Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:45 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
 [55]
Kudos
Add Kudos
53
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
amanvermagmat
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,148
Own Kudos:
2,855
 [9]
Given Kudos: 480
Location: India
Posts: 1,148
Kudos: 2,855
 [9]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
jayantbakshi
Joined: 05 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Oct 2018
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Status:GMAT in August 2018
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
WE:Law (Consulting)
Posts: 40
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,707
 [3]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,707
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jayantbakshi
Bunuel
Is xy < 0?

(1) |x − y| > |x| − |y|
(2) x > y

Dear chetan2u,
Is there a way to solve this without plugging in numbers?
Thanks a lot, always.

Hi Jayant,

If you can imagine these numbers on a number line it will help you..

Points which can help you reduce number of plugging...
1) |X|-|y| will never be greater than |x-y|
2) whenever |y|>|X|, LHS, |x-y|, will be POSITIVE while RHS, |X|-|y| will be negative..
So when both X and y are positive and y>X,
Or both negative and x>y
3) whenever the signs are different, again statement I will be true..

Knowing above points, you would know that statement I is true for both cases- one when both are same sign and second when both are different...
but we are looking for both X and y of different sign..

Combined..
Even if x>0....
Both can be negative
Or both can be of different sign..
So insufficient..

Even rules for |X+y|<|X|+|y| can be learnt
User avatar
GyMrAT
Joined: 14 Dec 2017
Last visit: 03 Nov 2020
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
509
 [2]
Given Kudos: 173
Location: India
Posts: 412
Kudos: 509
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is xy < 0?

(1) |x − y| > |x| − |y|
(2) x > y

Question: is xy < 0 ?

Statement 1: |x − y| > |x| − |y|

for x = 0, y = -1, we get 1 > -1....hence xy = 0...therefore NO
for x = 1, y = -1, we get 2 > 0....hence xy < 0...therefore YES

Statement 1 is not sufficient.


Statement 2: x > y

for x = 0, y = -1, we get 0 > -1...hence xy = 0....therefore NO
for x = 1, y = -1, we get 1 > -1...hence xy < 0....therefore YES

Statement 2 is not sufficient.


Combining, we can use
x = 0, y = -1, to satisfy both statements & we get xy = 0...NO
x = 1, y = -1, to satisfy both statements & we get xy < 0...YES

Combining is not Sufficient.


Answer E.


Thanks,
GyM
User avatar
kaladin123
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Jul 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 747
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q39 V39
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38 (Online)
GPA: 3.11
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38 (Online)
Posts: 135
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Is xy < 0?

(1) |x − y| > |x| − |y|
(2) x > y

Let me attempt to solve this using Avi's number line approach.
avigutman - request you to share your expert advice! :)

The question is asking us whether \(x\) & \(y\) are on the opposite sides of 0 on the number line.



From S1: \(|x-y| > |x|-|y|\)

\(|x-y|\) represents the distance between \(x\) & \(y\) on the number line.



S1 will only be true when \(x\) and \(y\) are only opposite sides of 0.

Now, we need to check this statement for boundary values. What if \(x\) or \(y\) are 0.
If \(x=0\), then S1 is always true.
If \(y=0\), then S1 doesn't hold.
There is a danger of making a mistake here. I got this step wrong while solving the problem the first time.

To summarize: S1 tells us that \(xy < 0\) as long as \(y \ne 0\). But, \(x\) could be 0. So, \(xy \le 0\). S1 is insufficient.

From S2: \(x > y\)



S2 tells us the relative position of x and y on the number line. It doesn't tell us where 0 is on the number line.
Insufficient.

Hence E.
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,350
Own Kudos:
742
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,350
Kudos: 742
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is: X < Y?


Absolute Value Rule:
For any real values of X and Y, it will always hold true that:

[X - Y] >/= [X] - [Y]


The right side can NEVER be greater than the left side for any real values of X and Y

(1)the 2 sides can equal in a couple of cases

Case 1:

X * Y > 0

And

[X] > [Y] ————> if the absolute value of Y is GREATER than the absolute value of X, then you will end up with a negative value on the right hand side, while the left hand side will remain positive

OR

Case 2: Y = 0

Then the inequality changes and becomes: [X] = [X]


We are given in the first statement:

Statement (1): [X - Y] > [X] - [Y]

remembering that the right hand side can take a (-)negative value, while the right hand side can never be negative can help you decide whether the statement is sufficient or not


Finding a YES: XY < 0

Case 1: if the signs of X and Y are different, the subtraction inside the absolute value Modulus on the left side will 1st INCREASE the magnitude of the 2 values when combined

However, on the right side, because we are taking the absolute value of each first and THEN subtracting, the value on the right hand side will still decrease

Case 1: X = +4 And Y = -2

[4 - (-2)] > [4] - [-2]

[4 + 2] > 4 - 2

6 > 2

So we can have the signs of X and Y be opposite (XY < 0) and still satisfy statement 1.

Furthermore: X > Y ——- +4 > -2
(satisfies statement 2)

YES to the question stem


Finding a NO ——— XY > 0

Case 2: as long as the MAGNITUDE of the Y value is greater than the Magnitude of the X value, we will always end up with a (-)negative value on the right hand side of statement 1’s inequality.

This is true even if X and Y both have the same signs (XY > 0) —— X’s value can be greater than (but magnitude less than) Y’s value when both variables are (-)negative values

Case 2: X = -2 and Y = -4

When we multiply two negative values we get a positive value ———> XY > 0 ——-NO to the question stem

Satisfy s1: [-2 - (-4)] > [-2] - [-4]

[-2 + 4] > 2 - 4

+2 > -2 ——- s1 satisfied


S2 satisfied: X > Y ———-> -2 > -4

NO

Since we can get a YES and a NO when both statements are applied, the answer is

E

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ShubhadeepB
Joined: 30 Apr 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
7
 [1]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 30
Kudos: 7
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As per my understanding, the question actually asks: Can x be -ve AND y +ve OR x +ve AND y -ve?

Statement 1: |x-y| > |x| - |y|

Statement 1 satisfies the following conditions:
Condition 1: x -ve AND y +ve e.g. x = -2 and y = 3 ----> |-2-3| > |-2| - |3| so, 5 > -1

Condition 2: x +ve AND y -ve e.g. x = 3 and y = -2 -----> |3-(-2)| > |3| - |-2| so, 5 > 1

Condition 3: x and y BOTH -ve e.g. x = -2 and y = -3 ----> |-2-(-3)| > |-2| - |-3| so, 1 > -1

Only statement 1 is not sufficient to answer the question

Statement 2: x > y

Here, both x and y could be positive OR both x and y could be negative OR x is +ve AND y is -ve

Only statement 2 is not sufficient to answer the question

Combining statements 1 and 2, we get two conditions:
1. Both x AND y are -ve ------> xy > 0
2. x is +ve AND y is -ve ------> xy < 0

Even by combining two statements, we get two different answers to the questions stem. Therefore, E is the correct answer choice.
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,931
 [1]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,931
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nice work, kaladin123!
Just a bit of feedback here on your analysis of statement (1):
kaladin123


From S1: \(|x-y| > |x|-|y|\)

\(|x-y|\) represents the distance between \(x\) & \(y\) on the number line.

S1 will only be true when \(x\) and \(y\) are only opposite sides of 0.

Now, we need to check this statement for boundary values. What if \(x\) or \(y\) are 0.
If \(x=0\), then S1 is always true.
If \(y=0\), then S1 doesn't hold.
There is a danger of making a mistake here. I got this step wrong while solving the problem the first time.

To summarize: S1 tells us that \(xy < 0\) as long as \(y \ne 0\). But, \(x\) could be 0. So, \(xy \le 0\). S1 is insufficient.

No need to check boundary values. Rather, observe that statement (1) allows for any case in which y is farther away from zero than x is, as such cases would mean a positive left hand side with a negative right hand side.
Whenever you're dealing with absolute values, you must take note that they're incapable of being negative. This has a great impact on the analysis of the absolute value of a difference vs the difference of absolute values (the former can't be negative, but the latter can be negative).

So, statement (1) implies that x and y are on opposite sides of zero (leading to a YES) or that y is farther away from zero than x is (leading to either a YES or a NO).
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 1,293
Own Kudos:
1,931
 [2]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,293
Kudos: 1,931
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning starts at 0:26:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
sonalshenoy
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 14 Jan 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 193
Posts: 8
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is xy < 0?

(1) |x − y| > |x| − |y|
(2) x > y

But there is this rule we've learnt:
|x| - |y| <= | x-y|
a. If xy > 0, |x| - |y| = | x-y |
b. If xy < 0, |x| - |y| < | x-y|

Isn't statement 1 of the question just the same as point b here?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,392
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sonalshenoy
Bunuel
Is xy < 0?

(1) |x − y| > |x| − |y|
(2) x > y

But there is this rule we've learnt:
|x| - |y| <= | x-y|
a. If xy > 0, |x| - |y| = | x-y |
b. If xy < 0, |x| - |y| < | x-y|

Isn't statement 1 of the question just the same as point b here?


\(|x|-|y|\leq{|x-y|}\). Note that "=" sign holds when \(x \leq y \leq 0\) or when \(0 \leq y \leq x\). So, essentially when \(xy \geq 0\) AND \(|x| \geq |y|\)

Hence, \(|x|-|y| < |x - y|\), given in (1), does not necessarily mean that xy < 0. It means that we can have any of the following four cases:

\(y < x \leq 0\). In this case \(xy \geq 0\).
\( 0 < x < y\). In this case \(xy > 0\).

\(x \leq 0 < y\). In this case \(xy \leq 0\).
\(y<0<x\). In this case \(xy < 0\)

FYI, there is another similar property:
\(|x|+|y|\geq|x+y|\). Note that "=" sign holds for \(xy\geq{0}\) (or simply when \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign). So, the strict inequality (>) holds when \(xy<0\);
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts