GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 12 Dec 2018, 20:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.

It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 180
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
GMAT ToolKit User
It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Mar 2014, 02:32
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

44% (01:12) correct 56% (01:13) wrong based on 494 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones cause immediate damage to the membrane in the ear and results in hearing impairment. Hence one is advised to avoid using a cell phone to prevent total loss of hearing.

Which of the following if true seriously weakens the above argument?

A. Use of electronic gadgets such as computers also impairs hearing besides affecting eye-sight.

B. Electronic gadgets such as iPods do not damage hearing in users.

C. A majority of those who use hearing aids are found never to have use cell phones in their lives.

D. It is found in the survey that 90% of employees working as telephone operators have been regular users of cell phones for years.

E. Some people use cell phones even while riding two wheelers.

_________________

petrifiedbutstanding


Originally posted by petrifiedbutstanding on 08 Mar 2014, 05:08.
Last edited by carcass on 09 Mar 2014, 02:32, edited 1 time in total.
The title of the post must be the same of the first sentence
Most Helpful Community Reply
SVP
SVP
User avatar
G
Status: Top MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1520
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: Q800 V740
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2014, 09:49
6
As (A), (B), and (E) are clearly out of scope here, we need to look more closely at (C) and (D).

(C): Even if a majority of those who use hearing aids have never used cell phones, this proves that there other causes besides the usage of cell phones that can lead to hearing loss. However, this still does not weaken the assertion that cell phones can cause hearing damage. This is therefore not a good enough choice. Reject.
(D): Although this choice becomes the automatic answer through elimination, we should also verify if this option holds logically. The stimulus states that cell phone usage leads to immediate hearing damage, and further concludes that using a cell phone may lead to total loss of hearing. However, if (D) is true, and 90% of telephone operators have been using cell phones for years, this weakens the stimulus' conclusion. If cell phone usage did cause immediate hearing damage, and prolonged usage led to total hearing loss, these telephone operators couldn't possibly have been using cell phones for years (as if their hearing was damaged after some use, they could not continue to use cell phones). This option therefore weakens the conclusion and is the correct choice.

(D) it is.
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Top MBA Admissions Consulting | Top MiM Admissions Consulting

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2013
Posts: 54
Re: Radiation from cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2014, 07:35
I will go with C.
Cause: Radiations emitted by cellphones
Effect: Total loss of hearing

To weaken: We want some other cause. Other cause is mentioned in C. SO C is 100% right.

D is tempting but majority is more preferred than actual figures. 90% of 10 people will be only 9. SO only 9 people are telephone operators.

Thus I think C is better.

Can someone add?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 230
Location: India
Re: Radiation from cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2014, 08:04
4
I think D is weakening the argument.
If majority of telephone operators have been using cell phones FOR YEARS,the argument that radiations CAUSE IMMEDIATE DAMAGE is weakened.
But again we don't know any aspect of the survey which reported these findings.
As for C,majority of those who use hearing aid have never used cell phones doesn't seem to weaken the argument.It is merely employing reverse logic:
cell phone->hearing impairment
hearing impairment->no cell phone use
C is not sufficient to deny that cell phones cause ear damage.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Dec 2013
Posts: 54
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2014, 10:59
Gr8 explanation GyanOne. Now completely convinced with D.
Thanks and +1 Kudos.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 142
Location: Canada
Schools: LBS '18
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
WE: Design (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2014, 16:22
1
GyanOne wrote:
As (A), (B), and (E) are clearly out of scope here, we need to look more closely at (C) and (D).

(C): Even if a majority of those who use hearing aids have never used cell phones, this proves that there other causes besides the usage of cell phones that can lead to hearing loss. However, this still does not weaken the assertion that cell phones can cause hearing damage. This is therefore not a good enough choice. Reject.
(D): Although this choice becomes the automatic answer through elimination, we should also verify if this option holds logically. The stimulus states that cell phone usage leads to immediate hearing damage, and further concludes that using a cell phone may lead to total loss of hearing. However, if (D) is true, and 90% of telephone operators have been using cell phones for years, this weakens the stimulus' conclusion. If cell phone usage did cause immediate hearing damage, and prolonged usage led to total hearing loss, these telephone operators couldn't possibly have been using cell phones for years (as if their hearing was damaged after some use, they could not continue to use cell phones). This option therefore weakens the conclusion and is the correct choice.

(D) it is.


' If cell phone usage did cause immediate hearing damage, and prolonged usage led to total hearing loss ' - your clause regarding total hearing loss is not mentioned anywhere in the premise.

In my opinion it's A.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8665
Location: Pune, India
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2014, 19:25
1
1
gauravkaushik8591 wrote:

' If cell phone usage did cause immediate hearing damage, and prolonged usage led to total hearing loss ' - your clause regarding total hearing loss is not mentioned anywhere in the premise.

In my opinion it's A.


I think I understand where you are coming from. The problem is that the conclusion: "avoid using a cell phone to prevent total loss of hearing"
is implying that cell phone use causes total loss of hearing even though it is worded awkwardly. It is not implying that if you don't use a cell phone, you will not suffer from total loss of hearing. Note that had that been true, in addition to (A), option (C) would have been a valid weakener too since it gives you that other factors can cause hearing loss.

The conclusion is "Use of cell phone cause total loss of hearing"

What we need to weaken it is not an alternative reason for hearing loss but instead proof that use of cell phone does not cause loss of hearing.

(D) tells you that 90% telephone operators (people who use their hearing ability at work) used cell phone for years. But since they are working as telephone operators, their hearing must be still intact. Hence, this is proof that cell phone use doesn't cause total hearing loss. So (D) is a weakener.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2015
Posts: 22
It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2016, 19:55
Hi GyanOne,
If D is correct, are we not assuming that telephone operators job is involved with good hearing.
It is true in real world but according to passage isn't it out of scope. Moreover, they might be using their cell phones with hearing loss.

C says that in majority cases the cause is absent when the effect is present. It can be a weakner since it creates enough doubt on the conclusion.

Please correct if there are any conceptual gaps.

Thanks,
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8665
Location: Pune, India
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2016, 20:34
The conclusion we have in the argument is this: "avoid using a cell phone to prevent total loss of hearing"
This implies that cell phone use causes total loss of hearing (even though it is worded awkwardly). It is not implying that if you don't use a cell phone, you will not suffer from total loss of hearing.

The conclusion is not: ONLY cell phone use causes total loss of hearing.
Had that been true, both (A) and (C) would have been valid weakeners.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 846
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2016, 09:59
jpvemula wrote:
Hi GyanOne,
If D is correct, are we not assuming that telephone operators job is involved with good hearing.
It is true in real world but according to passage isn't it out of scope. Moreover, they might be using their cell phones with hearing loss.

C says that in majority cases the cause is absent when the effect is present. It can be a weakner since it creates enough doubt on the conclusion.

Please correct if there are any conceptual gaps.

Thanks,


Hi!

The conclusion states that use of cellphone should be avoided because it causes total loss of hearing.

Now to weaken the conclusion if we could have any premise showing that cellphone do not cause loss of hearing, we can prove that the conclusion is not justified.

Let's look at the statement C and D

C. A majority of those who use hearing aids are found never to have use cell phones in their lives. It says people who are using hearing aids have never used cellphones. But does it conclude that cellphone causes hearing loss? If they have never used cellphones, we don't know weather cellphones cause hearing loss.

D. It is found in the survey that 90% of employees working as telephone operators have been regular users of cell phones for years. 'Have been using' implies that they started using in the past and are still using the cellphones. If cellphones caused hearing loss, they would not have been working as telephone operators. Hence, their hearing is intact. It weakens the conclusion.
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2018
Posts: 12
It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 23 Nov 2018, 11:31
If cell phone usage did cause immediate hearing damage and prolonged usage led to total hearing loss, these telephone operators couldn't possibly have been using cell phones for years :/ I wear hearing aids for over 10 years and I went with Audiology Island as they are fully registered in the USA to sell hearing aid products. I'd really like to see hearing aids become more realistically affordable. Same goes for medication & supplies for diabetics.

Originally posted by bekka6 on 22 Nov 2018, 05:47.
Last edited by bekka6 on 23 Nov 2018, 11:31, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 530
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2018, 03:08
VeritasPrepBrian VeritasKarishma DmitryFarber SaraiGMAT jennpt chetan2u

The first sentence of the argument " it is generally believed ....." . Can we challenge this??? because it is a belief and not a plain fact . By using option D we are actually attacking that belief itself right???
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Aug 2017
Posts: 281
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2018, 06:47
C is very close to argument and seem correct choice because person having hearing impairment have never used cell phones.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1357
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2018, 00:42
This is not a valid CR question. It requires us to assume that one cannot work as a telephone operator with impaired hearing. There's absolutely no reason to assume that, especially since we are given no definition of what hearing impairment is. Pretty much all adults have some level of hearing impairment. So what?

The major flaw in the original argument is the leap from a BELIEF about IMPAIRMENT to a warning that we should avoid use to avoid TOTAL HEARING LOSS. Who says this belief is correct? (Yes, AdityaHongunti, we can challenge something that is just a belief, unless that belief is stated with complete authority, as in "All novels are creative.") And if it is correct, who says that IMPAIRMENT will lead to TOTAL HEARING LOSS. Further, even if this will happen, how do we know that we must avoid use? Maybe the value of cell phone use is worth it! All of these are assumptions, but the OA addresses none of them.
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

GMAT Club Bot
Re: It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones &nbs [#permalink] 28 Nov 2018, 00:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is generally said that radiations emitted by cell phones

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.