Last visit was: 14 May 2024, 21:21 It is currently 14 May 2024, 21:21

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10155
Own Kudos [?]: 16681 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 258
Own Kudos [?]: 307 [0]
Given Kudos: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GPA: 3.73
WE:Design (Real Estate)
Send PM
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 10155
Own Kudos [?]: 16681 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 435
Own Kudos [?]: 443 [0]
Given Kudos: 752
Location: Malaysia
GPA: 3.95
WE:Consulting (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) n - 1 < 0 (2) |3 - n| > |n + 5| [#permalink]
MathRevolution wrote:
[GMAT math practice question]

Is \(n<0\)?

\(1) n-1<0\)
\(2) |3-n| > |n+5|\)


Statement I:

Take \(n = 0, n = \frac{1}{2}\)... So, Insufficient.

Statement II:

From the equation, LHS > RHS.... This is only possible when n is -ve. So, sufficient.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 935
Own Kudos [?]: 1544 [3]
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) n - 1 < 0 (2) |3 - n| > |n + 5| [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
MathRevolution wrote:
[GMAT math practice question]

Is \(n<0\)?

\(1) n-1<0\)
\(2) |3-n| > |n+5|\)


This is a different approach to statement 2:

Statement 2: |3-n| really just means 'the distance between 3 and n on a number line'.

For example, if n = 2, then |3-n| = |3-2| = |1| = 1. The distance between 3 and 2 on a number line is 1.

If n = 10, then |3-n| = |3-10| = |-7| = 7. And likewise, the distance between 3 and 10 on a number line is 7.

This is just a fact about absolute values of differences.

Similarly, |n + 5| can be read as |n - (-5)|. That makes it the absolute value of a difference. So, you can read this one as 'the distance between n and -5 on a number line'.

That means you can fully translate statement 2 like this:

The distance between n and 3 on a number line, is greater than the distance between n and -5 on a number line.

Or in other words,

n is closer to -5 than it is to 3.

What does that tell you about n? In other words, which numbers are closer to -5 than to 3? Jot down a number line on your paper and start figuring it out.



The numbers to the right of 3 will all be closer to 3, so those don't work:



Now look at the numbers in between -5 and 3:



All of the ones that are closer to -5, are negative numbers.

We can conclude that if a number is closer to -5 than it is to 3, it's definitely got to be a negative number.

That makes statement 2 sufficient.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) n - 1 < 0 (2) |3 - n| > |n + 5| [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
93261 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne