pacifist85
Hey,
I would say D.
[1] says that \(\frac{b}{x}\) > \(\frac{y}{a}\)
If we cross multiply we get that ab>xy. So the answer is No, so it is sufficient.
[2] gives the same relationship we found for [1], but squared. I think it means the same, because if I remember correctly, we only take the positive value of a radical in GMAT.
So, it is also sufficient.
No. You can't cross multiply because nowhere the signs of any of the variables is specified.
Instead, You have to bring everything on one side of the inequality and then take LCM. If you do this, You will end up noticing that ab>xy depends on the value of a and x. If both have the same sign, then ab>xy, otherwise ab<xy. Therefore, Not sufficient.
You need to take the same approach for the statement 2, you will again end up with insufficiency.
PS: cross multiplication is allowed only when the signs of the variables are known. Even in that situation, you need to be very sure with inequality. Best approach is not to cross multiply but bring all variables on one side of the inequality and then review.