Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 27 Mar 2017, 11:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is the scoring flawed?

Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 21:10
Hi I have been giving the MGMAT CATs over the last couple weeks and consistently scoring above 700.
The break up of my scores is given in my signature. I was wondering if the scoring algorithm on the verbal is right?
In my MGMAT 2, I had 5 incorrect on my verbal and ended up getting a 45. Yesterday, I got all the Verbal questions right and still got 45?

Is there anything I'm missing here?

Thanks
Sudhir
Current Student
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 326
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 7

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 21:17
Flawed or not flawed.. you are destroying those CATs! It does seem a little strange... you would assume if you didn't get a single question wrong then you should score at the maximum for that section. Although, V45 and V51 are basically the same thing on the bell curve. I wouldn't lose to much sleep over this.

How are you scoring on GMAT Prep CATs?
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 21:28
pike wrote:
Flawed or not flawed.. you are destroying those CATs! It does seem a little strange... you would assume if you didn't get a single question wrong then you should score at the maximum for that section. Although, V45 and V51 are basically the same thing on the bell curve. I wouldn't lose to much sleep over this.

How are you scoring on GMAT Prep CATs?

Yeah, Even thought the scoring is little odd, but I'm happy as long as i'm doing ok.
I havent given my GMAT prep till now. I plan to give my real gmat in the 2nd week of Aug. So will start the gmat prep around 20th. For the next 7-10 days, the target is gmatclub tests.
SVP
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1637
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Followers: 99

Kudos [?]: 640 [0], given: 432

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 21:39
This does seem a bit odd, but remember to consider the difficulty level of the questions as well. That might explain the odd score. For example, a test that only asks lower-level questions might prevent test takers from earning the full 51. The only other option that I can think of right now is that it is indeed a glitch.

The best thing to do, I suppose, is to simply ignore it and continue your studies. You seem to be in great shape so far!
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jul 2011, 22:00
Thanks Bmillan and Pike,
Yes, I think I shouldnt thinkmore about the scoring pattern and continue with my studies.
But you know , when you see all right answers , I was expecting 800
Anyway , I have generated the assessment report from manhattan website.
Its says a different story in terms of difficultly level .

I thing is clear , I need to work on on Quant timing. I was rushing on last 12 questions with 9 minutes left .. guessed some 4-5 and somehow worked. I cant be always lucky.
Attachments

AssessmentSummary_Sudhir_Nemani.xls [26.5 KiB]

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 397
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V32
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2011, 21:21
Can you explain your preparation so far? Thanks a lot.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 359
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 17

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2011, 17:05
First of all, congrats on your great scores and great preparation.

Please help us poor souls by telling us how you managed to attain the following and by giving us some guidance on how to improve.
1. 1:43 min avg in RC with 100% accuracy (Can we know your Strategy please?)
2. 1:16 min avg in CR with 100% accuracy (Any tips you would like to share?)

Thanks and will appreciate if you could spare few mins throwing some light at us.
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 19

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2011, 03:17
Congrats, Awesome scores ! You are butchering these tests!

I would suggest posting this question on MGMAT forum, if required they will have a look at your results to see if there are any bugs.

Also, as abhicoolmax stated, pls share your tips for RC and CR (along with mentioning the sources used for prep). Thanks!
_________________

Looking for Kudos

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2011, 10:17
abhicoolmax wrote:
First of all, congrats on your great scores and great preparation.

Please help us poor souls by telling us how you managed to attain the following and by giving us some guidance on how to improve.
1. 1:43 min avg in RC with 100% accuracy (Can we know your Strategy please?)
2. 1:16 min avg in CR with 100% accuracy (Any tips you would like to share?)

Thanks and will appreciate if you could spare few mins throwing some light at us.

Hi Abhi and Vinay:

RC: I have no particular strategy as such . I read the full passage once and then go back to the passage for specific question. What I feel is that the first read is very important. I need to know what the passage talks and and what does the author want to convey.
My accuracy in OG is 85%-95%, RC -99 -70%, Kaplan -85%

CR: All credit goes to Powerscore CR bible. I strongly feel that CR is only Practice. I did practice few LSAT Questions as well. Try downloading Aristotle LSAT - GMAT CR practice Questions. The most important TIP is understand the flow of sentences and identifying the key words. GMAT does everything to hide the keywords. our aim is to identify those.

