Last visit was: 05 May 2026, 09:47 It is currently 05 May 2026, 09:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
nevergiveup
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Last visit: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 312
Kudos: 1,614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
nevergiveup
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Last visit: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 312
Kudos: 1,614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nevergiveup


I have contacted knewton support. They said that they are going to have the tech people take look at the test score.
As for GMATPrep test, I still try not to touch it. I have taken it too much in the past that I have already memorized most of the questions and answers. Now that I haven't touched it for about 3 month. I try to give it one more month so I can forget at least some of the questions and start a little fresh.

What about MGMAT CATs? I don't like their questions, but their scores are usually pretty close to GMATPrep results.
User avatar
nevergiveup
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Last visit: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 312
Kudos: 1,614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Avernusaur
nevergiveup


I have contacted knewton support. They said that they are going to have the tech people take look at the test score.
As for GMATPrep test, I still try not to touch it. I have taken it too much in the past that I have already memorized most of the questions and answers. Now that I haven't touched it for about 3 month. I try to give it one more month so I can forget at least some of the questions and start a little fresh.

What about MGMAT CATs? I don't like their questions, but their scores are usually pretty close to GMATPrep results.

I agree MGMAT CAT are good practice. I took each of the six MGMAT CAT three times. My verbal score was around 38-40ish. I just don't know why all my previous real exam my verbal score was all around 27,28. I don't understand. I have to admit that I do have a little test anxiety especially with verbal section.
User avatar
icandy
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
2,187
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 618
Kudos: 2,187
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
K, I took the Knewton Diagnostic CAT and got a 720.

48 Q 40 V

5 Q wrong

3 V wrong (1 RC + 1 SC +1 CR ) Lost 1 SC due to over analysis.

As few said, the Quant and Verbal for the most part are easy. I really doubt the GMATprep and GMAT are comparable.

Verbal, most SC and CR questions were very very like the OG questions. I will bet that if one is trying to get past 40 in V, he/she has to identify new patterns in SC, although same concepts, in the test. GMAT is clearly not giving out 40+ in V just for learning and
identifying the patterns in the book

B T W, the exam clock does not stop between questions while the next question is displayed. I actually Waited 7 secs on one question. Needless to say, I was on wireless but the software should stop the clock, if the next question is not displayed instantly




So Now what I am thinking is, Should I take the course or should I invest my time in self preparation? I have got nothing to lose as my baseline score is 720 and Knewton is saying that if I do the HW's and take all classes, I should get a 770. I will take that score over 890$ in a nano second.
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
icandy
K, I took the Knewton Diagnostic CAT and got a 720.

48 Q 40 V

5 Q wrong

3 V wrong (1 RC + 1 SC +1 CR ) Lost 1 SC due to over analysis.

As few said, the Quant and Verbal for the most part are easy. I really doubt the GMATprep and GMAT are comparable.

Verbal, most SC and CR questions were very very like the OG questions. I will bet that if one is trying to get past 40 in V, he/she has to identify new patterns in SC, although same concepts, in the test. GMAT is clearly not giving out 40+ in V just for learning and
identifying the patterns in the book

B T W, the exam clock does not stop between questions while the next question is displayed. I actually Waited 7 secs on one question. Needless to say, I was on wireless but the software should stop the clock, if the next question is not displayed instantly




So Now what I am thinking is, Should I take the course or should I invest my time in self preparation? I have got nothing to lose as my baseline score is 720 and Knewton is saying that if I do the HW's and take all classes, I should get a 770. I will take that score over 890$ in a nano second.

I think $890 is a bit overpriced for a program that is still in an academic beta. Although the CATs appear to have room for improvement, the rest of the program is still pretty good. As you've noted, the SC questions are very similar to OG11. In fact, some questions are copied directly from the OG, but the nouns are changed. Although the question stem will seem familiar, they often test slightly different concepts.

Based on where things stand today, this is my view of the CAT world:
GMAT Prep - Easily #1
Manhattan GMAT - Neither Quant nor Verbal questions are representative of the real GMAT, but the estimated scores are reasonably accurate.
Knewton - The scoring needs some work, but the questions are very similar to the GMAT. Unfortunately, the CAT currently fails to deliver enough 700+ level questions.

It's a toss up between MGMAT and Knewton for me right now. I really dislike the fact that MGMAT encourages you to study the wrong ideas, but Knewton's scoring and poor progression for question difficulty present a new series of issues.

If you're looking for a new approach to the GMAT, and you don't mind being a lab rat, Knewton might be for you. It's just too early in this program's development to give it a solid recommendation. The instructors are really great though.
User avatar
icandy
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 618
Kudos: 2,187
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Avernusaur

It's a toss up between MGMAT and Knewton for me right now. I really dislike the fact that MGMAT encourages you to study the wrong ideas, but Knewton's scoring and poor progression for question difficulty present a new series of issues.

If you're looking for a new approach to the GMAT, and you don't mind being a lab rat, Knewton might be for you. It's just too early in this program's development to give it a solid recommendation. The instructors are really great though.

I dont know whether that is entirely correct or not. What I am told by some one who is an instructor is that questions on parabola's and Geometric progressions are becoming very common. While the MGMAT Quant is still a stretch by all means, the verbal seems to be pretty close and the sort of stuff that will help one get past 700. If you look at the advanced concepts in the 4th edition SC guide, there are going to be questions that will come to your mind and if you have a good memory you will soon remember that the OG explanation sucks and MGMAT pretty much peeled the onion for all such similar questions.
User avatar
nevergiveup
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Last visit: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 312
Kudos: 1,614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
icandy
Avernusaur

It's a toss up between MGMAT and Knewton for me right now. I really dislike the fact that MGMAT encourages you to study the wrong ideas, but Knewton's scoring and poor progression for question difficulty present a new series of issues.

If you're looking for a new approach to the GMAT, and you don't mind being a lab rat, Knewton might be for you. It's just too early in this program's development to give it a solid recommendation. The instructors are really great though.

I dont know whether that is entirely correct or not. What I am told by some one who is an instructor is that questions on parabola's and Geometric progressions are becoming very common. While the MGMAT Quant is still a stretch by all means, the verbal seems to be pretty close and the sort of stuff that will help one get past 700. If you look at the advanced concepts in the 4th edition SC guide, there are going to be questions that will come to your mind and if you have a good memory you will soon remember that the OG explanation sucks and MGMAT pretty much peeled the onion for all such similar questions.

I am not sure about parabola's and geometric progressions are becoming very common, but I did encounter one parabola question on my last real GMAT exam.
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
icandy
Avernusaur

It's a toss up between MGMAT and Knewton for me right now. I really dislike the fact that MGMAT encourages you to study the wrong ideas, but Knewton's scoring and poor progression for question difficulty present a new series of issues.

If you're looking for a new approach to the GMAT, and you don't mind being a lab rat, Knewton might be for you. It's just too early in this program's development to give it a solid recommendation. The instructors are really great though.

I dont know whether that is entirely correct or not. What I am told by some one who is an instructor is that questions on parabola's and Geometric progressions are becoming very common. While the MGMAT Quant is still a stretch by all means, the verbal seems to be pretty close and the sort of stuff that will help one get past 700. If you look at the advanced concepts in the 4th edition SC guide, there are going to be questions that will come to your mind and if you have a good memory you will soon remember that the OG explanation sucks and MGMAT pretty much peeled the onion for all such similar questions.

To clarify - I don't believe there's a single question type in the MGMAT CATs that isn't capable of appearing on a real exam. However, I do believe that MGMAT overemphasizes the frequency of some question types. While it can be helpful to study more difficult and complicated material to increase speed and stamina, it is perhaps more important to spend the most time studying the concepts that you will definitely see on the exam.

I own the 3rd edition SC guide, so I haven't read the 4th edition, but that's outside the scope of what I said anyway (I was comparing CATs - not study materials). The guides are great, but the CATs can be misleading.

For what it's worth, I do use the MGMAT CATs occasionally for an additional reference point. I'm only one data point though.
User avatar
icandy
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Last visit: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 618
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 618
Kudos: 2,187
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Avernusaur
icandy
Avernusaur

It's a toss up between MGMAT and Knewton for me right now. I really dislike the fact that MGMAT encourages you to study the wrong ideas, but Knewton's scoring and poor progression for question difficulty present a new series of issues.

If you're looking for a new approach to the GMAT, and you don't mind being a lab rat, Knewton might be for you. It's just too early in this program's development to give it a solid recommendation. The instructors are really great though.

I dont know whether that is entirely correct or not. What I am told by some one who is an instructor is that questions on parabola's and Geometric progressions are becoming very common. While the MGMAT Quant is still a stretch by all means, the verbal seems to be pretty close and the sort of stuff that will help one get past 700. If you look at the advanced concepts in the 4th edition SC guide, there are going to be questions that will come to your mind and if you have a good memory you will soon remember that the OG explanation sucks and MGMAT pretty much peeled the onion for all such similar questions.

To clarify - I don't believe there's a single question type in the MGMAT CATs that isn't capable of appearing on a real exam. However, I do believe that MGMAT overemphasizes the frequency of some question types. While it can be helpful to study more difficult and complicated material to increase speed and stamina, it is perhaps more important to spend the most time studying the concepts that you will definitely see on the exam.

I own the 3rd edition SC guide, so I haven't read the 4th edition, but that's outside the scope of what I said anyway (I was comparing CATs - not study materials). The guides are great, but the CATs can be misleading.

For what it's worth, I do use the MGMAT CATs occasionally for an additional reference point. I'm only one data point though.

Ahh! I Thanks for the clarification. I some how missed the point that you were specifically talking about the CAT's. I agree with what you are saying on the importance of what we see on the exam but I am starting to feel that few SC questions will be unlike those in the OG/VR and thats where MGMAT might be helpful. Take a peek at the 4th edition, it seems useful to me.
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CAT #3 Update

Score: 750 (Q48, V45)

Quant (48)
-Missed 1 Question (#22)

Verbal (45)
-Missed 4 Questions (# 1, 13, 14, 24)
-Wrong Answers (3 SC, 1 RC)

Analysis
I've been supplementing my Knewton coursework with Jeff Sackmann's Total GMAT Math, so I was expecting to see a small increase in my Quant score. The CAT still isn't providing a significant number of difficult quant questions. After finishing the quant section, I made a note to myself that the questions felt as if they were in the 46-48 range.

The increase in SC errors is a little disappointing, but I haven't been studying SC much at all. It's always hard to balance Quant vs. Verbal.

I think I'm going to take GMATPrep #1 next weekend, so we can tie all the results together and see what the correlation is.

Here's my Knewton CAT history so far:

CAT #3 07/04/2009 at 02:59PM | Q48 V45 750
CAT #2 06/20/2009 at 02:46PM | Q46 V45 730
CAT #1 05/25/2009 at 12:42PM | Q46 V32 640 (Diagnostic - really out of practice)
avatar
linfongyu
Joined: 11 May 2003
Last visit: 14 Nov 2009
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There must be something wrong with the timer function of the Knewton GMAT CAT. I finished my first diagnostic WAY early, 57' for Quant and 66' for Verbal, something that never happened during my 3 actual tests, all of which I struggled with pacing. I emailed support yesterday. Let's hear what Knewton have to say about this.
avatar
whartonhereicome
Joined: 10 Jun 2009
Last visit: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just bought the Knewton course. My OCD is acting up again so please bear with me. :lol: I can’t decide which schedule to take, the 2 times a week classes or the once a week classes. I’m also thinking of just creating my own schedule and watch the archived classes. IIRC, the 2 times a week session is about 1 ½ months long, while the once a week session is about 3 ½ months long.

I’ve been preparing for the last 2 ½ months already. For 2 ½ months I’ve read pretty good books like Sackmann’s Total Gmat Math, Powerscore’s CR bible and MGmat’s SC bible. These are solid books. I probably just need to read them again or at least review them.

Despite my preparation however, I scored very low in my Knewton diagnostic exam. (Q and V are both low, too embarrassed to mention right now :oops: ) I’m worried about regressing if I go with the once a week classes. I’ve read so much about the “law of diminishing returns” if I take my review beyond 3-4 months (something like that) or worse suffer burn out. On the other hand I might get information overload if I go with the 2 times a week classes. Has anyone tried either of the schedules I mentioned? How did you find them? Was it too hectic, too long or what have you? How about creating your own schedule and watching the archived classes? Has anyone tried this? Sorry for being too anal about it. :) I just can’t believe that I got a very low score in my Knewton diagnostic exam, since almost everybody here seems to find the questions easy or at least not particularly difficult. Well, I did find the question not particularly difficult also. In fact I finished about 25 minutes early in the verbal section and 5 minutes early in the quant section. I’m just surprised with my very low score. I tried to justify it by finding some excuses such as my lack of sleep (5 hrs.) and my carelessness. But excuses are just that, the real gmat won’t care.

Whew. It feels good to get it off my chest. At any rate thanks for reading my whinings. :lol: I just want to maximize my preparation without going overboard or regressing. My target gmat score is still 700 plus. Anyway, hopefully all of us get our target gmat scores. TIA

P.S. Just wondering, did anyone of you get the bonus MBA mini-course? My Knewton course doesn't seem to include it. Thanks.
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
whartonhereicome
I just bought the Knewton course. My OCD is acting up again so please bear with me. :lol: I can’t decide which schedule to take, the 2 times a week classes or the once a week classes. I’m also thinking of just creating my own schedule and watch the archived classes. IIRC, the 2 times a week session is about 1 ½ months long, while the once a week session is about 3 ½ months long.

I’ve been preparing for the last 2 ½ months already. For 2 ½ months I’ve read pretty good books like Sackmann’s Total Gmat Math, Powerscore’s CR bible and MGmat’s SC bible. These are solid books. I probably just need to read them again or at least review them.

Despite my preparation however, I scored very low in my Knewton diagnostic exam. (Q and V are both low, too embarrassed to mention right now :oops: ) I’m worried about regressing if I go with the once a week classes. I’ve read so much about the “law of diminishing returns” if I take my review beyond 3-4 months (something like that) or worse suffer burn out. On the other hand I might get information overload if I go with the 2 times a week classes. Has anyone tried either of the schedules I mentioned? How did you find them? Was it too hectic, too long or what have you? How about creating your own schedule and watching the archived classes? Has anyone tried this? Sorry for being too anal about it. :) I just can’t believe that I got a very low score in my Knewton diagnostic exam, since almost everybody here seems to find the questions easy or at least not particularly difficult. Well, I did find the question not particularly difficult also. In fact I finished about 25 minutes early in the verbal section and 5 minutes early in the quant section. I’m just surprised with my very low score. I tried to justify it by finding some excuses such as my lack of sleep (5 hrs.) and my carelessness. But excuses are just that, the real gmat won’t care.

Whew. It feels good to get it off my chest. At any rate thanks for reading my whinings. :lol: I just want to maximize my preparation without going overboard or regressing. My target gmat score is still 700 plus. Anyway, hopefully all of us get our target gmat scores. TIA

P.S. Just wondering, did anyone of you get the bonus MBA mini-course? My Knewton course doesn't seem to include it. Thanks.

I did not get the Mini-MBA course - I was wondering where that offer went.

As for schedule, I'd recommend the 2x/week if you can make the time for it. Once a week would be too slow in my opinion.
User avatar
nevergiveup
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Last visit: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 312
Kudos: 1,614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I asked knewton support about the Mini-course. They told me that the Mini course will be offered late in the summer, maybe in early August. You should receive an email about that one week prior to the course starting date.
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nevergiveup
I asked knewton support about the Mini-course. They told me that the Mini course will be offered late in the summer, maybe in early August. You should receive an email about that one week prior to the course starting date.

Awesome - thanks for sharing this.
User avatar
nevergiveup
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Last visit: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 312
Kudos: 1,614
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have just done knewton CAT#4

Total 690
Q 48 missed (#22, #32) both are DS questions. I finished with 20 minutes to spare. I did encounter a pretty tough question around #6, but I guessed right. Overall, the quantitative part is still kind of easier compare to the real one. The timing for the quant part is ok. Last time when I was in the test center for the real deal, I also finished the quant with around 15 minutes to spare.

V 35 missed (#3, #5, #15, #24, #31, #32) 1SC, 4RC, and 1CR. I guess my problem is RC for sure. I can't tell whether verbal is also easier than the real one. I think SC and CR are kind of easier than the real deal. I finished this section with 5 minutes to spare. This timing might be a little suspicious. I always seem to run out of time on GMATprep or the real one.

Overall, it is still great question for practice.

CAT#4 07/06/2009 at 10:30PM Q48 V35 T690
CAT#3 06/24/2009 at 10:49PM Q50 V26 T640
CAT#2 06/15/2009 at 10:18PM Q45 V41 T700
CAT#1 (diagnostic) 03/28/2009 at 11:02PM Q48 V31 T660

I think for me to get over 700, it will all depend on my luck on the verbal section.
User avatar
Av
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Last visit: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 884
Own Kudos:
303
 [1]
Given Kudos: 86
Status:Badgerine!
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 884
Kudos: 303
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPrep #1 Results

Score: 750 (Q49, V42)

It's too small of a sample size to declare a strong correlation between Knewton's CAT and GMATPrep, but I've received the same overall score on both exams.

Quant (Q49)
-Missed a total of 9 questions, six of which were Data Suff :(
-Had 2-3 stupid errors from not reading all of the details.

Verbal (V42)
-Missed a total of 6 questions (1RC, 2CR, 3SC)
-For the most part, the questions I missed were actually difficult. I need to finish MGMAT SC Guide and practice a bit more.
-I had one boldface CR question at #18.

Hopefully this data is useful for those of you who might be interested in the correlation between Knewton's CATs and GMATPrep.
avatar
s1ap
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Last visit: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 3
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

Thought I add my experience.

I am currently doing MGMAT and its not bad. But comparing to Knewton, it seems Knewton gives more direct teaching on where you are weak.

But comparing both the CATs from MGMAT and Knewton (I tried their trial), MGMAT seems to give a lower score. I scored about 620 for MGMAT, but scored 670 for Knewton.

Perhaps for people keen, go for the lessons with Knewton, but test yourself against MGMAT CATs.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9