GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Feb 2019, 14:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Valentine's day SALE is on! 25% off.

     February 18, 2019

     February 18, 2019

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    We don’t care what your relationship status this year - we love you just the way you are. AND we want you to crush the GMAT!
  • Get FREE Daily Quiz for 2 months

     February 18, 2019

     February 18, 2019

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Buy "All-In-One Standard ($149)", get free Daily quiz (2 mon). Coupon code : SPECIAL

Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 368
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 03 Feb 2019, 07:33
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

62% (01:27) correct 38% (01:39) wrong based on 237 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objectives on investments for meeting the future economy needs, and encouraged mature students to participate


A. will support federal objectives on investments for meeting the economy needs, and encouraged mature students to participate

B. can support federal objectives regarding the investments in meeting economy's future needs, and encourage older students for participation.

C. has supported federal objectives regarding investments in meeting the economy’s future needs and encouraged older students participation.

D. would support federal objectives regarding investment to meet the economy's future needs, and would encourage mature students to participate

E. could support federal objectives regarding investments to meet the economy's future needs and encourages older students to participate


"to meet the economy's future needs" is an adverbial modifier and requires a verb .The only present D and E is "would / could support ). Therefore the meaning is changed
In C, the scheme is new, then how could it already have supported?
In A, there is tense mismatch between "says" and encouraged"
In B "can" shows ability and there is no definite article before "economy's"
In D, would shows hypothetical.
In E , could indicates possibility

_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html


Originally posted by Zatarra on 24 Nov 2010, 22:05.
Last edited by Bunuel on 03 Feb 2019, 07:33, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 112
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2010, 23:30
1
I Choose D over E...Would support is better than could support according to me, but this is just my opinion...
I would select D.
IMO D
OA please?
_________________

Thanks,
VP

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4683
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 00:46
1
Between D and E, E misses parallelism by using the present tense -encourages - while the modal - would encourage - will make the construction a lot better. In addition, the use of - older - in E is badly chosen because intellectual matters such as participation in schemes is not age based. D is my choice
_________________

GMAT coaching under able guidance is only half expensive and time-consuming as a self-study in the final reckoning

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 27
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 01:13
1
mundasingh123 wrote:
Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objectives on investments for meeting the future economy needs, and encouraged mature students to participate

A. will support federal objectives on investments for meeting the economy needs, and encouraged mature students to participate

B. can support federal objectives regarding the investments in meeting economy's future needs, and encourage older students for participation.

C. has supported federal objectives regarding investments in meeting the economy’s future needs and encouraged older students participation.

D. would support federal objectives regarding investment to meet the economy's future needs, and would encourage mature students to participate

E. could support federal objectives regarding investments to meet the economy's future needs and encourages older students to participate

"to meet the economy's future needs" is an adverbial modifier and requires a verb .The only present D and E is "would / could support ). Therefore the meaning is changed
In C, the scheme is new, then how could it already have supported?
In A, there is tense mismatch between "says" and encouraged"
In B "can" shows ability and there is no definite article before "economy's"



I'd Go for B with this - As per the intent the sentence has to be in present tense . and B is the only choice which does that well .
_________________

This time , its my time .

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 368
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 01:49
daagh wrote:
Between D and E, E misses parallelism by using the present tense -encourages - while the modal - would encourage - will make the construction a lot better. In addition, the use of - older - in E is badly chosen because intellectual matters such as participation in schemes is not age based. D is my choice

I agree with you on the use of older.
But E does maintain parallelism because the subject is knowledge international and agrees with the word "encourages ".Isnt "would reserved for hypothetic events.
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 187
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 02:11
1
yes - one use of "would" is for hypos --- this is a hypo --- the "new scheme" is going to do something, so it is unreal in that sense

in E there is no comma before "and" - you need a comma before an "and" if it is joining two separate clauses.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 368
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 02:18
gmat1011 wrote:
yes - one use of "would" is for hypos --- this is a hypo --- the "new scheme" is going to do something, so it is unreal in that sense

in E there is no comma before "and" - you need a comma before an "and" if it is joining two separate clauses.

What abt D?
Nones commenting on "investment/investments to verb/in verbing
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 187
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 02:25
1
"Investment" can be used that way... investment to meet... needs seems fine to me

The broad agenda for the Prime Minister's emergency meeting was related to foreign investment in the country.

You don't have to say foreign "investments" though it is pretty unlikely that it will just be one 'investment'
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 368
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 02:31
gmat1011 wrote:
"Investment" can be used that way... investment to meet... needs seems fine to me

The broad agenda for the Prime Minister's emergency meeting was related to foreign investment in the country.

You don't have to say foreign "investments" though it is pretty unlikely that it will just be one 'investment'

to verb is an adverbial modifier and needs a verb to modify.In D and E the only verb is support
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 187
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 02:47
so what is your conclusion? support X.... to meet Y is a valid formulation. Just googled and found this on a Canadian government website:

We therefore recommend that dedicated funding be made available to support organizations to meet AODA compliance standards.
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 368
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 03:07
gmat1011 wrote:
so what is your conclusion? support X.... to meet Y is a valid formulation. Just googled and found this on a Canadian government website:

We therefore recommend that dedicated funding be made available to support organizations to meet AODA compliance standards.

