Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45498

1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
7
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
39% (02:07) correct 61% (01:39) wrong based on 122 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45498

Re M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 00:56



Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2012
Posts: 13

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Sep 2014, 12:39
and S2 sufficient because N=a*111111 where 111111 is divisible by 7? I haven't memorized divisibility rule for 7



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45498

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Sep 2014, 06:03



Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2013
Posts: 8

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2014, 07:32
Quote: (For example, F(4) is the value of the hundreds digit of N)? Sorry if I am wrong, but I believe the example should be F(4) is the value of the thousands digit of N .



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45498

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2014, 07:35



Intern
Joined: 09 Dec 2013
Posts: 8

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2014, 08:02
Omg, sure ! Thank you very much



Intern
Joined: 09 Aug 2014
Posts: 12

Re M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Mar 2015, 05:18
I think this question is good and not helpful. Text seems confusing. F(k) is the value of the k−th digit. So F(4) means the value of the 4th digit which is thousands, right?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 45498

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Mar 2015, 05:24



Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Posts: 8

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Mar 2015, 08:39
1
This post received KUDOS
Dear Bunuel
Could you please tell me what's the reasoning behind Statement 2? Is it the abovediscussed fact with x*111'111? If that is indeed the case, how should one get that 111111 is divisible by 7 within the 2 mins given?:) Would be more than happy to get enlighted...
Thx vm, Dark Might



Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2015
Posts: 8

Re M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Aug 2015, 10:48
1
This post received KUDOS
I think this the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate.



Current Student
Joined: 17 Oct 2015
Posts: 29
Concentration: Technology, Leadership

Re M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Feb 2016, 04:54
1
This post received KUDOS
I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. If someone could elaborate more... I just cant understand the reasons related at the explanations...



BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2606
GRE 1: 323 Q169 V154

mestrec wrote: I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. If someone could elaborate more... I just cant understand the reasons related at the explanations... I agree with you... And More importantly i am not sure divisibility by 7 is really on the GMAT maybe mikemcgarry can shed some light on whether we really need to do such questions or not .. Regards chirag
_________________
MBA Financing: INDIAN PUBLIC BANKS vs PRODIGY FINANCE! Getting into HOLLYWOOD with an MBA! The MOST AFFORDABLE MBA programs!STONECOLD's BRUTAL Mock Tests for GMATQuant(700+)AVERAGE GRE Scores At The Top Business Schools!



Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 52

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2016, 04:29
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statements (1) and (2) by themselves are sufficient. S1 tells us that the last three digits of \(N\) are the same as the first three digits: \(N = abcabc\). Note that \(N = abc*1000 + abc = abc*1001\). As 1001 is divisible by 7, \(N\) is also divisible by 7.
Answer: D Hi Bunuel, I am not sure if this part of the question is constructed properly. F(k) is the value of the k−th digit, (For example, F(4) is the value of the hundreds digit of N). Going by the statement you have given F (4) should be the value of the 4th digit right?. Also if I look at statement 1, F(1) = F(4) then here you have implied that the 1st digit = 4th digit. Therefore the question itself has clarity issues since how can F (K) stand for the kth digit as well as be the value for hundreds digit. Hope my question is clear.



Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 52

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2016, 04:30
Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statements (1) and (2) by themselves are sufficient. S1 tells us that the last three digits of \(N\) are the same as the first three digits: \(N = abcabc\). Note that \(N = abc*1000 + abc = abc*1001\). As 1001 is divisible by 7, \(N\) is also divisible by 7.
Answer: D Hi Bunuel, I am not sure if this part of the question is constructed properly. F(k) is the value of the k−th digit, (For example, F(4) is the value of the hundreds digit of N). Going by the statement you have given F (4) should be the value of the 4th digit right?. Also if I look at statement 1, F(1) = F(4) then here you have implied that the 1st digit = 4th digit. Therefore the question itself has clarity issues since how can F (K) stand for the kth digit as well as be the value for hundreds digit. Hope my question is clear.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5784

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Apr 2016, 05:19
nishatfarhat87 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statements (1) and (2) by themselves are sufficient. S1 tells us that the last three digits of \(N\) are the same as the first three digits: \(N = abcabc\). Note that \(N = abc*1000 + abc = abc*1001\). As 1001 is divisible by 7, \(N\) is also divisible by 7.
Answer: D Hi Bunuel, I am not sure if this part of the question is constructed properly. F(k) is the value of the k−th digit, (For example, F(4) is the value of the hundreds digit of N). Going by the statement you have given F (4) should be the value of the 4th digit right?. Also if I look at statement 1, F(1) = F(4) then here you have implied that the 1st digit = 4th digit. Therefore the question itself has clarity issues since how can F (K) stand for the kth digit as well as be the value for hundreds digit. Hope my question is clear. Hi .. why cant be two digits have same value .. example 123123.. here F(1) = F(4) = 1.. similarly other numbers can be seen as F(2) = F(5) = 2.. F(3) = F(6) = 3..
_________________
Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
GMAT online Tutor



Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 402
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)

Re M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Aug 2016, 04:13
I think this is a highquality question and I agree with explanation.



Manager
Status: One Last Shot !!!
Joined: 04 May 2014
Posts: 247
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V32 GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V35

Bunuel wrote: Official Solution:
Statements (1) and (2) by themselves are sufficient. S1 tells us that the last three digits of \(N\) are the same as the first three digits: \(N = abcabc\). Note that \(N = abc*1000 + abc = abc*1001\). As 1001 is divisible by 7, \(N\) is also divisible by 7.
Answer: D Bunuel, thanks for the explanation! I think you missed the explanation for S2. How did we conclude that S2 is sufficient? I just realised that every 6digit number with all same digits is divisible by 7. But, are we supposed to know this or we can prove S2's sufficiency algebraically too?
_________________
One Kudos for an everlasting piece of knowledge is not a bad deal at all...
 Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. Mark Twain



Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2015
Posts: 19

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Dec 2016, 04:33
Hi Buenel,
Request you to kindly explain algebraically why Statement 2 is sufficient.
Many Thanks.



Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1378
Location: Viet Nam

Re: M1529 [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Dec 2016, 11:51
dsheth7 wrote: Hi Buenel,
Request you to kindly explain algebraically why Statement 2 is sufficient.
Many Thanks. State 2 is explained here m15184061.html#p1420417DarkMight wrote: Dear Bunuel
Could you please tell me what's the reasoning behind Statement 2? Is it the abovediscussed fact with x*111'111? If that is indeed the case, how should one get that 111111 is divisible by 7 within the 2 mins given?:) Would be more than happy to get enlighted...
Thx vm, Dark Might stonecold wrote: mestrec wrote: I think this is a highquality question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. If someone could elaborate more... I just cant understand the reasons related at the explanations... I agree with you... And More importantly i am not sure divisibility by 7 is really on the GMAT maybe mikemcgarry can shed some light on whether we really need to do such questions or not .. Regards chirag In my opinion, in actual GMAT, we are not allowed to use calculator, so every calculation is done by ourselves. In case that we face this question, I think we could still complete it under 2 mins. In statement (1), we simply check whether 1001 is divisible by 7 or not. In statement (2), we simply check whether 111,111 is divisible by 7 or not. And the division by 7 is not complex. I believe that anyone could make it in about 10 secs. Here is how I make the calculation Attachment: Untitled.png
>> !!!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
_________________
Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall
How to solve quadratic equations  Factor quadratic equations Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities Applying AMGM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value
New Error Log with Timer







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 30 posts ]



