Hi Tinytrotter,Your instinct about the "or equal" wording is worth taking seriously, so let's put it under the microscope, because that's exactly where the setup breaks.
The condition "
all elements of List B are less than or equal to the elements of List C" is not a per-element pairing - it's a single blanket rule between the two lists:
every value in B must sit at or below
every value in C. In plain terms, the largest thing in B can't exceed the smallest thing in C. So the "or equal" branch only rescues values that land right on that shared boundary; it does not give a value free rein to appear on both sides.
Where the 12 goes wrongThe moment
11 shows up in List C (from statement 2), every element of B is pinned to be less than or equal to
11 - because each B element must be less than or equal to that
11. A
12 sitting in List B would be greater than an element of List C (the
11), which breaks the rule outright. It doesn't matter that
12 also appears in C; the illegal comparison is "
12 in B vs.
11 in C," and that one alone is fatal. So the example with
12 in both lists isn't a valid case to test - it never satisfies the stem.
Here's the clean way to see what statement 2 forces:
-
11 is a mode of B, and every other B value is less than or equal to
11.
-
11 is a mode of C, and every other C value is greater than or equal to
11.
- So
11 is the
only value that can live in both lists (it's the boundary). Every other value belongs to just one side.
When you pool B and C into A,
11 collects its count from
both lists, while any other value can only draw from
one list - and in its own list it never out-appeared
11. So nothing can catch
11 once merged.
11 is the mode of A, uniquely. That's why statement (2) alone is
sufficient.
A quick way to lock the rule in: take List B = {
2,
5,
5} and List C = {
5,
8,
8}. Legal, because max(B) =
5 is less than or equal to min(C) =
5, meeting on the shared value
5. Now try to slip a
6 into B - instantly
6 >
5 in C, illegal. The boundary is the only place the two lists may touch.
Answer: BTinytrotter
I don't agree with the answer choice (B) and the simple reasoning is as follows.
We know that any element in List B cannot be more than List C. At max it can be equal or less, but not more.
Choice (B) tells us that 11 is "A" mode in both List B & List C. "a" mode indicates that 11 is one mode common to List B & List C. We do not know if there is any other element which is also a mode in List B & C as it is statistically possible for a list/set to have 2 or more modes at one time.
Since, the question asks for "The" mode of List A, Answer Choice B is clearly incorrect.
Example as follows:
List B = (1, 2, 5, 5, 5, 9, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12)
List C = (11, 11, 12, 12 15, 19, 21, 21)
Therefore, we satisfy both conditions presented i.e. both list B & list C are bi-modal and 11 is a mode in both List B & C.
However, combining this into List A which is (1, 2, 5, 5, 5, 9, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 15, 19, 21, 21) - we see that List A is also bimodal & has 2 modes i.e. 11 & 12 - both of which are repeated 5 times each. Therefore there is not one single mode and accordingly we cannot determine "The Mode" which is asked in the question.
Now, if the question asked for "a" mode of List A - then Choice (B) is correct but since it asks for "the" mode, I feel Choice (E) here is the most appropriate answer.