Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current

A)The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
>> Not related.
(B)Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
>> Yes. This explains the reasom for last year's inflation rate and also mentions 4 percent is the stable level. And so it weakens the argument that the inflation is increasing.
(C)Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
>> Supports the argument.
(D)The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10-year low.
>> This shows 1.2 is the 10 year low, but do not say if 4 is a higher value of an average value.
(E)Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.
>> Not related.

Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

We need an AC which can tell us that this increment in inflation from 1.2% to 4% will not increase further.

(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data.
whatever data is taken; this AC is not weakening the conclusion.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
Correct- this shows that the inflation went down to 1.2% due to oil price fall but regained to 4% , which is the stable annual rate.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
not weakening;strengthening - incorrect
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low.
doesn't signify anything about the further increase of inflation above 4%-incorrect
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.
out of scope

The 4% is used to suggest that inflation is growing. After all, if the inflation rate was 1.2% in the previous year, then surely that must be the case. However, if the 1.2% represented a lower inflation rate than usual, then an inflation rate of 4% cannot be used as evidence that inflation is an upward trend.

(A) nails this point and elaborates even further by stating that the usual inflation rate is 4%. Therefore, an inflation rate of 4% is a return to business as usual, not a sign of an upward trend in inflation.

I almost understood the reasoning completely.
My only doubt is with option D, " if all the years before last year the rate of inflation was more than 1.2% or lets say if it was stable 4%, and it dropped to 1.2% for just one year. Subsequently, the rate became stable again as 4% , so doesn't it mean that there is no upward trend ?"

Hi nitin

You have a very good question.

There would be no upward trend, if only last year inflation rate dropped to 1.2%. Because:

(1) The conclusion is " inflation is on upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year". If the next year the inflation rate will be stable at 4%, you CANNOT conclude that the inflation is on upward trend, and the rate will be still higher.

(2) If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

Hope it's clear.

If you base only on data of two years (last year and current year) to conclude the upward trend, why don't you conclude the downward trend for the last year and the year before last year (4% ==> 2%). Hence, your conclusion is not strong enough to conclude the inflation is on upward trend.

doesnt this mean it is also actually weakining the conclusion of upward trend

Hi adg142000

This is just an example I used to clarify nitin's doubt about option D. Before answer your question, I just want to clarify D a bit.

D says: "The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low".
Thus, the inflation rates pattern should be: HIGH (the year before last year) ==> LOW (last year) ==> HIGH (current year).

I used my example to show: if we use only data from last year to current year to conclude inflation is on upward trend ==> we could be wrong. Because if we use data from the year before last year to last year ==> we can also conclude inflation is on downward trend.

Your question is: does the second part (conclusion about downward trend) actually weaken the main conclusion? If it does, D may be right?

I would say no, the second part of my example just shows the comparison used in the stimulus is invalid. Because if can say the inflation is on upward by using only data of two years, we can also conclude the inflation is on downward by using data from other two years. The reverse pattern is also true, if we use only data from two years to conclude inflation is on downward (It is your inquiry), we can also use data from last year to current year to weaken the "new" conclusion (inflation is on downward). In short, D is not strong enough to weaken the main conclusion, because it's half right, half wrong.

Hope it clears your doubt.

I will try explaining this one!!!!

Conclusion: inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Assumption: Inflation will always have a pattern
There are no unusual things happened to say that inflation rate will change

(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data. - Irrelevant information
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent. - Weakener Says that Last year dip in Oil price brought the inflation down to 1.2 from stable point of 4. So same stable inflation point will be maintained unless there is no unusual dip in oil price, or....
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation. - No point to say there will be increase in the Pay next year
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a ten-year low. - irrelevant - 10 years low inflation says nothing about the next year rate of inflation
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree - Again this has nothing to do with the next year inflation rate

Correct me if i am wrong.

OFFICIAL GMAT EXPLANATION


Argument Evaluation

Situation_____________The rate of inflation was 1.2 percent last year but is 4 percent in the current year. It is therefore expected to rise above 4 percent next year.

Reasoning___________What point most weakens this conclusion?[/i] The conclusion is based on an upward trend that is derived from data for two years. Data from only two years provide rather weak evidence of a trend. Additional evidence that provides a context for the annual inflation rates during the most recent two-year period will promote a more solid evaluation of this prediction of next year’s inflation rate. If inflation has recently been stable at 4 percent, and the temporary drop the previous year is accounted for by lower oil prices, then the basis for the prediction seems quite weak.

A As long as the sample was representative, the figures should be accurate. This point does not weaken the conclusion.

B Correct. This statement suggests that the 1.2 percent inflation rate is an unusual occurrence in recent years. Especially because the dip below the stable 4 percent rate was temporary, this unusual occurrence cannot be used as the basis for predicting a trend.

C This statement explains one process by which inflation increases and tends to support the conclusion that inflation will continue to rise.

D This information implies, for example, that two years ago, the inflation rate was higher than 1.2 percent. This raises the possibility (without stating it) that last year and the year preceding mark a trend of declining inflation (and that the current year’s 4 percent is an aberration). However, if the inflation rate two years ago was only slightly higher than 1.2 percent (for example, 1.25 percent), then it would be difficult to regard these two numbers as signaling a trend of declining inflation. We do not have enough information here to regard this as a significant weakener. The information is sufficient to justify a little doubt about the argument’s conclusion—but not at all specific enough to undermine the argument’s conclusion as much as does (B).

E The failure of government intervention to affect the rate of inflation could be seen to support, not weaken, the conclusion.

Inflation will be in upward trend if all data points are in equal and comparable years. LY could be low due to some special reason - Hence B - Temporary dip.

Last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?

Question type: Weaken the argument

Conclusion: Inflation is on an upward trend and the inflation rate will be higher next year.

Task at hand: Find an option that shows that inflation is not necessarily on an upward trend and the inflation rate will not necessarily be higher next year

A. The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than all of the available data. Details of the sample that was taken into consideration will not help us show that that inflation is not necessarily on an upward trend

B. Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent. This option is telling us that the stable annual level is 4 percent. This means that the rate of 1.2% is an exception. In other words, at the most, the rate the following year will go back to the recent stable. This shows that inflation is not necessarily on an upward trend.

C. Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation. This option is saying that there will be further inflation. Strengthens.

D. The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10-year low. This means that the rate could go high or low after this. Doesn’t weaken or strengthen.

E. Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree. This may be true, but this doesn’t help us show that that inflation is not necessarily on an upward trend.

- Nitha Jay

Hi,

I read the above posts, but still

I have issues with choices A and B.

To me, A seems like a classical weakner- doubting on the data (sample), suggesting that last year or this year's inflation could be inaccurate--> maybe its a downward trend, maybe inflation is stable--> therefore a good weakner!

In B --> last year dip was temporary and this years inflation is stable--> oil price could fall again or rise again, we don't know, trend could be upward or downward--> chances are we could se downward more likely.--> I do say its a weakner.

but A, can't be eliminated with 100% confidence. so its like a 50-50% situation,which will take extra time on the actual exam or a lucky guess.

Here's the exact wording of (A):

The key to eliminating (A) is that the data sample is called "representative," which implies that it was a GOOD representation of all available data. If (A) said the sample was "unrepresentative," then (A) would weaken the argument. As written, though, (A) does not cast doubt on the validity of data sample, or the conclusion drawn from that data.

As for (B), you're right that it doesn't PROVE what will happen with the inflation rate next year. It does, however, give us reason to believe that last year's low inflation was a one-off event, instead of a trend that will continue into the new year.

(B) is the correct answer.

I hope that helps!

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.