OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONTHE PROMPTQuote:
Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions in the space of 50 years, and its ambiguity had not faded in more recent times.
•
had not faded (past perfect) is the wrong verb tense
• when a sentence describes two completed actions in the past, the past perfect (
had not faded) is used to refer to the action that came first (earlier in time).
In this case, the action in question (fading) must have come second, a fact that is indicated by the phrase
in more recent timesEliminate A
Quote:
B) Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" would acquire at least five different definitions within 50 years, of which the ambiguity had not faded.
•
would acquire is weird. ("Would acquire" can be used as past tense of
will, but that situation is not at hand.)
The term
acquired, simple past tense, makes sense.
•
of which must refer to the noun that immediately precedes it (50 years), and it does not make sense to say that ambiguity of 50 years has not faded.
• the ambiguity of the term "conscious" has not faded (again, the ambiguity of "50 years" is nonsensical and cannot have faded)
Eliminate B
Quote:
C) Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five different definitions within 50 years, and its ambiguity has not faded.
• the use of simple past tense
acquired correctly refers to the first action (the term's acquisition of at least five definitions). That first action is rooted firmly in the past
• the use of the present perfect tense (
has not faded) to refer to second action (not fading) is also logical, indicating that the action is continuing into the present
KEEP
Quote:
D) Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired at least five differing definitions within 50 years, and their ambiguity did not fade.
• the plural pronoun
their does not agree with its singular antecedent
term• the only plural noun is
50 years, and logically, the pronoun
their cannot refer to that noun
Eliminate D
Quote:
E) Introduced in 1678, the term "conscious" acquired within 50 years at least five separate definitions, its ambiguity not fading.
•
its ambiguity not fading should be
and its ambiguity has not faded • the gerund (not fading) is awkward and less precise than the present perfect in option C
Eliminate E
The best answer is CCOMMENTSmanikmehta95 and
popcornninja (great username
) , welcome to SC Butler.
As always, I am glad to see all of you.
Well, when an expert gives you the answer before the OA—a practice not in keeping with the spirit of my Butler threads—I am likely to read accurate answers.
Still, you all have done well to put your own spin on analysis.
Here and there, we have a few errors that I have tried to correct in my POE above.
Kudos to all.