Pankaj0901
How can we double down on Option B despite no clear information on the SUPPLY trend in the future. The passage doesn't state that the SUPPLY will surely decrease or increase. Currently, the demand meets supply. In the future, DEMAND will be low, as number of students graduating will be low. But, the Supply can A) remain constant, B) increase further, or C) decrease more than the decrease in DEMAND. In all these 3 cases, SUPPLY will NOT match with DEMAND. But, in case of C) SUPPLY decreases more than the decrease in DEMAND, the option B will not hold. How can we infer option B?
Quote:
Most employers were not aware that, although the supply of graduates currently meets demand, this situation could change.
AndrewN - Request you to please enlighten.
Note what the passage tells us,
Pankaj0901, regarding current and expected
trends:
- Job prospects for college graduates have never been better (line one)
- Most employers were unaware that the number of students graduating from college would decline (sentence three)
- The number of undergraduates pursuing in-demand degrees has dropped substantially (line five)
If fewer students continue to graduate and fewer of these graduates hold degrees that employers want or require, then it is quite conceivable that in the near future,
there is likely to be a shortage of graduates to fill certain vacancies, particularly if the employers continue not to anticipate or plan for these trends (line three). Note that in an inference question, we need not find an answer that
must be true, just one that fits the logical map of the passage. No other answer choice can be justified, at least in my view.
Perhaps the question makes more sense now. Thank you for thinking to ask.
- Andrew