GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 01 Apr 2020, 04:29

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 23 Jul 2012
Posts: 37
GPA: 3.9
Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 21:03
4
38
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

25% (01:53) correct 75% (02:01) wrong based on 297 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7. How many terms are there in S?

(1) The sum of the terms in set S is 105.
(2) The standard deviation of set S is equal to 3.5
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62448
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 21:43
12
18
Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7. How many terms are there in S?

(1) The sum of the terms in set S is 105. Clearly insufficient. For example, consider S={28, 35, 42} and {49, 56}.

(2) The standard deviation of set S is equal to 3.5. Important property: if we add or subtract a constant to each term in a set SD will not change. From this it follows, that:

Any set with two consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7}, {7, 14}, {14, 21}, {21, 28}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
Any set with three consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7, 14}, {7, 14, 21}, {14, 21, 28}, {21, 28, 35}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
Any set with four consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7, 14, 21}, {7, 14, 21, 28}, {14, 21, 28, 35}, {21, 28, 35, 42}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
...

We know the standard deviation of S is 3.5. We CAN get the standard deviations of {0, 7}, {0, 7, 14}, {0, 7, 14, 21}, ... Only one of them will have the standard deviation of 3.5. So, we can get how many terms are there in the set. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________
General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2013
Posts: 18
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 07:53
Can you post a link for tips on Standard Deviations? I'm a baby with S.D's! :/
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62448
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 07:57
fra wrote:
Can you post a link for tips on Standard Deviations? I'm a baby with S.D's! :/

Theory on SD: math-standard-deviation-87905.html

Check Standard Deviation Questions in our Special Questions Directory.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Director
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 812
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Fisher '19 (M\$)
GPA: 3.71
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Oct 2016, 00:37
Bunuel wrote:
Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7. How many terms are there in S?

(1) The sum of the terms in set S is 105. Clearly insufficient. For example, consider S={28, 35, 42} and {49, 56}.

(2) The standard deviation of set S is equal to 3.5. Important property: if we add or subtract a constant to each term in a set SD will not change. From this it follows, that:

Any set with two consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7}, {7, 14}, {14, 21}, {21, 28}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
Any set with three consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7, 14}, {7, 14, 21}, {14, 21, 28}, {21, 28, 35}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
Any set with four consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7, 14, 21}, {7, 14, 21, 28}, {14, 21, 28, 35}, {21, 28, 35, 42}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
...

We know the standard deviation of S is 3.5. We CAN get the standard deviations of {0, 7}, {0, 7, 14}, {0, 7, 14, 21}, ... Only one of them will have the standard deviation of 3.5. So, we can get how many terms are there in the set. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel One question,how are we sure that one set of consecutive numbers of multiple of 7 will have 3.5 as the S.D. Can't this be the case that none of the sets of multiples of 7 will have a S.D. of 3.5?

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62448
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Oct 2016, 01:00
1
1
Keats wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7. How many terms are there in S?

(1) The sum of the terms in set S is 105. Clearly insufficient. For example, consider S={28, 35, 42} and {49, 56}.

(2) The standard deviation of set S is equal to 3.5. Important property: if we add or subtract a constant to each term in a set SD will not change. From this it follows, that:

Any set with two consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7}, {7, 14}, {14, 21}, {21, 28}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
Any set with three consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7, 14}, {7, 14, 21}, {14, 21, 28}, {21, 28, 35}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
Any set with four consecutive multiples of 7 will have the same standard deviation. For example, ..., {0, 7, 14, 21}, {7, 14, 21, 28}, {14, 21, 28, 35}, {21, 28, 35, 42}, ... will have the same standard deviation.
...

We know the standard deviation of S is 3.5. We CAN get the standard deviations of {0, 7}, {0, 7, 14}, {0, 7, 14, 21}, ... Only one of them will have the standard deviation of 3.5. So, we can get how many terms are there in the set. Sufficient.

Hope it's clear.

Bunuel One question,how are we sure that one set of consecutive numbers of multiple of 7 will have 3.5 as the S.D. Can't this be the case that none of the sets of multiples of 7 will have a S.D. of 3.5?

On the GMAT, two data sufficiency statements always provide TRUE information and these statements NEVER contradict each other or the stem. Hence if it's said that there is such a set then there must be.

FYI, ..., {0, 7}, {7, 14}, {14, 21}, {21, 28}, ... have the SD of 3.5.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2017
Posts: 117
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Dec 2018, 00:17
Bunuel
cant this be the case that sets consisting of different numbers of consecutive multiples of 7 can still have the same SD as 3.5? For example a set of 3 consecutive multiples of 7 has SD=3.5 and so has another set consisting of may be 4 or 2 consecutive multiples of 7(more spread out bothways).

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 62448
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Dec 2018, 00:26
Debashis Roy wrote:
Bunuel
cant this be the case that sets consisting of different numbers of consecutive multiples of 7 can still have the same SD as 3.5? For example a set of 3 consecutive multiples of 7 has SD=3.5 and so has another set consisting of may be 4 or 2 consecutive multiples of 7(more spread out bothways).

No.

More elements you add to a set of consecutive multiples, more widespread it becomes, thus larger SD you get. For example:

The standard deviation of {0, 7} = 3.5
The standard deviation of {0, 7, 14} = ~5,7
The standard deviation of {0, 7, 14, 21} = ~7.8
The standard deviation of {0, 7, 14, 21, 28} = ~9.9
_________________
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14448
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jan 2020, 01:44
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Let S be a finite set of consecutive multiples of 7.   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2020, 01:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by