To meet economy's needs is an infinitive and modifies a verb."to support" modifies made available and to meet modifies to support.
I think Dand E are wrong because of misplaced modifier also.Need expert to corroborate
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2009
Posts: 51
Location: Astoria, NYC
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 09:14
1
what is OA? I am chose ans:D...it was between D/E. E throws this older people statement into the sentence.
does investments need to be plural or singular?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 5
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2010, 18:40
I also think it is D, but i am not sure about the use of needs.
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Posts: 200
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2010, 17:22
daagh wrote:
Between D and E, E misses parallelism by using the present tense -encourages - while the modal - would encourage - will make the construction a lot better. In addition, the use of - older - in E is badly chosen because intellectual matters such as participation in schemes is not age based. D is my choice


Can you clarify one two points

1) why B is wrong here

B. can support federal objectives regarding the investments in meeting economy's future needs, and encourage older students for participation.

2) In the option b, do we require to repeat to be - can after comma and 'and' conjunction or can we take placement of 'can' implied before the verb encourage ? because if the repition is necessary then the same sentence has two different tenses within
_________________

http://www.gmatpill.com/gmat-practice-test/

Amazing Platform

VP
VP
User avatar
P
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1121
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2010, 22:00
1
hirendhanak wrote:

1) why B is wrong here



B is not correct on multiple counts:

1. B uses encourage. We can interpret this in two ways:

a. …its new scheme will support X and (its new scheme) encourage Y. This is not correct construction, since you would expect the verb to be encourages (since scheme is singular).

b. …its new scheme can support X and (can) encourage Y. The issue here is more of logic. When Knowledge International (or anyone else for that matter) says something about its (own) scheme, can comes out as too in-definitive and non-committal a statement (think about it: Fed says its measures can improve US economy).

2. Changes the meaning of the original sentence, since older is not the same as mature.

p.s. I would strongly encourage test takers to not interpret would as hypothetical usage. For example, I will become a pilot is a correct usage, though at this point of time, it is still hypothetical (whether I finally end up becoming a pilot or not).

The best way to interpret would is when one talks about future from past perspective. In this case, Knowledge International said in the past (sentence, due to its typical construction, uses says, but this act of saying clearly occurred sometime in the past) something about future (that its scheme in future will do X and Y). Hence, would is the most appropriate usage here.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Orion Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 350
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2010, 11:01
2
1
Hey guys,

Thank you for the invitation to chime in! I'll throw my support for choice D here, as well. A few big-picture problems with some of the choices include:

-The use of "encouraged" in A and C - this "new scheme" doesn't call for a past-tense verb. At its most retroactive, you'd use the present perfect "has encouraged" to indicate that it's still ongoing, but a straight past-tense verb isn't correct here.

-"investments in meeting" or "investments for meeting" in choices A, B, and C are poorly phrased - that present-tense verb isn't really anything you can invest in, so in order to use a verb you really need to use the "to meet" infinitive form.

-"could" and "can" (E and B) aren't really good uses of business writing. As far as meaning goes, they're not something that a company like Knowledge Int'l would ever make an official statement on. "Will" and "Would" are better - they predict that something will happen instead of saying "maybe" or "it might". It's a subtle thing but I've seen the "nobody knows" forms of "can", "could", "maybe" come up and in contexts like these I haven't ever seen them be correct.

-Between D and E, E isn't really a pure parallelism error, as you could reverse the two verbs and it would be okay: "the program encourages older students and could support federal objectives". In that case, one thing is definitely true ("encourages") and the other is potentially true ("could support"), so the meaning is correct. But in the reverse order, as E is written, the conditional comes first making an awkward meaning "could support...and encourages" - the "could" really should control both verbs, and in this case that makes the second half illogical (you can't have "could" with an indicative form like "encourages").

I hope that helps...

One other point - I don't think that the GMAT would use "mature" vs. "older" in an official question as this question does...that seems to be a word-choice smokescreen that I haven't really seen them do. And 'investments" vs. "investment" - they're two different meanings but I think that both are appropriate here. "Investments" refers to specific levels or quantities of investments (e.g. "the government wants investments totaling $500 million"), whereas "investment" is the overall entity or idea. I don't think either is particularly wrong or right here.
_________________

Brian

Curriculum Developer, Instructor, and Host of Veritas Prep On Demand

Save $100 on live Veritas Prep GMAT Courses and Admissions Consulting

Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2010
Posts: 1
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2010, 11:02
it is d and in b the idiom encourage for is wrong
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 92
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jul 2012, 11:30
I have a question here, if in the option A if the answer choice did not make the parallelism error and did have will support...and [will] encourage.. would it then be correct?

In case yes, then what makes us select would/will or the vice versa?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2012
Posts: 23
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2012, 09:43
Can anybody tell me when to use "could" and when to use "would" with examples ? It's really confusing me :(
Thanks in advance.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Posts: 138
Reviews Badge
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2019, 07:26
Hi GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo, aragonn, sudarshan22, generis, hazelnut, Vyshak Bunuel

Could you please add OA to the question and also provide answer for below question if possible as I also get confused sometime between would, could and should.

Desperate123 wrote:
Can anybody tell me when to use "could" and when to use "would" with examples ? It's really confusing me :(
Thanks in advance.

_________________

______________________________
Press +1 Kudos if my post helped you a little and help me to ulcock the tests ;) Wish you all success

I'd appreciate learning about the grammatical errors in my posts


Please let me know if I'm wrong somewhere :-)

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2019, 07:26

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Knowledge International says its new scheme will support federal objec

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.