases that strike them and are therefore immunologically almost defenseless. That virgin-soil epidemics were important in American history is strongly indicated by evidence that a number of dangerous maladies—smallpox, measles, malaria, yellow fever, and undoubtedly several more—were unknown in the pre-Columbian New World. The effects of their sudden introduction are demonstrated in the early chronicles of America, which contain reports of horrendous epidemics and steep population declines, confirmed in many cases by recent quantitative analyses of Spanish tribute records and other sources. The evidence provided by the documents of British and French colonies is not as definitive because the conquerors of those areas did not establish permanent settlements and begin to keep continuous records until the seventeenth century, by which time the worst epidemics had probably already taken place. Furthermore, the British tended to drive the native populations away, rather than enslaving them as the Spaniards did, so that the epidemics of British America occurred beyond the range of colonists’ direct observation.

Even so, the surviving records of North America do contain references to deadly epidemics among the indigenous population. In 1616-1619 an epidemic, possibly of bubonic or pneumonic plague, swept coastal New England, killing as many as nine out of ten. During the 1630’s smallpox, the disease most fatal to the Native American people, eliminated half the population of the Huron and Iroquois confederations. In the 1820’s fever devastated the people of the Columbia River area, killing eight out of ten of them.

Unfortunately, the documentation of these and other epidemics is slight and frequently unreliable, and it is necessary to supplement what little we do know with evidence from recent epidemics among Native Americans. For example, in 1952 an outbreak of measles among the Native American inhabitants of Ungava Bay, Quebec, affected 99 percent of the population and killed 7 percent, even though some had the benefit of modern medicine. Cases such as this demonstrate that even diseases that are not normally fatal can have devastating consequences when they strike an immunologically defenseless community.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) refute a common misconception
(B) provide support for a hypothesis
(C) analyze an argument
(D) suggest a solution to a dilemma
(E) reconcile opposing viewpoints

2. According to the passage, virgin-soil epidemics can be distinguished from other catastrophic outbreaks of disease in that virgin-soil epidemics
(A) recur more frequently than other chronic diseases
(B) affect a minimum of one-half of a given population
(C) involve populations with no prior exposure to a disease
(D) usually involve a number of interacting diseases
(E) are less responsive to medical treatment than are other diseases

3. According to the passage, the British colonists were unlike the Spanish colonists in that the British colonists

(A) collected tribute from the native population
(B) kept records from a very early date
(C) drove Native Americans off the land
(D) were unable to provide medical care against epidemic disease
(E) enslaved the native populations in America

4. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage concerning Spanish tribute records?

(A) They mention only epidemics of smallpox.
(B) They were instituted in 1492.
(C) They were being kept prior to the seventeenth century.
(D) They provide quantitative and qualitative evidence about Native American populations.
(E) They prove that certain diseases were unknown in the pre-Columbian New World.

5. The author implies which of the following about measles?

(A) It is not usually a fatal disease.
(B) It ceased to be a problem by the seventeenth century.
(C) It is the disease most commonly involved in virgin-soil epidemics.
(D) It was not a significant problem in Spanish colonies.
(E) It affects only those who are immunologically defenseless against it.

6. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the Native American inhabitants of Ungava Bay?

(A) They were almost all killed by the 1952 epidemic.
(B) They were immunologically defenseless against measles.
(C) They were the last native people to be struck by a virgin-soil epidemic.
(D) They did not come into frequent contact with white Americans until the twentieth century.
(E) They had been inoculated against measles.

7. The author mentions the 1952 measles outbreak most probably in order to

(A) demonstrate the impact of modern medicine on epidemic disease
(B) corroborate the documentary evidence of epidemic disease in colonial America
(C) refute allegations of unreliability made against the historical record of colonial America
(D) advocate new research into the continuing problem of epidemic disease
(E) challenge assumptions about how the statistical evidence of epidemics should be interpreted

8. Which of the following, if newly discovered, would most seriously weaken the author’s argument concerning the importance of virgin-soil epidemics in the depopulation of Native Americans?

