Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44421

Question Stats:
46% (01:09) correct 54% (01:59) wrong based on 72 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44421

Re M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 01:19
1
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED



Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2014
Posts: 5

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 May 2015, 22:40
Hello,
Please explain stmt. 2 in detail  Is it possible to get more than one solution for stmt.2?
Regards, Mahuya
Statements (1) and (2) combined are insufficient. There is no limitation on the number of books. Without this limitation, the question cannot be answered: there is an infinite number of integers that satisfy the setup and the statements.
Answer: E[/quote]



Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 39
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V31 GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Jul 2015, 17:44
1
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
mahuya78Basically the question is saying that X (being the number of books) divided by 5 gives you remainder of 1. Question is, can we determine X? A) X/7 gives us remainder of 1. So X can be: 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, 85, 92, 99 etc (just keep adding 7 and you will get infinite options). In the list above, there are 2 numbers *that I listed* that will yield a remainder of 1, when divided by 5: 36 and 71. So insufficient. B) X/8 gives us remainder of 4. So X can be: 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, 52, 60, 68, 76, 84, 92, 100, 108 etc (again, just keep adding 8 and you will get infinite options). In the list above, there are 2 numbers *that I listed* that will yield a remainder of 1, when divided by 5: 36 and 76. So again, insufficient. C) Apparently there seems to be only one option: 36, which would make you believe you have enough information. But the truth is that if you keep on trying, you will find other options that will fit both restrictions (for instance: 316), making both together insufficient. Since testing all these numbers is somewhat impossible in the given time, I recommend you to learn this type of question so whenever you are asked, you know how to tackle it. Cheers!



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5732

@michaelyb wrote: @mahuya78Basically the question is saying that X (being the number of books) divided by 5 gives you remainder of 1. Question is, can we determine X? A) X/7 gives us remainder of 1. So X can be: 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43, 50, 57, 64, 71, 78, 85, 92, 99 etc (just keep adding 7 and you will get infinite options). In the list above, there are 2 numbers *that I listed* that will yield a remainder of 1, when divided by 5: 36 and 71. So insufficient. B) X/8 gives us remainder of 4. So X can be: 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, 52, 60, 68, 76, 84, 92, 100, 108 etc (again, just keep adding 8 and you will get infinite options). In the list above, there are 2 numbers *that I listed* that will yield a remainder of 1, when divided by 5: 36 and 76. So again, insufficient. C) Apparently there seems to be only one option: 36, which would make you believe you have enough information. But the truth is that if you keep on trying, you will find other options that will fit both restrictions (for instance: 316), making both together insufficient. Since testing all these numbers is somewhat impossible in the given time, I recommend you to learn this type of question so whenever you are asked, you know how to tackle it. Cheers! Hi, you have missed lot many numbers in between ... after 36, the next will not be 316.. the way to find the next number after first number is .. first number +LCM of the two numbers.. in this case 36 + LCM of 7 & 8= 36 + 56 = 92.. and next 92 + 56 = 148 and so on..
_________________
Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
GMAT online Tutor



Intern
Joined: 11 Nov 2014
Posts: 39
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V31 GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2015, 15:40
1
This post received KUDOS
chetan2uYou forgot to include 5 in your LCM calculation since X divided by 5 gives you a remainder of 1 according to the question stem, and 148 does not. So the next number after 36 is indeed 36 + the LCM of 7, 8 and 5, or 36+280 .



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 179

Given: 5x+1 > 1,6,11,16... S1) 7x+1 Therefore the combine sequence will be x+35 Let's start with 7x+1, here LCM(7,5)=35 gives the repeating term "35". Now we need to figure out variable term. 7x+1 x=0 => 1 => Divide this output of 1 [7*0+1 = 1] by 5 => 1/5 => remainder(1). Note that this remainder 1 matches with the repeating term of original sequence = 5x+1 That's how you know that we have received the variable term of the merged sequence => x + 35 Now common terms => x+35 => 35,36,37,38,39,40,41..... 5x+1 => 5*6+1=36, 5*8+1=41 Not sufficient
S2) 8x+4 X=4 => 32+4 = 36 => 36/5 = r(1) => variable term = 36 Merged sequence = 36x+40 NOTE:initially you will take some time to figure out this merged sequence but with practice you will get better. I prefer this method because in using simply number from the sequence many times i miss some and am not able to get correct results as to if statement is sufficient or not. 36x+40 => 40,76,112,148,184,220,256 5x+1 > 5*15+1=76, & 5*51+1=256 Not sufficient
S(1+2): 5x+1 & 7x+1 & 8x+4 => common terms between x+35 & 36x+40 36x+40 = (35x+6)+(x+35) Whenever, we have something as this => one sequence can be made part of other => there are ALWAYS common terms.
Also, x+35 is a sequence of adding 1 to all the numbers after 35 => 36,37,38... So we can definitely say that 40, 76 and other terms of 36x+40 are also a part of x+35. So not sufficient. E
Last edited by manishtank1988 on 01 Apr 2017, 09:05, edited 1 time in total.



