Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 30

Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jun 2010, 10:13
2
This post received KUDOS
18
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
57% (02:42) correct 43% (03:37) wrong based on 166 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He explains to the police officer that he could not afford to be late today, and has arrived at work only four minutes before he is to start. The officer explains that if Liam had driven 5mph slower for his whole commute, he would have arrived at work exactly on time. If Liam's commute is 30 miles long,how fast was he actually driving?(Assume that Liam drove at a constant speed for the duration of his commute.) A. 50 mph B. 45 mph C. 48 mph D. 52 mph E. 60 mph OA: Solution:Of the many ways to solve this problem, two are as follows:
(Method 1) Assume the actual speed of Liam to be r. Distance travelled is 30 miles. So, time taken is 30/r. In the hypothetical case, speed of Liam is (r5). Distance remains the same. So, time taken is (30/r)+(1/15) because 4 minutes is 1/15th hour. So, translating these values into equations, the hypothetical scenario becomes:
distance = speed * time 30 = [(30/r)+(1/15)]*[r5] => 30 = [(450+r)/15r]*[r5] => 450r = [450+r][r5] => r^2 5r2250 = 0 => (r50)(r+45) = 0 => r = 50.
(Method 2) This is the method used in the Manhattan guide. Speed in the actual case is considered to be (r+5). Time taken is therefore 30/(r+5). Speed in the hypothetical case is considered to be r. Time taken is 30/r. Because we know time taken in the hypothetical scenario is 4 minutes more, 30/r = [(30/(r+5))+(1/15)] => 30/r = [((450+r+5)/(15r+75)] => 30(15r+75) = r(455+r) => r^2 +5r2250 = 0 => (r+50)(r45) = 0 => r=45.
Can anyone please explain to me why both these methods DON'T yield the same answer? Isn't the first method more appropriate because the hypothetical scenario is the one in which we should assume the speed to be 5mph less than the actual and time taken is 4 minutes more than the actual?
Thanks.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



CEO
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2748
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31 GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jun 2010, 10:35
1
This post received KUDOS
Phoenix9 wrote: Hi All,
I have a question regarding a problem from Manhattan Strategy Guide: Word Translations (3). Chapter 2. Rates. Page 37.
Problem: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He explains to the police officer that he could not afford to be late today, and has arrived at work only four minutes before he is to start. The officer explains that if Liam had driven 5mph slower for his whole commute, he would have arrived at work exactly on time. If Liam's commute is 30 miles long,how fast was he actually driving?(Assume that Liam drove at a constant speed for the duration of his commute.)
Solution: Of the many ways to solve this problem, two are as follows:
(Method 1) Assume the actual speed of Liam to be r. Distance travelled is 30 miles. So, time taken is 30/r. In the hypothetical case, speed of Liam is (r5). Distance remains the same. So, time taken is (30/r)+(1/15) because 4 minutes is 1/15th hour. So, translating these values into equations, the hypothetical scenario becomes:
distance = speed * time 30 = [(30/r)+(1/15)]*[r5] => 30 = [(450+r)/15r]*[r5] => 450r = [450+r][r5] => r^2 5r2250 = 0 => (r50)(r+45) = 0 => r = 50.
(Method 2) This is the method used in the Manhattan guide. Speed in the actual case is considered to be (r+5). Time taken is therefore 30/(r+5). Speed in the hypothetical case is considered to be r. Time taken is 30/r. Because we know time taken in the hypothetical scenario is 4 minutes more, 30/r = [(30/(r+5))+(1/15)] => 30/r = [((450+r+5)/(15r+75)] => 30(15r+75) = r(455+r) => r^2 +5r2250 = 0 => (r+50)(r45) = 0 => r=45.
Can anyone please explain to me why both these methods DON'T yield the same answer? Isn't the first method more appropriate because the hypothetical scenario is the one in which we should assume the speed to be 5mph less than the actual and time taken is 4 minutes more than the actual?
Thanks. Check the blue quoted. Actual speed = r+5 where r = 45 => r+5 = 50 same answer.
_________________
Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal lets give it a fight
Money Saved is the Money Earned
Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal
Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings
Gmat test review : http://gmatclub.com/forum/670to710alongjourneywithoutdestinationstillhappy141642.html



Intern
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 30

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jun 2010, 10:45
My bad. Was dumb enough to ignore the (r+5) part. Thanks though



Manager
Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 133

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2011, 09:22
Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work. He explains that he could not afford to be late today, and has arrived at work only 5 minutes before he is to start. The officer explains that if he had driven 5mph slower for his whole commute, he would have arrived on time. If his commute is 30 miles, how fast was he actually driving?
What is wrong with the way I'm trying to solve this problem?
Actual: Speed = s time = t  1/12
Hypothetical: Speed = s5 time = t
Since distances are equal, equate the two. I cannot seem to get the correct answer...Please help.



Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 594

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2011, 11:30



TOEFL Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1590
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2011, 18:31
@Baten80, the answer is 45, as we have to find the speed on that day.
_________________
Formula of Life > Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 1945

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2011, 21:59
subhashghosh wrote: @Baten80, the answer is 45, as we have to find the speed on that day. Thus, it should be 50mph, right?
_________________
~fluke
GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 76
Location: Tennessee
Schools: Belmont University

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2011, 10:26
Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work. He explains to the police officer that he could not afford to be late today, and has arrived at work only four minutes before he is to start. The officer explains that if Liam had driven 5 mph slower for his whole commute, he would have arrived at work exactly on time. If Liam's commute is 30 miles long, how fast was he actually driving? (Assume that Liam drove at a constant speed for the duration of his commute.) A. 50 mph B. 45 mph C. 48 mph D. 52 mph E. 60 mph



Intern
Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Posts: 12

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2011, 12:11
1
This post received KUDOS
Let t be the number of hours he would need to reach office on time.
when he is driving with over speed, he reached office 4 min earlier! so the equation for this is s(t  4/60) = 30
where s is the speed and 30 is the distance.
if he decreases his speed by 5mph then he would have reached his office on time: (s5)t = 30
if you solve above equations, you will arrive at t = 2/3 hr and s = 50mph
therefore answer is A



Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 76
Location: Tennessee
Schools: Belmont University

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2011, 21:13
Shalom vrk002, Shalom! I like your method the best because of its simplicity. However, could you post the step whereby you solve both equations? The only way I see that I could get the answer by using your method is plugging in all the possible answers until I see the one that is the solution.



Intern
Joined: 24 May 2011
Posts: 19

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jun 2011, 01:50
1
This post received KUDOS
s(t  4/60) = 30  (1) (s5)t = 30  (2) Therefore t = 30 /(s5) substitute t in (2)
s[(30/(s5))  (1/15)] = 30 => s[ (450  s + 5) / (15(s5)) ] = 30 => 450s  s^2 + 5s = 450s  2250 => s^2  5s  2250 = 0; => s^2  50s + 45s  2250 = 0 => (s  50) ( s + 45) = 0 => s = 50; s = 45 Speed cant be negative therefore s = 50.



Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2011
Posts: 123
Schools: Columbia

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2011, 07:00
plugging the numbers would be much faster, sometimes, especially if you can't intuitively guess that 2250 = 45*50
Just solve to 30/s + 1/15 = 30(s5) and plug in the options. Its much much faster. In this case you have to be careful for whether u use s5 or s+5. The latter can't be used cause you're searching for the faster speed.



Current Student
Joined: 13 Sep 2014
Posts: 13
Location: China
Concentration: General Management, Operations

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Nov 2014, 21:49
Phoenix9 wrote: Hi All,
I have a question regarding a problem from Manhattan Strategy Guide: Word Translations (3). Chapter 2. Rates. Page 37.
Problem: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He explains to the police officer that he could not afford to be late today, and has arrived at work only four minutes before he is to start. The officer explains that if Liam had driven 5mph slower for his whole commute, he would have arrived at work exactly on time. If Liam's commute is 30 miles long,how fast was he actually driving?(Assume that Liam drove at a constant speed for the duration of his commute.)
Solution: Of the many ways to solve this problem, two are as follows:
(Method 1) Assume the actual speed of Liam to be r. Distance travelled is 30 miles. So, time taken is 30/r. In the hypothetical case, speed of Liam is (r5). Distance remains the same. So, time taken is (30/r)+(1/15) because 4 minutes is 1/15th hour. So, translating these values into equations, the hypothetical scenario becomes:
distance = speed * time 30 = [(30/r)+(1/15)]*[r5] => 30 = [(450+r)/15r]*[r5] => 450r = [450+r][r5] => r^2 5r2250 = 0 => (r50)(r+45) = 0 => r = 50.
(Method 2) This is the method used in the Manhattan guide. Speed in the actual case is considered to be (r+5). Time taken is therefore 30/(r+5). Speed in the hypothetical case is considered to be r. Time taken is 30/r. Because we know time taken in the hypothetical scenario is 4 minutes more, 30/r = [(30/(r+5))+(1/15)] => 30/r = [((450+r+5)/(15r+75)] => 30(15r+75) = r(455+r) => r^2 +5r2250 = 0 => (r+50)(r45) = 0 => r=45.
Can anyone please explain to me why both these methods DON'T yield the same answer? Isn't the first method more appropriate because the hypothetical scenario is the one in which we should assume the speed to be 5mph less than the actual and time taken is 4 minutes more than the actual?
Thanks. Hi all, I'm reviewing rates & work and even though I feel I pretty much got it figured out, questions like this one let me doubt myself. My question for this one is: Phoenix9 introduced 2 approaches to solve the question that use the information given differently, in approach 1 the fact that Liam should go 5mph slower is marked as (r5) in the hypothetical case. In approach 2 it's (r+5) in the actual case. No questions until here. I, however, tried like this: Real case: R: r+5 ; T: (30/r  1/15); Hypothetical case: R: R ; t: (30/r) The equation than comes to two negative values for r, which is unsolvable. My question is: what's the mistake in my approach? Thanks Christian



Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2014
Posts: 62
WE: General Management (NonProfit and Government)

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Nov 2014, 03:08
3
This post received KUDOS
case 1 rate = x time =30/x distance = 30 case 2 rate = x5 time = 30/(x5) distance = 30
given that, 30/(x5)  30/x =4/60 150/x(x5)=1/15 x^25x2250=0 x=50,45 so x=50mph



Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Posts: 1

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Jan 2015, 11:56
Phoenix9 wrote: My bad. Was dumb enough to ignore the (r+5) part. Thanks though Can someone explain to me why he would be 4 mins faster and break down the equations? I'm not getting why 30/(x5)  30/x = 4/60



Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2014
Posts: 49

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Feb 2015, 12:15
Thanks Akumar for the solution.



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13816

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2016, 01:09
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources



Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Posts: 36

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2016, 01:47
arrived at work only four minutes before he is to start.Can somebody explain what does this statement mean



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43853

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Sep 2016, 01:51



Director
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Posts: 562
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Aug 2017, 01:35
Phoenix9 wrote: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He explains to the police officer that he could not afford to be late today, and has arrived at work only four minutes before he is to start. The officer explains that if Liam had driven 5mph slower for his whole commute, he would have arrived at work exactly on time. If Liam's commute is 30 miles long,how fast was he actually driving?(Assume that Liam drove at a constant speed for the duration of his commute.) A. 50 mph B. 45 mph C. 48 mph D. 52 mph E. 60 mph OA: Solution:Of the many ways to solve this problem, two are as follows:
(Method 1) Assume the actual speed of Liam to be r. Distance travelled is 30 miles. So, time taken is 30/r. In the hypothetical case, speed of Liam is (r5). Distance remains the same. So, time taken is (30/r)+(1/15) because 4 minutes is 1/15th hour. So, translating these values into equations, the hypothetical scenario becomes:
distance = speed * time 30 = [(30/r)+(1/15)]*[r5] => 30 = [(450+r)/15r]*[r5] => 450r = [450+r][r5] => r^2 5r2250 = 0 => (r50)(r+45) = 0 => r = 50.
(Method 2) This is the method used in the Manhattan guide. Speed in the actual case is considered to be (r+5). Time taken is therefore 30/(r+5). Speed in the hypothetical case is considered to be r. Time taken is 30/r. Because we know time taken in the hypothetical scenario is 4 minutes more, 30/r = [(30/(r+5))+(1/15)] => 30/r = [((450+r+5)/(15r+75)] => 30(15r+75) = r(455+r) => r^2 +5r2250 = 0 => (r+50)(r45) = 0 => r=45.
Can anyone please explain to me why both these methods DON'T yield the same answer? Isn't the first method more appropriate because the hypothetical scenario is the one in which we should assume the speed to be 5mph less than the actual and time taken is 4 minutes more than the actual?
Thanks. Let the speed at which Liam drove at office actually be x mph So, the speed which traffic police suggested = x5 Distance between his home and office = 30 miles So, difference of time with these 2 speeds = 4 minutes So, 30/(x5)  30/x = 4/60 > 30*5/x(x5) = 1/15 > x(x5) = 30*5*15 > x^2  5x  30*5*15 = 0 > x^2  50x + 45x  30*5*15 = 0 > (x 50)(x+45) = 0 > x = 50 (as speed will be +ve) > So, he was actually driving at a speed of 50 miles per hour Answer A
_________________
CAT 99th percentiler : VA 97.27  DILR 96.84  QA 98.04  OA 98.95
MBA Social Network : WebMaggu
Appreciate by Clicking +1 Kudos ( Lets be more generous friends.)




Re: Liam is pulled over for speeding just as he is arriving at work.He
[#permalink]
02 Aug 2017, 01:35



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 22 posts ]