(A) Evidence setting the pre-Columbian population of the New World at only 80 million
(B) Spanish tribute records showing periodic population fluctuations
(C) Documents detailing sophisticated Native American medical procedures
(D) Fossils indicating Native American contact with smallpox prior to 1492
(E) Remains of French settlements dating back to the sixteenth century

_________________
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2015
Posts: 80
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Re: Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2017, 03:37
Can anyone please explain the answers for question 1 and question 8 ??
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 33
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V45
Re: Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2017, 04:03
1
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) refute a common misconception
(B) provide support for a hypothesis
(C) analyze an argument
(D) suggest a solution to a dilemma
(E) reconcile opposing viewpoints

Often, for main idea questions it is possible to just skim just the intro and conclusion paragraphs to get the main idea. The passage begins by positing a theory that "historians are blaming diseases imported from the Old World for the staggering disparity between the indigenous population of America in 1492... and the few million full-blooded Native Americans alive at the end of the nineteenth century," that the author agrees with in the second sentence by stating that "there is no doubt that chronic disease was an important factor in the precipitous decline". The passage then concludes with further evidence even going beyond the initial timeframe by citing that "in 1952 an outbreak of measles among the Native American inhabitants of Ungava Bay, Quebec, affected 99 percent of the population and killed 7 percent, even though some had the benefit of modern medicine". From this information, it can be predicted that the reason the author wrote this passage was to provide additional support for a new theory.

Choice A is a reversal, since the author agrees with the historians. Choice B is an accurate paraphrase. Choice C is only half right, because the author does not only analyze the position, he adds to it. Choice D is incorrect because no solution is offered to the decline in the Native American population. Choice E is a reversal, since the author and the historians agree on the idea that disease dramatically impacted the Native American population. The correct choice for question 1 is B.

8. Which of the following, if newly discovered, would most seriously weaken the author’s argument concerning the importance of virgin-soil epidemics in the depopulation of Native Americans?

(A) Evidence setting the pre-Columbian population of the New World at only 80 million
(B) Spanish tribute records showing periodic population fluctuations
(C) Documents detailing sophisticated Native American medical procedures
(D) Fossils indicating Native American contact with smallpox prior to 1492
(E) Remains of French settlements dating back to the sixteenth century

To answer specific detail questions, first determine what the passage said about the topic. In the second paragraph the author writes, "virgin-soil epidemics are those in which the populations at risk have had no previous contact with the diseases that strike them and are therefore immunologically almost defenseless. That virgin-soil epidemics were important in American history is strongly indicated by evidence that a number of dangerous maladies—smallpox, measles, malaria, yellow fever, and undoubtedly several more—were unknown in the pre-Columbian New World". To weaken this argument based on the information in the passage alone, an answer must show that the evidence does not support the conclusion that virgin-soil epidemics were integral in the depopulation of Native Americans.

The actual population number to start has no impact on the scale of the population loss, so eliminate choice A as an irrelevant variable. Choice B refers to unknown "population fluctuations", so eliminate choice B for being vague. Sophisticated medical procedures need not be successful in fighting the virgin-soil diseases, so eliminate choice C as an irrelevant variable. If fossils indicate smallpox prior to 1492, then one of the main mortal disease was not by definition a "virgin-soil epidemic" as defined by the passage. This weakens the author's argument, so keep choice D. Finally, French settlements would have no impact on the likelihood that virgin-soil epidemics devastated the Native American population. The correct answer for question 8 is choice D.

Hope this helps on these two questions, and please let me know if you have questions on any of the others!
_________________

M.S. Journalism, Northwestern University '09
Director of Online Tutoring, MyGuru
http://www.myguruedge.com

Find out more about online GMAT tutoring with MyGuru
http://www.myguruedge.com/gmat-prep/online-gmat-tutoring

Re: Increasingly, historians are blaming diseases imported from the &nbs [#permalink] 16 Oct 2017, 04:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by