Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Dec 2012, 07:46

39

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:28) correct
42% (01:24) wrong based on 1365 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

We need to find whether \(\frac{d_1}{r_1}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}\).

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 --> \(d_1=d_2+30\). Nothing about the rates. Not sufficient. (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2 --> \(r_1=r_2+30\). Nothing about the distances. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) The question becomes whether \(\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}\). Now, if \(d_2=r_2\), then \(\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}=\frac{d_2}{r_2}\), thus in this case the answer would be NO but if \(d_2=1\) and \(r_2=2\), then in this case \(\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}=\frac{31}{32}>\frac{1}{2}=\frac{d_2}{r_2}\), thus in this case the answer would be YES. Not sufficient.

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Dec 2012, 06:35

4

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Walkabout wrote:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Hi,

St1 and st 2 alone are not sufficient so combining we get

IS

(d2+30)/(r2+30) > d2/r2

The asnwer to this Question will depend upon the ratio of d2/r2.

If d2/r2 is <1, then on adding the same + ve qty to Num & Den will increase the ratio value if d2/r2 is > 1 ,then on adding the same qty will decrease the ratio

Hence ans E
_________________

“If you can't fly then run, if you can't run then walk, if you can't walk then crawl, but whatever you do you have to keep moving forward.”

Distance and Speed - Question 90 from OG13 [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jan 2013, 10:20

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second? (1) d1 is 30 greater than d2. (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Now, when I solved this question, I was surprised to see that the solution was (E), i.e, none of the statements provide sufficient information.

I recall, however, that when you add the same number to both the numerator and denominator of a fraction, the resulting fraction is always closer to 1. Using that logic, statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER provide sufficient information. Am I approaching this wrong here?

Okay, figured it out. The information regarding which number is bigger (the speed or the distance) is not provided. Which means that the new fraction (r2 and d2) could actually be approaching 1 from either 0 or from infinity. Clever.

As with all DS: translating the given information is critical

So the real question is: D1/R1 > D2/R2?

(1) D1 = D2 + 30 You can substitute one of the variables. BUT R1 and R2 could be anything so you could answer yes by making R1 very tiny number and R2 a huge number or you could do the opposite and the answer would be no. Insufficient.

(2) R1 = R2+ 30 The same logic as a above for this statement

(1) + (2) If you put the statements together the question becomes: D2+30/R2+30 > D2/R2

You should test very big values and very small values to see what happens. If R2 is a very tiny value and D2 is a massive value then the left side will be smaller than the right side because R2 will be increased by a much greater factor than will D2.

D2 = 1000 --------> 1030/31 > 1000/1 NO R2 = 1

And vice-versa, if DS is a tiny value and R2 is a massive value than the left side will be greater because D2 will have a greater percentage increase than R2.

D2 = 1 ---------> 31/1030 > 1/1000 YES R2 = 1000

So, you are able to say Yes and No to the original question so the the answer is E

Let me know if you have any questions on this!

HG.
_________________

"It is a curious property of research activity that after the problem has been solved the solution seems obvious. This is true not only for those who have not previously been acquainted with the problem, but also for those who have worked over it for years." -Dr. Edwin Land

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second? (1) d1 is 30 greater than d2. (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Now, when I solved this question, I was surprised to see that the solution was (E), i.e, none of the statements provide sufficient information.

I recall, however, that when you add the same number to both the numerator and denominator of a fraction, the resulting fraction is always closer to 1. Using that logic, statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER provide sufficient information. Am I approaching this wrong here?

Okay, figured it out. The information regarding which number is bigger (the speed or the distance) is not provided. Which means that the new fraction (r2 and d2) could actually be approaching 1 from either 0 or from infinity. Clever.

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above and ask if anything remains unclear.
_________________

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet p [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 May 2013, 23:41

kapilnegi wrote:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

questions is t1 > t2? or (d1/r1) > (d2 / r2)? => (d2 + 30)/(r2 + 30) > (d2/r2)? => [[(d2+30)-(r2+30)]/(r2 + 30)] > (d2-r2)/r2 -- subtract 1 on both sides => [(d2-r2)/(r2+30)]>(d2-r2)/r2 => 1/(r2+30) > 1/(r2) => (r2+30) < r2 => 30 < 0 ? This questions IMO is not answerable but justified in OG . Any thoughts? Am I wrong?

