Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:31 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jimmyjamesdonkey
Joined: 01 May 2007
Last visit: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 484
Own Kudos:
1,539
 [42]
Posts: 484
Kudos: 1,539
 [42]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
40
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
gmatnub
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Last visit: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 393
Own Kudos:
1,657
 [7]
Posts: 393
Kudos: 1,657
 [7]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EgmatQuantExpert
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Last visit: 02 Apr 2024
Posts: 3,663
Own Kudos:
20,166
 [5]
Given Kudos: 165
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,663
Kudos: 20,166
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
prasannar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Last visit: 23 Aug 2012
Posts: 352
Own Kudos:
4,006
 [1]
Posts: 352
Kudos: 4,006
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A

you atleast have one integer divisible by 3 for every 3 consecutive numbers, the question says 4 consecutive numbers thus A

Stmt-2 does not provide any info thus insufficient
avatar
metskj127
Joined: 14 Mar 2015
Last visit: 11 Apr 2017
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jimmyjamesdonkey
Is the integer r divisible by 3?

(1) r is the product of 4 consecutive integers.
(2) r < 25


For Statement 1, why couldn't the 4 integers by 0, 1, 2, 3? In which case, r=0.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,784
Own Kudos:
12,807
 [3]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,784
Kudos: 12,807
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi metskj127,

The GMAT will sometimes test you on concepts that you know, but in ways that you're not used to thinking about (as is the case here).

This specific concept can appear in other ways. When most people think of "multiples", they only think of POSITIVE multiples.

eg. Multiples of 10: 10, 20, 30, 40, etc.

But 10x0 is ALSO a multiple of 10, so the above list should INCLUDE the number 0. Don't be surprised if this exact issue shows up in one of your DS questions on Test Day...

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
anairamitch1804
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
Posts: 506
Kudos: 3,564
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
a) r is the product of 4 consecutive positive integers.

Multiples of 3 are 3,6,9,12...
any set of 4 positive integers will have a multiple of 3.

say 1,2,3,4 has 3
8,9,10,11 has 9(a multiple of 3)

Hence a) alone is sufficient

b) r < 25
It doesn't matter if r is less than 25 or not.


Hence A is the correct choice
avatar
marvinsxntos
Joined: 06 Jan 2021
Last visit: 18 Mar 2021
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not exactly sure about my approach, but how about:

(1) four consecutive integers -> 2 odd integers & 2 even integers -> product and therefore r is even -> r can't be devisible by 3 since it's even -> SUFFICIENT
avatar
Zhenya0258
Joined: 06 May 2021
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 640 Q41 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.94
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
Posts: 22
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
marvinsxntos But 12 is even and is divisible by 3.
24 is even and divisible by 3.

marvinsxntos
Not exactly sure about my approach, but how about:

(1) four consecutive integers -> 2 odd integers & 2 even integers -> product and therefore r is even -> r can't be devisible by 3 since it's even -> SUFFICIENT
avatar
GMATJudoka
Joined: 15 Mar 2021
Last visit: 09 Aug 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 16
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.98
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone help out here, please? I keep seeing Answer A is sufficient, but I'm not getting that in my execution of the problem:




Q: Is "R" divisible by 3?

1) (1) r is the product of 4 consecutive integers.

Ex. 1: 0, 1, 2, 3; Product is 0; suff.

Ex. 2: 1, 2, 3, 4; Product is 24; suff.

Ex. 3: -2, -1, 0, 1; Product is 2; insuff.

Cancel Answers "A"/"D".

2) r < 25

Ex. 2 and Ex. 3 above fit this criterion, therefore insuff.

Cancel Answer "B".

3) Together, both provide a product less than 25, abiding by consecutive integers, with a result of "maybe", therefore "insufficient" together.

ANSWER E is correct
avatar
Zhenya0258
Joined: 06 May 2021
Last visit: 10 Nov 2021
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 640 Q41 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.94
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V39
Posts: 22
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In your example 3, the correct product is zero (-2*-1*1*0) since anything times zero is zero. Therefore since zero is divisible by 3, example 3 is sufficient as well.
GMATJudoka

GMATJudoka
Can someone help out here, please? I keep seeing Answer A is sufficient, but I'm not getting that in my execution of the problem:




Q: Is "R" divisible by 3?

1) (1) r is the product of 4 consecutive integers.

Ex. 1: 0, 1, 2, 3; Product is 0; suff.

Ex. 2: 1, 2, 3, 4; Product is 24; suff.

Ex. 3: -2, -1, 0, 1; Product is 2; insuff.

Cancel Answers "A"/"D".

2) r < 25

Ex. 2 and Ex. 3 above fit this criterion, therefore insuff.

Cancel Answer "B".

3) Together, both provide a product less than 25, abiding by consecutive integers, with a result of "maybe", therefore "insufficient" together.

ANSWER E is correct

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,989
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATJudoka

Ex. 3: -2, -1, 0, 1; Product is 2; insuff.

The product here is 0, not 2, so that's why your calculations led you to an incorrect answer.

In general, the product of n consecutive integers is always divisible by n!, so here, the product of our 4 consecutive integers is automatically divisible by 4! = 24, and in particular is divisible by 3, so Statement 1 is sufficient. There is no reason to consider zero separately.

There are two posts above that carry an 'Expert' tag that might be misleading, so to clarify:

- one post says "zero is divisible by any integer", which is definitely true if you rephrase it to say "zero is divisible by any positive integer", but is only true, as written, if you use a definition of divisibility that is not universally accepted: by some definitions, zero is divisible by zero, and by some definitions, zero is not divisible by zero. For GMAT purposes, it's best just to think: "you can never divide by zero, so nothing is divisible by zero", though that's not an issue you'll really ever need to worry about regardless.

- another post says "don't be surprised if this exact issue shows up... on test day." I'm not even sure what that means, but there is no reason whatsoever to be concerned about "issues" around zero in divisibility questions of this type. For one thing, zero follows all of the divisibility rules followed by any other positive numbers - for example, the product of n consecutive integers is always divisible by n!, whether zero is allowed to be among those integers or not. Or as another example, "multiples of 7 are 7 apart" is still true when you include zero among your multiples of seven. So you're generally just wasting time if you consider zero as a separate case in questions like this. But there's another reason you should be especially surprised if this "exact issue shows up on test day": almost all GMAT divisibility questions are restricted to positive integers only. It's normally not even permitted for any of your numbers to be zero.

While there are many unrealistic prep company questions that test certain exceptions about zero, it is almost impossible to find any official questions that do. Prep materials that encourage test takers to spend time separating out zero as a special case in questions like the one in this thread are just using up a test taker's time during a test, time that could be spent more profitably on a different question.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,587
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,587
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts