GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Nov 2019, 23:12 ### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

#### Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.  # Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern  Joined: 12 Aug 2010
Posts: 13
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

4
29 00:00

Difficulty:   55% (hard)

Question Stats: 64% (01:44) correct 36% (01:42) wrong based on 938 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: http://gmatclub.com/forum/is-the-number ... 43694.html

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Statements 1 and 2 ALONE are surely not sufficient to answer the question.

However i think BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient

From Statement 1:

(d2 + 30)/r1

From Statement 2:

d1 / (r2 + 30)

From Statement 1 and 2:

(d2 + 30) / (r2 + 30)

Now if anyone has done Manhattan, refer Page 28 FDP which says, ''increasing BOTH the numerator and the denominator by THE SAME VALUE brings the fraction closer to 1."

It means it increases the original value, right.

So if i have to decide which is greater, (1) (d2 + 30) / (r2 + 30) or (2) d2 / r2, obviously it has to be (1).

OG explaination says Statement (1) and (2) TOGETHER are not sufficient.

What's yours view guys??
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59150
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

32
23
chiragatara wrote:
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Is $$\frac{d_1}{r_1}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$?

Obviously each statement alone is not sufficient.

When taken together we'l have: is $$\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$? --> cross multiply (we can safely do that as in both fractions denominator and nominator are positive): $$d_2*r_2+30r_2>d_2*r_2+30d_2$$ --> is $$r_2>d_2$$? so we have that $$\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$ holds true when $$r_2>d_2$$, but we don't know whether that's true so even taken together statements are not sufficient.

Generally if $$a$$, $$b$$ and $$c$$ are positive numbers and $$a>b$$ then $$\frac{a}{b}>\frac{a+c}{b+c}$$ (or as you mention $$\frac{a+c}{b+c}$$ is closer to 1 then $$\frac{a}{b}$$, but as $$\frac{a}{b}>1$$ then $$\frac{a+c}{b+c}$$ is getting less to be closer to 1). For example: $$\frac{3}{2}>\frac{3+30}{2+30}$$;

But if $$a$$, $$b$$ and $$c$$ are positive numbers and $$a<b$$ then $$\frac{a}{b}<\frac{a+c}{b+c}$$ (again $$\frac{a+c}{b+c}$$ is closer to 1 then $$\frac{a}{b}$$, but as $$\frac{a}{b}<1$$ then $$\frac{a+c}{b+c}$$ is getting bigger to be closer to 1). For example: $$\frac{4}{5}<\frac{4+30}{5+30}$$.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
##### General Discussion
Verbal Forum Moderator Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 351
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

excellent explanation by bunuel
_________________
My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Manager  Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 125
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Hi

For this question, r1, r2 are positive
r1>r2+30
so 1/r1<1/r2
Thus, d1/r1>d2/r2.

I am not quite sure what I did wrong here. Help!
Thank you.
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59150
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

1
thuydo246 wrote:
Hi

For this question, r1, r2 are positive
r1>r2+30
so 1/r1<1/r2
Thus, d1/r1>d2/r2.

I am not quite sure what I did wrong here. Help!
Thank you.

Your conclusion is not right. Also we have:

(1) $$d_1=d_2+30$$;
(2) $$r_1=r_2+30$$;

Not r1>r2+30 as you wrote.

Please, see my solution above (I've just merged the topics, so it's new there) and ask if anything remains unclear.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Manager  Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 125
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Oh thank you. I just created a brand new problem. Thanks for pointing this out.
Manager  Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 197
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Said
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V44 GPA: 2.9
WE: Marketing (Computer Software)
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

2
1
Bunuel wrote:
so we have that $$\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$ holds true when $$r_2>d_2$$, but we don't know whether that's true

This is the key property to remember. Thank you Bunuel! +1
_________________
If you like it, Kudo it!

"There is no alternative to hard work. If you don't do it now, you'll probably have to do it later. If you didn't need it now, you probably did it earlier. But there is no escaping it."

710 Debrief. Crash and Burn
Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59150
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

All DS Fractions/Ratios/Decimals questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=36
All PS Fractions/Ratios/Decimals questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=57

_________________
Intern  Joined: 22 May 2013
Posts: 43
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

2
Bunuel wrote:
Bumping for review and further discussion*. Get a kudos point for an alternative solution!

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE

All DS Fractions/Ratios/Decimals questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=36
All PS Fractions/Ratios/Decimals questions: search.php?search_id=tag&tag_id=57

Clearly either of the statements are not sufficient.

Lets look at (1) + (2) case

d1=30+d2
r1=r2+30
t1 = d1/r1 and t2=d2/r2
t1 = (30+d2)/(30+r1)

Lets consider two cases, lets take d2/r2 = 1/2 and 2/1

if t2=d2/r2 = 1/2

Then, t1 = 31/32 =0.9 something that is greater then 1/2 i.e. 0.5

if t2=d2/r2 = 2/1

Then, t1 = 32/31 =0.1 something that is less than 2/1 i.e. 2

Hence we cant say => Not sufficient

Ans: E
_________________
PS: Like my approach? Please Help me with some Kudos. Intern  Joined: 22 Nov 2015
Posts: 17
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

In this question I do have have a doubt could anyone help me and correct me if I'm wrong:
here Q: t1=d1/r1> t2=d2/r2

condtions : statement 1: d1=d2+30
statement 2: r1=r2+30

Individually insufficient, but why cant ans be C

plugging the values:

case1: d2=30 and r2=10==> d1=60 and r2=40==>t1=60/40=1.5 sec and t2=30/10=3sec==>1.5sec<3 sec SUFF

case 2: d2=20 and r2=5==> d1=50 and r2=35==>t1=20/5=4 sec and t2=50/35=1.4sec==>4 sec>1.4 sec SUFF

Because it gives ans yes/no

help
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor V
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8154
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42 GPA: 3.82
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

3
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

In the original condition, there are 4 variables(r1,d1,r2,d2), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 4 more equations. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make E the answer. In 1) & 2), d1/r1>d2/r2? becomes (30+d2)/(30+r2)>d2/r2?, which also develops into (30+d2)r2>(30+r2)d2?. From 30r2+d2r2>30d2+r2d2?, delete r2d2 in the both equations and they become 30r2>30d2?. So, you cannot get the answer from r2>d2?, which is not sufficient. Therefore, the answer is E.

-> For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9791
Location: Pune, India
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

3
1
chiragatara wrote:
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Responding to a pm:

The question is based on the concept discussed here:
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... round-one/

Question: Is $$\frac{d1}{r1} > \frac{d2}{r2}$$?

Each statement alone is not sufficient. Statement 1 doesn't give any data on rates and statement 2 doesn't give any data on distance.

Using both,
d1 = d2 + 30
r1 = r2 + 30

Question: Is $$\frac{d2+30}{r2+30} > \frac{d2}{r2}$$?

What is the number property related to adding same numbers to both numerator and denominator?

Say 3/4. Add 1 to both you get 4/5. Add 2 to both you get 5/6. It increases the fraction.

Say 5/4. Add 1 to both you get 6/5. Add 2 to both you get 7/6. It decreases the fraction.

So this depends on whether $$\frac{d2}{r2}$$ is less than 1 or greater than 1.

Hence until and unless we know the value of d1/r1, we cannot answer this question.

_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Math Expert V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59150
Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

chiragatara wrote:
Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: http://gmatclub.com/forum/is-the-number ... 43694.html

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Statements 1 and 2 ALONE are surely not sufficient to answer the question.

However i think BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient

From Statement 1:

(d2 + 30)/r1

From Statement 2:

d1 / (r2 + 30)

From Statement 1 and 2:

(d2 + 30) / (r2 + 30)

Now if anyone has done Manhattan, refer Page 28 FDP which says, ''increasing BOTH the numerator and the denominator by THE SAME VALUE brings the fraction closer to 1."

It means it increases the original value, right.

So if i have to decide which is greater, (1) (d2 + 30) / (r2 + 30) or (2) d2 / r2, obviously it has to be (1).

OG explaination says Statement (1) and (2) TOGETHER are not sufficient.

What's yours view guys??

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

We need to find whether $$\frac{d_1}{r_1}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$.

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 --> $$d_1=d_2+30$$. Nothing about the rates. Not sufficient.
(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2 --> $$r_1=r_2+30$$. Nothing about the distances. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) The question becomes whether $$\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$. Now, if $$d_2=r_2$$, then $$\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}=\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$, thus in this case the answer would be NO but if $$d_2=1$$ and $$r_2=2$$, then in this case $$\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}=\frac{31}{32}>\frac{1}{2}=\frac{d_2}{r_2}$$, thus in this case the answer would be YES. Not sufficient.

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: http://gmatclub.com/forum/is-the-number ... 43694.html
_________________ Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1   [#permalink] 06 Dec 2017, 02:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  