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 May 2013, 01:29

3

This post received KUDOS

kapilnegi wrote:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

This problem depends on the following concept.

If a,b are two positive numbers. and k is any positive number

a. if a/b is greater than 1 then a+k/b+k is less than a/b b. if a/b is less than 1 then a+k/b+k is greater than a/b

Now consider the Above question

we have d1/r1 and d2/r2.

but d1 = d2 + 30 r1 = r2 + 30

so we have d2+30/r2 + 30 and d2/r2

but we don't know whether d2 is greater than r2. So together these statements are not sufficient
_________________

"Kudos" will help me a lot!!!!!!Please donate some!!!

Completed Official Quant Review OG - Quant

In Progress Official Verbal Review OG 13th ed MGMAT IR AWA Structure

Yet to do 100 700+ SC questions MR Verbal MR Quant

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

questions is t1 > t2? or (d1/r1) > (d2 / r2)? => (d2 + 30)/(r2 + 30) > (d2/r2)? => [[(d2+30)-(r2+30)]/(r2 + 30)] > (d2-r2)/r2 -- subtract 1 on both sides => [(d2-r2)/(r2+30)]>(d2-r2)/r2 => 1/(r2+30) > 1/(r2) => (r2+30) < r2 => 30 < 0 ? This questions IMO is not answerable but justified in OG . Any thoughts? Am I wrong?

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jul 2013, 15:50

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

Time = distance/rate

t1>t2?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2

We know nothing about the rate for r1 and r2. INSUFFICIENT

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

We know nothing about the distance of 1 an 2. Even if r1 is greater, the distance for 2 may be proportionally less so that even at a slower speed, d2 is covered in less time than d1. INSUFFICIENT

1+2)

Hypothetical A:

1: Distance = 31 feet and rate = 31 feet/second 2: Distance = 1 feet and rate = 1 foot/second

In this case the time it takes for both is the same.

Hypothetical B:

1: Distance = 330 feet and rate = 60 feet/second Time = Distance / Rate Time = 330 / 60 Time = 11/3 seconds

2: Distance = 300 feet and rate = 30 feet/second Time = Distance/Rate Time = 300 / 30 Time = 10 seconds

It's possible that the time to cover d1 is the same as d2. It also may be greater. INSUFFICIENT

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 09:58

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Mar 2015, 09:36

kiranck007 wrote:

kapilnegi wrote:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

questions is t1 > t2? or (d1/r1) > (d2 / r2)? => (d2 + 30)/(r2 + 30) > (d2/r2)? => [[(d2+30)-(r2+30)]/(r2 + 30)] > (d2-r2)/r2 -- subtract 1 on both sides => [(d2-r2)/(r2+30)]>(d2-r2)/r2 => 1/(r2+30) > 1/(r2) => (r2+30) < r2 => 30 < 0 ? This questions IMO is not answerable but justified in OG . Any thoughts? Am I wrong?

Can someone verify the above cited approach for this particular DS question?
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2.

(2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

questions is t1 > t2? or (d1/r1) > (d2 / r2)? => (d2 + 30)/(r2 + 30) > (d2/r2)? => [[(d2+30)-(r2+30)]/(r2 + 30)] > (d2-r2)/r2 -- subtract 1 on both sides => [(d2-r2)/(r2+30)]>(d2-r2)/r2 => 1/(r2+30) > 1/(r2) => (r2+30) < r2 => 30 < 0 ? This questions IMO is not answerable but justified in OG . Any thoughts? Am I wrong?

Can someone verify the above cited approach for this particular DS question?

hi samichange, this kind of approach is not required, it will just complicate the matters .. take each statement separately and then combined to see if they satisfy the answer... i think the approach was to show that the question is not justified as after simplifying it gives 30<0, which is not possible ... however the person has gone wrong after the colored portion... u just cant cancel d2-r2 from each side.. you have to get the entire thing on one side and take d2-r2 as common term outside..
_________________

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2015, 19:21

Bunuel wrote:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

We need to find whether \(\frac{d_1}{r_1}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}\).

