Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:00 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,298
 [17]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,298
 [17]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Deepakjhamb
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 218
Own Kudos:
135
 [2]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GPA: 3.96
WE:Business Development (Telecommunications)
Posts: 218
Kudos: 135
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sumi1010
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Jan 2025
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Posts: 300
Kudos: 696
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
TarunKumar1234
Joined: 14 Jul 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2024
Posts: 1,107
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 351
Location: India
Posts: 1,107
Kudos: 1,348
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: If customers want to ensure that their shampoo maximizes the health of their hair, they should use Maxxus.

Premises : 1) For normal moisture hair, Maxxus cleans like any other product in the market, 2) for dry hair, Maxxus restores moisture better than any products. It looks like 2nd point is an USP (Unique selling point).

Weaken: Like any other shampoo, Maxxus shampoo is less effective on dry hair than on hair of normal moisture. (It is undermining the USP of Maxxus, which will make the spokesperson claim incorrect.)

Strengthen: Maxxus shampoo is one of the best shampoos for people with particularly oily hair. (I think, it will add further to Spokesperson claim of the best product)
User avatar
rocky620
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 2018
Last visit: 11 May 2023
Posts: 501
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
WE:Other (Retail: E-commerce)
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V22
Posts: 501
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise: Maxxus is adequate for cleaning hair with normal moisture level, like other brands.
Premise: Maxxus is better for cleaning dry hair than do other competitor brands.

Conclusion:- If customers want to ensure that their shampoo maximizes the health of their hair, they should use Maxxus.

We need to identify the proportion of customers with different hair types / cost effectiveness to arrive at Strengthening or Weakening.

Maxxus shampoo is the market leader for men over the age of 35......We are narrowing the customers range. How about the female customers. Men and women both can equally desire a good hair health.

Maxxus shampoo is one of the best shampoos for people with particularly oily hair.....Strengthen. We already have positive premises for two hair type. This stem is giving another positive feedback for a different hair type.

Like any other shampoo, Maxxus shampoo is less effective on dry hair than on hair of normal moisture.....It is just a re wording of premises

A chemical component unique to Maxxus shampoo reacts with dyed hair in such a way as to increase the risk of breakage and split ends.....This can be both, depending on the the proportion of people who dye their hair. If Low then strengthen, If high then weaken

Maxxus shampoo is a premium product sold only at hair salons......Weakening. Firstly that the product is premium. Secondly the availability is limited. So there are Cost factors as well as convenience(in) factors, which indicates that it is a weakener.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,298
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello

This is a hard question, OA is posted it is:

Strengthen: Maxxus shampoo is one of the best shampoos for people with particularly oily hair.
Weaken: A chemical component unique to Maxxus shampoo reacts with dyed hair in such a way as to increase the risk of breakage and split ends.

Nice catch by Deepakjhamb

Official explanation will be posted soon.

Thank you
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,298
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,298
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

The question asks you to both strengthen and weaken the spokesperson’s conclusion. Treat this problem as a Critical Reasoning Strengthen and Weaken: deconstruct the argument, try to spot the assumptions, and then find a statement that makes the argument a little more likely to be valid (to strengthen) and one that makes it a little less likely to be valid (to weaken).

According to the spokesperson, Maxxus has a particular advantage when a person’s hair is dry: it is better able to restore moisture to hair than are the shampoos of major competitors. The spokesperson then concludes that using Maxxus will help to maximize the health of the customer’s hair.

Is restoring moisture the same thing as maximizing overall health? The spokesperson assumes so, but the argument provides evidence only about restoring moisture. It would strengthen the argument to provide any other information about how Maxxus helps hair health. On the flip side, it would weaken the argument to provide any information about how Maxxus might hurt hair health.

(A) Whether men of a certain age prefer Maxxus does not address hair health, specifically. These men might prefer Maxxus for the cost or the smell or some other attribute that does not have to do with hair health.

(B) Strengthen. If Maxxus shampoo is particularly good for people with oily hair, too, then Maxxus has another “healthy hair” advantage. This strengthens the idea that Maxxus is good for overall hair health, as it works for people with normal moisture levels and is particularly good for people with dry hair or oily hair.

(C) This choice appears to Weaken the argument, but it’s a trap. Even if Maxxus is not as good on dry hair as it is on normal hair, the argument already establishes that Maxxus is one of the best shampoos for dry hair. In other words, it is still better than the major competitors. This choice doesn’t weaken the argument after all.

(D) Weaken. This choice introduces a negative effect for a particular type of hair: Maxxus is more likely to cause dyed hair to break or split. This choice makes it less likely, then, that Maxxus will maximize the overall health of any type of hair, as the spokesperson claims.

(E) Where the product is sold does not address hair health. There are many reasons a salon might sell a particular brand of shampoo, not all of which have to do with hair health.

Column 1: The correct answer is (B).
Column 2: The correct answer is (D).
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 534
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,193
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 534
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyMurray IanStewart

I had selected option E for strengthen but later realised my mistake and wanted to confirm my reasoning.

Is option E wrong because we have to make our own assumption that products sold at premium hair salons are effective? This assumption isn't be supported by the argument.

Please let me know if this is the correct reasoning.
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
256
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 271
Kudos: 256
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, thats the main part of it. The product being premium and only sold at salons doesn't directly support that it's the best shampoo. Rather, its an inference that may or not be correct in this context.
agrasan
Hi MartyMurray IanStewart

I had selected option E for strengthen but later realised my mistake and wanted to confirm my reasoning.

Is option E wrong because we have to make our own assumption that products sold at premium hair salons are effective? This assumption isn't be supported by the argument.

Please let me know if this is the correct reasoning.
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agrasan
IanStewart

I had selected option E for strengthen but later realised my mistake and wanted to confirm my reasoning.

We have no idea what criteria salons use to choose which shampoo to sell, so the mention of salons in answer E doesn't help much. I suppose if you interpret "premium" (which the question doesn't define) to mean "high quality", then E helps a bit, but if you take it to mean "high priced", that doesn't tell us anything. The word can have either connotation (or both), so we're left to guess how helpful E is.

I'm not sure what answer is best here, because the "right" answer is obviously flawed. The conclusion is that Maxxus "maximizes" hair health. The ostensibly correct strengthener says Maxxus "is one of the best shampoos for people with particularly oily hair." In other words, Maxxus is not the best shampoo for oily hair, only "one of the best". But the conclusion is that Maxxus "maximizes" hair health -- that is, the conclusion is that Maxxus is the absolute best shampoo. When the "right" answer tells us Maxxus is not the best shampoo, that is a weakener to my view, not a strengthener.

Does anyone know the source of the problem? I don't see it listed anywhere.