Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 07:34 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 07:34

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35488 [3]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35488 [2]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Posts: 317
Own Kudos [?]: 279 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q50 V22
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V28 (Online)
GPA: 4
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31918 [0]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
Expert Reply
sambitspm wrote:
Hi generis, I think the sentence should be underlined as follows. Also, the option A should be changed.

Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.


A) acquiredat least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times
in the space of is wordy. We can easily use within.. its refer to concious and hence we can use its instead of their.- CONTENDER.

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded
definitions are already acquired and not would

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded
Seems like a correct Option. Changing from A to C as IMO.

D) acquired at least five [color=#ed1c24]differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade[/color]
differing from what? NO

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading
ambiguity not fading?? In the past 5 definitions, the ambiguity has either faded or not faded. Fading is present continuous tense.


You are correct on the underlined part, and the same is edited.

However, A is not a contender and can be easily eliminated for using past perfect 'had'.
The sentence clearly talks of the ongoing ambiguity, so 'has' is correct.

C corrects the verb error and also makes it more concise by discarding ' in more recent times'.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2015
Posts: 201
Own Kudos [?]: 185 [1]
Given Kudos: 140
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.

POE:
Stop sign: 'had', we not using double past here. Eliminate (A) & (B).
(C) seems good; hold it.
Eliminate (D) - 'differing is a verb'
Eliminate (E) - change of meaning
CORRECT (C)


A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded - CORRECT

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Posts: 317
Own Kudos [?]: 279 [0]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GMAT 1: 600 Q50 V22
GMAT 2: 670 Q50 V28 (Online)
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
chetan2u wrote:
sambitspm wrote:
Hi generis, I think the sentence should be underlined as follows. Also, the option A should be changed.

Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.


A) acquiredat least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times
in the space of is wordy. We can easily use within.. its refer to concious and hence we can use its instead of their.- CONTENDER.

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded
definitions are already acquired and not would

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded
Seems like a correct Option. Changing from A to C as IMO.

D) acquired at least five [color=#ed1c24]differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade[/color]
differing from what? NO

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading
ambiguity not fading?? In the past 5 definitions, the ambiguity has either faded or not faded. Fading is present continuous tense.


You are correct on the underlined part, and the same is edited.

However, A is not a contender and can be easily eliminated for using past perfect 'had'.
The sentence clearly talks of the ongoing ambiguity, so 'has' is correct.

C corrects the verb error and also makes it more concise by discarding ' in more recent times'.


Thanks for pointing that out. I stopped reading the statement on space itself and missed the second part.
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 24 May 2019
Status:Civil Enginner
Posts: 315
Own Kudos [?]: 344 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Turkey
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.65
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.


A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times // the use of past perfect tense is not warranted. The perfect tense sounds much better here. i.e. its ambiguity has not faded in more recent times p.s. in the space of time is correct.

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded // "would" is not required here. There is no hypothetical situation.

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded // a perfect option in line with the analysis.

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade // different is the proper adjective here. The perfect tense, rather than the simple past tense, sounds much better here. "their" does not refer to any noun logically and should be replaced with "its", which suits properly. i.e. its ambiguity has not faded

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading // the absolute phrase, its ambiguity not fading, is very short and does not convey the proper meaning. it is much better to emphasize the perfect tense here, as in option C.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Posts: 164
Own Kudos [?]: 109 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Location: Saudi Arabia
GPA: 3.8
WE:Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.

* Subject Verb Agreement

[ "the term - acquired" ; "its ambiguity - had not faded"]
-All pair agree with subject verb agreement .

* Tense Form

[Past Tense]
- Past tense used that conveys the intended meaning but usage of " had" totally changed the meaning and makes redundant. Incorrect

* If-then condition

- not used

* Subjunctive Verb

- not used

* Pronoun

[ "its" has the antecedent " term"]
- the pronoun has proper antecedent.

* Modifier

[ "Introduced in 1678" properly modifies "the term "conscious" ]
- properly modifies the terms

* Parallelism

[ "and"]
-parallelism marker connected two sentence. seems okay

* Comparison

- not used

* Idioms

- not used

While analyzing the sentence , only tense form error identified.

A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times

- usage of "had" makes sentence logically incorrect

-Incorrect

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded

1. "would" pertains to uncertainty which not requires in this sentence
2. usage of "of which" is in appropriately.
3. usage of "had" is incorrect.

- Incorrect


C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded

- usage of "has" conveys intended meaning.

- Correct

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade

- pronoun error ; "their" is inappropriate.

-Incorrect

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading

- Subject verb agreement error; "its " not have any verb

- Incorrect


IMO(C)
Current Student
Joined: 05 Oct 2019
Posts: 100
Own Kudos [?]: 28 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V38
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V44 (Online)
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
1
Kudos
generis wrote:

Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)


For SC butler Questions Click Here



Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.


A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading



The question is trying to test the concept of tenses. The term acquired is perfect, because the definitions have already been acquired in the past. So we start off by eliminating B.

On to the next split - ambiguity had not faded versus ambiguity has not faded versus ambiguity did not fade - we go with AMBIGUITY HAS NOT FADED since the current situation is that the definition is still vague and ambiguous. Accordingly C is the best choice.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Apr 2020
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 42
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.

ANALYSIS: The problem in the underlined portion is that of Tenses. Introduced is the verb-ed modifier modifying 'the term'. So we will look at: acquired- simple past. The Sentence in the second clause: ambiguity had not faded uses past perfect tense but mentions the word 'recent times'. The is incorrect and present perfect is suited here.

A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times Rejected for reasons mentioned above

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded reject: same reason as for A)

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded Use of present perfect correctly represents that the event happened in the past and its effect continues in the present.

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade introduces new subject verb number error.

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading
Stern School Moderator
Joined: 26 May 2020
Status:Spirited
Posts: 634
Own Kudos [?]: 539 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
1
Kudos
generis wrote:
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.


A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading


Ans C , imo

Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.


A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times
-- use of past perfect tense is at issue . ambiguity is still present . so present perfect will be correct ..

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded
-- "would" is creating a meaning issue .. There is no hypothetical / subjunctive / prediction here .

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded
-- correct

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade
-- tense error.. differing is not correct .. pronoun their is prob as well /..
E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading
-- no verb .. out
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2019
Posts: 474
Own Kudos [?]: 342 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.

A) acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times
- ''...had not faded'' is in the past perfect tense, whereas the intended meaning is to attribute the action/event of fading to the present moment.

B) would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded
- "Introduced....would'' contradict each other in the timeline sense: "Introduced" highlights a past event, whereas ''would'' is used to describe an event that is expected to occur in the future.

C) acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded - has no error. Hence, (C) is the right answer choice.

D) acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade
- the singular subject ''the term'' cannot take the plural pronoun ''their''.

E) acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading
- the present progressive verb tense ''fading'' does not match the overall tense of the passage: the sentence implies that
(i) the term ''conscious'' had been introduced in 1678 - (an event of the past)
(ii) this term acquired 5 different definitions within 50 years - (an other event of the past)
(iii) the ambiguity introduced by the term still exists - (a situation that is still present and hence must be described in the present tense).

Hence, the present progressive tense ''fading'' does not fit in this passage.
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 5330
Own Kudos [?]: 35488 [0]
Given Kudos: 9464
Send PM
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The official explanation is here.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differ [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne