CR Butler Questions January- 5 :
CR Questions January- 5 :Q1. Budget constraints have made police officials consider reassigning a considerable number of officers from traffic enforcement to work on higher-priority, serious crimes. Reducing traffic enforcement for this reason would be counterproductive, however, in light of the tendency of criminals to use cars when engaged in the commission of serious crimes. An officer stopping a car for a traffic violation can make a search that turns up evidence of serious crime.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument given?
(A) An officer who stops a car containing evidence of the commission of a serious crime risks a violent confrontation, even if the vehicle was stopped only for a traffic violation.
(B) When the public becomes aware that traffic enforcement has lessened, it typically becomes lax in obeying traffic rules.
(C) Those willing to break the law to commit serious crimes are often in committing such crimes unwilling to observe what they regard as the lesser constraints of traffic law.
(D) The offenders committing serious crimes who would be caught because of traffic violations are not the same group of individuals as those who would be caught if the arresting officers were reassigned from traffic enforcement.
(E) The great majority of persons who are stopped by officers for traffic violations are not guilty of any serious crimes.
Q1. Budget constraints have made police officials consider reassigning a considerable number of officers from traffic enforcement to work on higher-priority, serious crimes. Reducing traffic enforcement for this reason would be counterproductive, however, in light of the tendency of criminals to use cars when engaged in the commission of serious crimes. An officer stopping a car for a traffic violation can make a search that turns up evidence of serious crime.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument given?
(A) An officer who stops a car containing evidence of the commission of a serious crime risks a violent confrontation, even if the vehicle was stopped only for a traffic violation.
(B) When the public becomes aware that traffic enforcement has lessened, it typically becomes lax in obeying traffic rules.
(C) Those willing to break the law to commit serious crimes are often in committing such crimes unwilling to observe what they regard as the lesser constraints of traffic law.
(D) The offenders committing serious crimes who would be caught because of traffic violations are not the same group of individuals as those who would be caught if the arresting officers were reassigned from traffic enforcement.
(E) The great majority of persons who are stopped by officers for traffic violations are not guilty of any serious crimes.
Q2. Countries that repeatedly violate international trade laws are usually penalized for such violations by being banned from the international trade market for short periods of time following each infraction. Analyses of trade market behavior have shown that over 50 percent of such countries exhibit a marked tendency to wait for a period of at least twelve months before violating the laws again. Some experts believe that
this trend suggests that these repeat offenders may be kept in check by banning them as punishment. However, the penalty for such infractions should clearly be harsher, since
just below 50 percent of the violators, after all, do repeat the offence within the span of a year.
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first is an opinion that is opposed by the author’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
B. The first is a judgment that is disputed in the argument; the second is an observation that supports the author’s conclusion.
C. The first is an explanation that the argument as a whole seeks to establish; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
D. The first is a belief that the argument opposes; the second is a consideration raised to support that belief.
E. The first is a belief that the argument does not support; the second is the position that the argument as a whole seeks to establish.