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 359
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 17

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2011, 10:30
sudhir18n wrote:
Hi Abhi and Vinay:

RC: I have no particular strategy as such . I read the full passage once and then go back to the passage for specific question. What I feel is that the first read is very important. I need to know what the passage talks and and what does the author want to convey.
My accuracy in OG is 85%-95%, RC -99 -70%, Kaplan -85%

CR: All credit goes to Powerscore CR bible. I strongly feel that CR is only Practice. I did practice few LSAT Questions as well. Try downloading Aristotle LSAT - GMAT CR practice Questions. The most important TIP is understand the flow of sentences and identifying the key words. GMAT does everything to hide the keywords. our aim is to identify those.

Thanks brother for the tips.

I agree with you. I think for native speakers it might be easy to follow some Ninja strategy but most people I think it is most important to read the entire passage and get the gist of the passage fairly well before attacking the questions. I am improving as I practice more. Just ONE quick question: Do you go back to the passage while answering the question? The reason I asked is do take enough notes that you don't need to go back to the passage; rather I should ask what is your strategy on the first read?

For CR, yeah now I am feeling very confident. It's all about Powerscore Book + Practice
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2011, 11:00
abhicoolmax wrote:
sudhir18n wrote:
Hi Abhi and Vinay:

RC: I have no particular strategy as such . I read the full passage once and then go back to the passage for specific question. What I feel is that the first read is very important. I need to know what the passage talks and and what does the author want to convey.
My accuracy in OG is 85%-95%, RC -99 -70%, Kaplan -85%

CR: All credit goes to Powerscore CR bible. I strongly feel that CR is only Practice. I did practice few LSAT Questions as well. Try downloading Aristotle LSAT - GMAT CR practice Questions. The most important TIP is understand the flow of sentences and identifying the key words. GMAT does everything to hide the keywords. our aim is to identify those.

Thanks brother for the tips.

I agree with you. I think for native speakers it might be easy to follow some Ninja strategy but most people I think it is most important to read the entire passage and get the gist of the passage fairly well before attacking the questions. I am improving as I practice more. Just ONE quick question: Do you go back to the passage while answering the question? The reason I asked is do take enough notes that you don't need to go back to the passage; rather I should ask what is your strategy on the first read?

For CR, yeah now I am feeling very confident. It's all about Powerscore Book + Practice

Yes I go back to the passsage because I dont make any notes. But I feel, GMAT designs the qestions in a way that no matter what, we need to refer the passage again .Once you start hitting the 700-800 level questions on RC , most questions mimic CR. the hardest questions at those levels are strenthen , weaken ,infer , assumption types..
So no matter what u note down , you will have to refer to the passage. Notes help in main point and what each paragraph talks about. I have nothing against taking notes, but It never worked for me because i just cant write notes in 15 secs and rely only on those to answer
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2010
Posts: 359
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 17

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2011, 11:09
sudhir18n wrote:
Yes I go back to the passsage because I dont make any notes. But I feel, GMAT designs the qestions in a way that no matter what, we need to refer the passage again .Once you start hitting the 700-800 level questions on RC , most questions mimic CR. the hardest questions at those levels are strenthen , weaken ,infer , assumption types..
So no matter what u note down , you will have to refer to the passage. Notes help in main point and what each paragraph talks about. I have nothing against taking notes, but It never worked for me because i just cant write notes in 15 secs and rely only on those to answer

Thanks for your response. I do headline notes - For the 1st para I normally note like 5-10 words and just 2-4 words per para for the rest - this helps me absorb the content and get a big picture. So far it has been working decently. But your are right for tough questions you gotta get back to the passage. I guess as I become good at absorbing the content, I have feeling I should be able to do some or most of the noting in my brain. Hope I can get through the learning process soon and start enjoying the read more, and prepare myself to attack CR types questions more. Thanks!
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2010
Posts: 282
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Other)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 23

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2011, 11:55
sudhir18n wrote:
Hi I have been giving the MGMAT CATs over the last couple weeks and consistently scoring above 700.
The break up of my scores is given in my signature. I was wondering if the scoring algorithm on the verbal is right?
In my MGMAT 2, I had 5 incorrect on my verbal and ended up getting a 45. Yesterday, I got all the Verbal questions right and still got 45?

Is there anything I'm missing here?

Thanks
Sudhir

Woo! man you are outsmarting the MGMAT test! now to the question - it seems to me the level of questions may matter at the level you reaching ... nothing else one make out from such good stats
_________________

My GMAT Journey 540->680->730!

~ When the going gets tough, the Tough gets going!

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 19

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2011, 12:35
Thanks Sudhir for sharing the tips! and keep up with your performance, you are rocking those MGMAT tests!
_________________

Looking for Kudos

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 19

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2011, 10:47
Hi Sudhir, can you please share whether you are using 75 mins time limit for the Quant section of MGMATs? I looked at your assessment report and it shows that for correct answers (31/37) your time totals to 75+ mins and then you also have 6 wrong answers that add 12+mins. Just curious whether you did this test under timed or untimed condition? Thanks.
_________________

Looking for Kudos

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2011, 11:15
vinayrsm wrote:
Hi Sudhir, can you please share whether you are using 75 mins time limit for the Quant section of MGMATs? I looked at your assessment report and it shows that for correct answers (31/37) your time totals to 75+ mins and then you also have 6 wrong answers that add 12+mins. Just curious whether you did this test under timed or untimed condition? Thanks.

Yes except the second MGMAT test where set 90 mints on both .. quant took 84 mints ... verbal 63 mints..
other 3 tests have been timed ...

Last edited by sudhir18n on 17 Jul 2011, 11:31, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 19

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2011, 11:22
The report that you have posted on this thread belongs to your first test or third? As I see zero incorrect for Verbal in that report. Any particular reason why you chose to take Quant section for 90 mins? I am curious because I felt during my MGMAT CAT that several quant questions were doable but will take more than 3 mins, so I decided to guess and move on.
_________________

Looking for Kudos

Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 565
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 13

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2011, 11:37
vinayrsm wrote:
The report that you have posted on this thread belongs to your first test or third? As I see zero incorrect for Verbal in that report. Any particular reason why you chose to take Quant section for 90 mins? I am curious because I felt during my MGMAT CAT that several quant questions were doable but will take more than 3 mins, so I decided to guess and move on.

Sorry for the confusion Vinay .. I changed my post above.. wrongly written first test.. It was my second test( the very first was a practice test). The last test I wrote had 2 mistakes on verbal, both on RC.

Reason for 90 mints on quant : Yes Even I felt that the problems are doable but generally take ~3 mints . I wanted to test whether I can do these problems in an untimed environment. Last test was untimes with Q 50 . I had 10 questions left with 9 mints to spare .. Yes guessed 3/4 out of those and all wrong ...
Is there anything specific you do to tackle these tough ones? Have you tried GMAT prep? Will I be facing the same timing problem on quants even on the Gmat prep and on the real gmat?
Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 199
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 19

Re: Is the scoring flawed? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2011, 11:55
Thanks for clarifying Sudhir!

I think we should take MGMAT Quant tests results with a pinch of salt. I found a similar question on MGMAT forum and Stacey's answer to it: http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/mgm ... t1053.html

I feel that there are both +ves and -ves of MGMAT Quant test.

+ve is that it does prepare one for any tough problems on the real GMAT esp. if one's target is 750+ because at that level he/she will receive tough problems that most likely cannot be solved in ~2min and should be prepared to make an educated guess and move on. This will allow one to tackle the next question, which might be easier if the previous answer was wrong or even more tough if one got that right. And if it is the latter, then one needs to again try best to make an educated guess using ~1-2 mins and move on to keep the score at 750 level. So, in essence, I think it helps us to prepare well for such a situation.

-ve is that one is not able to do the question under timed condition (because questions require slightly length operation) and that deprives the experience of solving tough question in the real time and gain that learning (such as using method B if A is not working, trying diff things etc). There are many things to try out and learn from during a practice test and that is somehow blocked by having a tough question that is tough primarily due to multiple steps required and not due to conceptual foundation.

From what I have read on forums, you should be doing just fine on GMAT Prep and actual GMAT on quant.
_________________

Looking for Kudos

Re: Is the scoring flawed?   [#permalink] 17 Jul 2011, 11:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
GMAT's flaw. How to turn off answer confirmation? 5 14 Mar 2017, 23:55
CR prompts usually flawed 2 31 Jan 2016, 12:14
-->Kaplan CAT scores are flawed<-- 2 10 Oct 2014, 03:11
Flawed Practice Test? GMATprep 5 19 Jul 2014, 16:12
scores 0 04 Sep 2013, 07:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Is the scoring flawed?

Moderators: HiLine, WaterFlowsUp

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.