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 --> \(d_1=d_2+30\). Nothing about the rates. Not sufficient. (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2 --> \(r_1=r_2+30\). Nothing about the distances. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) The question becomes whether \(\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}>\frac{d_2}{r_2}\). Now, if \(d_2=r_2\), then \(\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}=\frac{d_2}{r_2}\), thus in this case the answer would be NO but if \(d_2=1\) and \(r_2=2\), then in this case \(\frac{d_2+30}{r_2+30}=\frac{31}{32}>\frac{1}{2}=\frac{d_2}{r_2}\), thus in this case the answer would be YES. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hi Bunuel,

I got the correct answer. However, i just pondered over this and found the below. Can you help me find out where am i wrong over here?

Re: Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Nov 2015, 02:09

Walkabout wrote:

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

I would rather simplify this expression further to derive at the answer: \(\frac{d2+30}{r2+30} > \frac{d2}{r2}\) --> \(r2*d2+30*r2 > d2*r2 + 30*d2\), r2d2 cancel out and we have 30*r2 > 30*d2, if r2=d2 the answer is no, and if r2 > d2 the answer is yes, thus Answer (E)
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Apr 2016, 15:34

R1T1 =D1 AND R2T2 =D2 => THE QUESTION ASKS IF THE TIME FOR 1 IS FASTER THAN FOR 2. SO FORMULA ALONE YOU CAN SAY \(T1 = \frac{D1}{R1}\), \(T2 = \frac{D2}{R2}\)

STMT1 SAYS THAT D1> D2 AND IF I PUT THAT INTO THE FORMULA I AM NOT SURE WHAT THE Rs ARE FOR ME TO CONFIRM WHICH ONE IF GREATER. INSUFFICIENT.

STMT2 SAYS THAT R1>R2 AND SIMILAR TO STMT1 I DONT HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO CONFIRM.

COMBINING TOGETHER WE KNOW THAT D1>D2 AND R1>R2, AND OUR FORMULA OF \(\frac{D1}{R1} > \frac{D2}{R2}\) BUT WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT THESE VALUES DOES NOT HELP BECAUSE D1>D2 HELPS THE LEFT SIDE OF OUR EQUATION TO BE BIGGER WHILE R1>R2 HELPS THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE EQUATION TO BE BIGGER. WITHOUT KNOWING MORE NUMBERS I CANNOT SUFFICIENTLY. ANSWER E.

Is the number of seconds required to travel d1 feet at r1 feet per second greater than the number of seconds required to travel d2 feet at r2 feet per second?

(1) d1 is 30 greater than d2 (2) r1 is 30 greater than r2.

Solution:

We need to determine whether the number of seconds required to travel d_1 feet at r_1 feet per second is greater than the number of seconds required to travel d_2 feet at r_2 feet per second. We can set this question up in the form of an inequality. Remember that:

time = distance/rate

Thus, we can now ask:

Is d_1/r_1 > d_2/r_2 ?

When we cross multiply we obtain:

Is (d_1)(r_2) > (d_2)(r_1) ?

Statement One Alone:

d_1 is 30 greater than d_2.

From statement one, we can create the following equation:

d_1 = 30 + d_2

Since d_1 = 30 + d_2, we can substitute 30 + d_2 in for d_1 in the inequality (d_1)(r_2) > (d_2)(r_1):

Is (30 + d_2)(r_2) > (d_2)(r_1) ?

We see that we still cannot answer the question. Statement one alone is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choices A and D.

Statement Two Alone:

r_1 is 30 greater than r_2.

From statement two we can create the following equation:

r_1 = 30 + r_2

Since r_1 = 30 + r_2, we can substitute 30 + r_2 for r_1 in the inequality (d_1)(r_2) > (d_2)(r_1):

Is (d_1)(r_2) > (d_2)(30 + r_2) ?

We see that we still cannot answer the question. Statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question. We can eliminate answer choice B.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using the information from statements one and two we have the following equations:

1) d_1 = 30 + d_2

2) r_1 = 30 + r_2

Since d_1 = 30 + d_2 and since r_1 = 30 + r_2, we can substitute 30 + d_2 for d_1 and 30 + r_2 for r_1 in the inequality (d_1)(r_2) > (d_2)(r_1):

Is (30 + d_2)(r_2) > (d_2)(30 + r_2) ?

Is (30)(r_2) + (d_2)(r_2) > (30)(d_2) + (d_2)(r_2) ?

Is (30)(r_2) > (30)(d_2) ?

Is r_2 > d_2 ?

Since we cannot determine whether r_2 is greater than d_2, statements one and two together are not sufficient to answer the question.

The answer is E.
_________________

Jeffery Miller Head of GMAT Instruction

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course 500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...