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 179

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2017, 09:01
Hello moderators, Engr2012, Abhishek009, Skywalker18, Bunuel, mikemcgarry, VeritasPrepKarishma, Vyshak, msk0657, abhimahnaPlease let me know if there is a faster method to solve these kinds of problems. It took me > 2.5 minutes in solving it. Any help appreciated. Thanks



Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3266

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Apr 2017, 09:22
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
manishtank1988 wrote: Please let me know if there is a faster method to solve these kinds of problems. It took me > 2.5 minutes in solving it. Any help appreciated. Thanks Hey, the best way to solve such questions is as follows: Question is saying N = 5k + 1; Number could be 1,6,... Statement 1: N = 7k+1 If I want to find the common numbers, I will use First Common Number + LCM method. So, N = 1, 1st Term+(LCM of 5,7), 2nd Term + (LCM of 5,7), and so on. or N = 1, 36,72. Since, we can multiple values of N. It means Insufficient. Statement 2: N = 8k+4 First common N = 36. Next term = 36 + LCM(5,8), and so on. or N = 36 + 40 = 76 So, we have more than 1 common values, hence, Insufficient. Combining: N = 7k+1 and N = 8k'+4 First common = 36. Second = 36 + LCM(7,8)=92. Hence, again more than 1. Insufficient. Hence, E
_________________
How I improved from V21 to V40! ? How to use this forum in THE BEST way?



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 179

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Apr 2017, 10:15
abhimahna wrote: manishtank1988 wrote: Please let me know if there is a faster method to solve these kinds of problems. It took me > 2.5 minutes in solving it. Any help appreciated. Thanks Hey, the best way to solve such questions is as follows: Question is saying N = 5k + 1; Number could be 1,6,... Statement 1: N = 7k+1 If I want to find the common numbers, I will use First Common Number + LCM method. So, N = 1, 1st Term+(LCM of 5,7), 2nd Term + (LCM of 5,7), and so on. or N = 1, 36,72. Since, we can multiple values of N. It means Insufficient. Statement 2: N = 8k+4 First common N = 36. Next term = 36 + LCM(5,8), and so on. or N = 36 + 40 = 76 So, we have more than 1 common values, hence, Insufficient. Combining: N = 7k+1 and N = 8k'+4 First common = 36. Second = 36 + LCM(7,8)=92. Hence, again more than 1. Insufficient. Hence, E Thanks abhimahna



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8003
Location: Pune, India

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Apr 2017, 07:14
2
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
manishtank1988 wrote: Hello moderators, Engr2012, Abhishek009, Skywalker18, Bunuel, mikemcgarry, VeritasPrepKarishma, Vyshak, msk0657, abhimahnaPlease let me know if there is a faster method to solve these kinds of problems. It took me > 2.5 minutes in solving it. Any help appreciated. Thanks Check out these divisibility posts: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... unraveled/https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... yapplied/https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... emainders/https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... spartii/Now the question can be done in seconds. Data in the Question stem: N = (5a + 1) or (5a'  4) Stmnt 1: N = (7b + 1) or (7b'  6) Using Stmnt 1 alone (and data in the question stem), The common remainder is 1 so N = 35m + 1. (because 35 is the LCM of 5 and 7) There will be infinite values of N such as 1, 36, 71 etc Stmnt 2: N = (8c + 4) or (8c'  4) Using Stmnt 2 alone (and data in the question stem), The common remainder is 4 so N = 40p  4 (because 40 is the LCM of 5 and 8) There will be infinite values of N such as 36, 76 etc Using both stmnts, we see that the first common value is 36. So N = 280q + 36 (because 280 is the LCM of 35 and 40). There will be infinite numbers of this form. Answer (E)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 179

Re: M2329 [#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Apr 2017, 18:56
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote: manishtank1988 wrote: Hello moderators, Engr2012, Abhishek009, Skywalker18, Bunuel, mikemcgarry, VeritasPrepKarishma, Vyshak, msk0657, abhimahnaPlease let me know if there is a faster method to solve these kinds of problems. It took me > 2.5 minutes in solving it. Any help appreciated. Thanks Check out these divisibility posts: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... unraveled/https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... yapplied/https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... emainders/https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... spartii/Now the question can be done in seconds. Data in the Question stem: N = (5a + 1) or (5a'  4) Stmnt 1: N = (7b + 1) or (7b'  6) Using Stmnt 1 alone (and data in the question stem), The common remainder is 1 so N = 35m + 1. (because 35 is the LCM of 5 and 7) There will be infinite values of N such as 1, 36, 71 etc Stmnt 2: N = (8c + 4) or (8c'  4) Using Stmnt 2 alone (and data in the question stem), The common remainder is 4 so N = 40p  4 (because 40 is the LCM of 5 and 8) There will be infinite values of N such as 36, 76 etc Using both stmnts, we see that the first common value is 36. So N = 280q + 36 (because 280 is the LCM of 35 and 40). There will be infinite numbers of this form. Answer (E) Great solution: VeritasPrepKarishmaThanks a lot










