Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 22:52 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 22:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,325
 [14]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Nmba2021
Joined: 14 Jun 2019
Last visit: 16 May 2022
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
28
 [6]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: Johnson '21
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.54
Products:
Schools: Johnson '21
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 155
Kudos: 28
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
MofeBhatia
Joined: 29 Nov 2018
Last visit: 04 May 2020
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
135
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 60
Kudos: 135
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument given?

(A) the restaurant market in Tritonaville is fiercely competitive with a large number of good restaurants of many cuisines, making it hard for all of them to remain solvent
(B) some of the cooking methods used for certain specific types of seafood food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in most other cuisines
(C) national studies have indicated that, in the wake of a food poisoning scare, restaurant visits typically fall, especially at restaurants of the same cuisine as the original incident
(D) certain types of commercial fishing vessels can be considerably more unsanitary than most other commercial vessels responsible for food transport
(E) these eleven restaurants have incurred legal fees defending themselves against unfounded imitative claims

The right answer is E. What we are looking for is an explanation for why other restaurants might be in trouble, which has been impacted by this particular event.

A - This is tempting, but this situation already existed. The food poisoning case doesn't change the situation, so this doesn't follow from the premises of the argument. OUT

B - This actually hurts the argument! OUT

C - This is tempting too, but we already know that this DIDN'T happen. OUT

D - This is totally unrelated. OUT

E - This actually makes sense because it offers an explanation for why the restaurants are struggling despite high patronage.

- Matoo
User avatar
shubham2312
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Last visit: 20 Oct 2021
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,962
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.1
Products:
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
Posts: 84
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nikita1997
I don't get this solution. The question says other, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits
; which should mean other than the 11 restaurants. How is this some other referring to those 11 only......
yup same question and just because of this reason i marked Option A
avatar
Vishalmechie
Joined: 09 Dec 2018
Last visit: 18 Jul 2019
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument talks about profit going down means it should be related to sales or cost of operating.

Between C and E, I would go for C because C gives a reason for other than the 11 restaurants. Can someone pls explain why this thought process is wrong. Also, how does the “other” refer to the 11 restaurants?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
aggvipul
Joined: 15 Nov 2017
Last visit: 13 Apr 2022
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 28
Status:Current Student
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
WE:Operations (Retail: E-commerce)
Posts: 229
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="dcummins"]Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

dcummins buddy pls remove "other"(highlighted) from the prompt, this is rendering to whole lot of churn here
avatar
Ketakindu123
Joined: 12 Oct 2017
Last visit: 20 Jul 2019
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the question clearly mentions " the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them." How can the other restaurants land up in legal trouble.
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
2,325
 [1]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aggvipul
dcummins
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

dcummins buddy pls remove "other"(highlighted) from the prompt, this is rendering to whole lot of churn here


Not sure what you're talking about.. nothing is highlighted. You highlighted "other" in your own quote dude.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nikita1997
I don't get this solution. The question says other, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits
; which should mean other than the 11 restaurants. How is this some other referring to those 11 only......

Hi Nikita,

" Other " is not referring to the 11 seafood restaurants. "Other" is referring to the restaurants excluding those 11.
User avatar
Hea234ven
Joined: 12 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Sep 2021
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 678
Status:No knowledge goes waste
Location: Norway
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.3
WE:Corporate Finance (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 72
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But in E, it is stated that the 11 restaurants (which are in good position because of patronship), it is not stated that restaurants other than these are facing problems..
avatar
RITESH24
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Last visit: 24 Jan 2025
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Schools:
GMAT 1: 530 Q44 V19
Schools:
GMAT 1: 530 Q44 V19
Posts: 28
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
other restaurants here imply restaurants other than those 11, but in the explanation it says that those 11 restaurants were suffering from profit decline. what i understood was that there are some other restaurants other than those in Triton .............. this is so confusing!! please explain
User avatar
AkshdeepS
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Last visit: 07 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,436
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,002
Status:It's near - I can see.
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GPA: 3.01
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Products:
Posts: 1,436
Kudos: 1,884
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dcummins
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument given?

(A) the restaurant market in Tritonaville is fiercely competitive with a large number of good restaurants of many cuisines, making it hard for all of them to remain solvent
(B) some of the cooking methods used for certain specific types of seafood food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in most other cuisines
(C) national studies have indicated that, in the wake of a food poisoning scare, restaurant visits typically fall, especially at restaurants of the same cuisine as the original incident
(D) certain types of commercial fishing vessels can be considerably more unsanitary than most other commercial vessels responsible for food transport
(E) these eleven restaurants have incurred legal fees defending themselves against unfounded imitative claims

Though not a very strong contender, Option E is the only choice better than others.
Option A is wrong as this situation is already in place, and also it does not connect to food poisoning case.
avatar
Vakru
Joined: 26 Jan 2018
Last visit: 12 Aug 2024
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 198
Location: India
Posts: 23
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EpilepticLearner
Joined: 24 Feb 2019
Last visit: 03 Feb 2020
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 73
Posts: 44
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The stimulus is ambiguous but the "other" has to refer to those 10 restaurants to make logical sense.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shubham2312
Nikita1997
I don't get this solution. The question says other, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits
; which should mean other than the 11 restaurants. How is this some other referring to those 11 only......
yup same question and just because of this reason i marked Option A

It refers to the same set of 'other restaurants' from the 11. Since it says "some of *the* other seafood..." it means that this refers to the same set of other spoken about, not just any other ones.

The part that is paradoxical is, how can it be the case that with high patronage, restaurants are still shutting down. A does not work because even before the woman reported the food poisoning, this competitive situation already existed, and there was no significant drop in profits. What we want is some explanation of how this situation could have caused an impact, even though the impact was not direct.

- Matoo
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vishalmechie
The argument talks about profit going down means it should be related to sales or cost of operating.

Between C and E, I would go for C because C gives a reason for other than the 11 restaurants. Can someone pls explain why this thought process is wrong. Also, how does the “other” refer to the 11 restaurants?

Posted from my mobile device

The mistake here is that we know that this did NOT happen at *the* other restaurants. Maybe usually visitation tends to go down, but we are told in the premises here that visitation remained the same. Therefore, as you said, it has to be related to operating costs. Fighting frivolous legal battles is an operating cost that went up, thereby explaining the profit drops.

The operative word is *the* other, so we are talking about a specific set of 'other' that was already mentioned before, it can only be about these 11.

- Matoo
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ketakindu123
the question clearly mentions " the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them." How can the other restaurants land up in legal trouble.

That is exactly the point. They are ending up in legal trouble because of frivolous lawsuits. Without having done something wrong, they have more cases filed against them. This increases costs and therefore causes them to go bankrupt despite having patronage.

- Matoo
avatar
dhanushecho
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Last visit: 22 Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Problem with OA

Here , the statement "no other CASE of food poisoning has been documented" ,would indicate that there where no other cases of food poisoning , whether frivolous or not. The use of the word "CASE" can encompass both true example of something or an event that later turned out be true/false. I can,for example have a case of food poisoning that is still in court , and whose truth is still subject to debate, such events can still be documented as cases(an event whose truth is subject to debate) of food poisoning.

CASE meaning :- a particular situation or an example of something.

Normal course of events

A person complains that he has food poisoning.(event take place)
The person approaches the court that views this as a CASE.
Here the incident in itself is enough to warrant the use of the word 'CASE'.

Ordinary usage
Numerous cases of theft where documented, which later turned out to be false.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
monkinaferrari
Joined: 04 Aug 2022
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 305
Products:
Posts: 31
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackverbalGMAT
Quote:
Last year, a woman was able to demonstrate that she contracted a bad case of food poisoning from a meal at one seafood restaurant in Tritonaville, and she successfully sued the restaurant for a large sum of money. The story was popular in the town, and the size of the financial settlement made the national news. Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them. Nevertheless, some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close. This is not surprising, though, because _____________.

Which of the following most logically completes the argument given?

(A) the restaurant market in Tritonaville is fiercely competitive with a large number of good restaurants of many cuisines, making it hard for all of them to remain solvent
(B) some of the cooking methods used for certain specific types of seafood food are less likely to kill germs than are the cooking methods used in most other cuisines
(C) national studies have indicated that, in the wake of a food poisoning scare, restaurant visits typically fall, especially at restaurants of the same cuisine as the original incident
(D) certain types of commercial fishing vessels can be considerably more unsanitary than most other commercial vessels responsible for food transport
(E) these eleven restaurants have incurred legal fees defending themselves against unfounded imitative claims

The right answer is E. What we are looking for is an explanation for why other restaurants might be in trouble, which has been impacted by this particular event.

A - This is tempting, but this situation already existed. The food poisoning case doesn't change the situation, so this doesn't follow from the premises of the argument. OUT

B - This actually hurts the argument! OUT

C - This is tempting too, but we already know that this DIDN'T happen. OUT

D - This is totally unrelated. OUT

E - This actually makes sense because it offers an explanation for why the restaurants are struggling despite high patronage.

- Matoo

Since that case, patronship at this and the ten other seafood restaurants in Tritonaville has remained high, and no other case of food poisoning has been documented at any of them.

some of the other seafood restaurants have experienced a severe drop in profits, so much so that one restaurant was forced to close.


How can a restaurant has high visit and is colosed at the same time?
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts